- unified/swift: Mark `binding_kind` as a raw `@@` capture in the
property_declaration rule. It is only used to read its source text
(`ctx.ast.source_text`), never as a translated node. With `@` the
auto-translate prefix would route the unnamed `let`/`var` token
through the catch-all `_ @node => {node}` fallback for a no-op
roundtrip; `@@` makes the intent explicit and removes that reliance.
- shared/yeast/tests: Reword a stale comment in test_raw_capture_marker.
The text claimed a "second assertion" exists in this test, but the
explicit-translation check actually lives in the companion
test_raw_capture_marker_explicit_translate.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
With `@@name` available, there's no longer a need to use `manual_rule!`.
Every place where it is used, we can instead just mark the relevant raw
captures as such. This results in quite a lot of cleanup! (Also, to me
at least, it makes these rules a lot easier to reason about.)
A first iteration of this approach resulted in a lot of
`.map(Into::into)` being needed, because `SwiftContext` stores `Id`s,
but captures produce `NodeRef`s. To avoid this, I swapped it around so
that the context stores `NodeRef`s. This does require adding `.into()`
in a few places, but it makes the rest of the code a lot more ergonomic.
The `@@name` capture marker in `rule!` queries skips the
auto-translate prefix for that specific capture, letting the body see
the original capture (and thus delay its translation using
`ctx.translate` until it becomes convenient).
Regular `@name` captures continue to be auto-translated as before.
Specifically these are translated _eagerly_, before the main body of the
rewrite rule is run.
I settled on `@@` as the syntax because it did not add new symbols that
the user has to keep track of (it's still a kind of capture), but it's
still visually distinct enough that the user should be able to tell that
there's something special going on. In principle one could accidentally
write one form of capture where the other was intended, but in practice
this would result in code that did not compile (because the types would
not match).
Format the touched Rust crates (shared/tree-sitter-extractor,
shared/yeast, shared/yeast-macros, unified/extractor) so the
tree-sitter-extractor CI fmt check passes. No functional changes.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Cleans up a few places where we were constructing trees piece by piece
rather than using the `tree!` macro.
In the process, Copilot noticed an issue that should probably be
addressed: the labeled_statement rule can never fire, since there are no
such nodes in the input. This is possibly a simple as making
_labeled_statement (which _does_ exist) named, but I haven't attempted
this.
Finally, a small change to yeast makes it so that the contents of a {}
interpolation can be a Rust block (previously it could only be a single
expression). This avoids the need to double-wrap instances where you
want to interpolate a single node produced as the final value of some
block.
(Both reduce_left and map are still supported, but we could remove them
at this point.)
I think this way of writing things makes the intent a lot clearer -- it
avoids extending the yeast rule language with complicated constructs,
pushing the complexity (such as it is) into Rust instead.
Gets rid of the final uses of mutation (via prepend_field). The approach
is the same as in the preceding commits: we set the appropriate fields
on the context when processing the outer node, and then access these
fields on the inner nodes.
The repeated use of `modifier` fields is a _bit_ clunky, but since we're
likely moving to an out-of-band modifier mechanism at some point, I
think it's good enough for now.
Avoids more "mutation after creation" via prepend_field.
Also adds a test to the corpus for exercising this syntax. Although it's
not evident, the test output was unchanged by this refactoring.
Extends the context with a field for keeping track of the default value.
In the process, we also rename the context to SwiftContext as it now
doesn't only concern itself with properties.
Propagates in name and type information for various property
declarations, using the context mechanism. This avoids mutating
already-translated nodes in-place, and is generally much easier to read.
This was necessary since otherwise the generic type of the
user-specified context (which should only be a concern for yeast) starts
to bleed out into the shared extractor. Instead, we type-erase it by
putting it inside the aforementioned trait.
