Anders Fugmann dc8b6f99ac Kotlin: unify enum library-test query across suites
The `enum` library test used two different queries in test-kotlin1 and
test-kotlin2, so their `.expected` files were not comparable (78 divergent lines
that reflected the query difference, not an extractor difference):

  * test-kotlin1: `from Method m, RefType t where t = m.getDeclaringType() and
    t.getName() = ["Enum", "Enum<?>", "Enum<E>", "EnumUserKt"]
    select t.getQualifiedName(), t.getName(), m.getName()`
  * test-kotlin2: `from Method m where m.getDeclaringType().getName().matches("Enum%")
    select m.getName()`

The K1 query is the more precise of the two: it pins the declaring types by exact
name and reports the qualified name alongside the method, whereas the K2
`matches("Enum%")` form also pulls in unrelated `java.util.EnumSet` members as
noise. We adopt the K1 query in both suites (a pure test-input synchronisation,
no extractor change).

After unification the two suites' output is identical except for a single row:
test-kotlin2 additionally reports `kotlin.Enum | Enum | finalize`. That is a
compiler-builtin difference (the Kotlin `kotlin.Enum` built-in class exposes
`finalize` under the 2.4.0/K2 frontend but not under the 2.3.20/K1 frontend); it
is a compiler-version artifact of the built-in class member set, not something the
extractor synthesises, so it is tracked separately rather than papered over here.

All 3333 tests pass in both suites; test-kotlin1 is unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-13 21:35:04 +02:00
2022-10-20 08:21:02 -04:00
2026-05-27 17:41:44 +02:00
2026-07-09 03:03:43 +00:00
2026-06-29 12:05:42 +02:00
2026-02-10 13:44:04 +01:00
2018-09-23 16:24:31 -07:00
2025-09-25 14:03:39 +01:00
2026-05-12 11:24:35 +00:00
2026-05-08 13:41:45 +00:00
2022-04-12 12:40:59 +02:00
2024-05-07 13:09:08 +01:00

CodeQL

This open source repository contains the standard CodeQL libraries and queries that power GitHub Advanced Security and the other application security products that GitHub makes available to its customers worldwide.

How do I learn CodeQL and run queries?

There is extensive documentation about the CodeQL language, writing CodeQL using the CodeQL extension for Visual Studio Code and using the CodeQL CLI.

Contributing

We welcome contributions to our standard library and standard checks. Do you have an idea for a new check, or how to improve an existing query? Then please go ahead and open a pull request! Before you do, though, please take the time to read our contributing guidelines. You can also consult our style guides to learn how to format your code for consistency and clarity, how to write query metadata, and how to write query help documentation for your query.

For information on contributing to CodeQL documentation, see the "contributing guide" for docs.

License

The code in this repository is licensed under the MIT License by GitHub.

The CodeQL CLI (including the CodeQL engine) is hosted in a different repository and is licensed separately. If you'd like to use the CodeQL CLI to analyze closed-source code, you will need a separate commercial license; please contact us for further help.

Visual Studio Code integration

If you use Visual Studio Code to work in this repository, there are a few integration features to make development easier.

CodeQL for Visual Studio Code

You can install the CodeQL for Visual Studio Code extension to get syntax highlighting, IntelliSense, and code navigation for the QL language, as well as unit test support for testing CodeQL libraries and queries.

Tasks

The .vscode/tasks.json file defines custom tasks specific to working in this repository. To invoke one of these tasks, select the Terminal | Run Task... menu option, and then select the desired task from the dropdown. You can also invoke the Tasks: Run Task command from the command palette.

Description
CodeQL: the libraries and queries that power security researchers around the world, as well as code scanning in GitHub Advanced Security
Readme MIT 21 GiB
Languages
CodeQL 32.2%
Kotlin 27.1%
C# 16.9%
Java 7.6%
Python 4.6%
Other 11.4%