b8a16923ba
The local variable declaration expression (extractVariableExpr) computed its
location via getPsiBasedLocation(v as IrElement). The `as IrElement` cast forced
overload resolution to the generic getPsiBasedLocation(IrElement), which resolves
the PSI element straight from the IR element's raw source offsets via
PsiSourceManager.findPsiElement. Those offsets differ between the two frontend
language versions:
fun f(param: Int) {
val local1 = 2 + 3 // line 6: ` val local1 = 2 + 3`
}
- With -language-version 1.9 the IrVariable offsets cover only the name, so
findPsiElement returns the name leaf and the variable is located at 6:13:6:18.
- With -language-version 2.0 the IrVariable offsets cover the whole declaration,
so it is located at 6:9:6:26 (the `val` keyword through the initialiser).
The IrVariable-specific overload getPsiBasedLocation(IrVariable) is frontend
stable: it finds the leaf at the variable's start offset, walks up to the
enclosing KtVariableDeclaration and returns the span from the `val`/`var` keyword
to the end of the declaration. Using it for the entity location makes both
language versions emit the full declaration span 6:9:6:26.
This is the same helper already used for the enclosing localvariabledeclstmt
location; this change applies it to the variable entity (localvars / the
localvariabledeclexpr) as well, so the two are consistent.
Effect: 12 test-kotlin1 expected files move toward the test-kotlin2 output (all
strictly reduce the tk1-vs-tk2 difference; e.g. variables 16->4, reflection
111->67, exprs 1759->1363 diff lines). test-kotlin2 output is unchanged (the
overload produces the same span there as the generic one did). Both suites pass
all 3333 tests with --check-databases.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Also update the enhanced-nullability Kotlin integration test expected: its
local variable declaration expression now spans the val/var keyword to the
initialiser (user.kt:2:7:2:7 -> user.kt:2:3:2:16), consistent with the
library-test convergence.
CodeQL
This open source repository contains the standard CodeQL libraries and queries that power GitHub Advanced Security and the other application security products that GitHub makes available to its customers worldwide.
How do I learn CodeQL and run queries?
There is extensive documentation about the CodeQL language, writing CodeQL using the CodeQL extension for Visual Studio Code and using the CodeQL CLI.
Contributing
We welcome contributions to our standard library and standard checks. Do you have an idea for a new check, or how to improve an existing query? Then please go ahead and open a pull request! Before you do, though, please take the time to read our contributing guidelines. You can also consult our style guides to learn how to format your code for consistency and clarity, how to write query metadata, and how to write query help documentation for your query.
For information on contributing to CodeQL documentation, see the "contributing guide" for docs.
License
The code in this repository is licensed under the MIT License by GitHub.
The CodeQL CLI (including the CodeQL engine) is hosted in a different repository and is licensed separately. If you'd like to use the CodeQL CLI to analyze closed-source code, you will need a separate commercial license; please contact us for further help.
Visual Studio Code integration
If you use Visual Studio Code to work in this repository, there are a few integration features to make development easier.
CodeQL for Visual Studio Code
You can install the CodeQL for Visual Studio Code extension to get syntax highlighting, IntelliSense, and code navigation for the QL language, as well as unit test support for testing CodeQL libraries and queries.
Tasks
The .vscode/tasks.json file defines custom tasks specific to working in this repository. To invoke one of these tasks, select the Terminal | Run Task... menu option, and then select the desired task from the dropdown. You can also invoke the Tasks: Run Task command from the command palette.