There was already a `WriteSideEffectInstruction` class that served as a
superclass for all the specific write side effects. This new class
serves the same purpose for read side effects.
When building SSA, we'll be assuming that stack variables do not escape, at least until we improve our alias analysis. I've added a new `IREscapeAnalysisConfiguration` class to allow the query to control this, and a new `UseSoundEscapeAnalysis.qll` module that can be imported to switch to the sound escape analysis. I've cloned the existing IR and SSA tests to have both sound and unsound versions. There were relatively few diffs in the IR dump tests, and the sanity tests still give the same results after one change described below.
Assuming that stack variables do not escape exposed an existing bug where we do not emit an `Uninitialized` instruction for the temporary variables used by `return` statements and `throw` expressions, even if the initializer is a constructor call or array initializer. I've refactored the code for handling elements that initialize a variable to share a common base class. I added a test case for returning an object initialized by constructor call, and ensured that the IR diffs for the existing `throw` test cases are correct.
The aliased SSA code was assuming that, for every automatic variable, there would be at least one memory access that reads or writes the entire variable. We've encountered a couple cases where that isn't true due to extractor issues. As a workaround, we now always create the `VariableMemoryLocation` for every local variable.
I've also added a sanity test to detect this condition in the future.
Along the way, I had to fix a perf issue in the PrintIR code. When determining the ID of a result based on line number, we were considering all `Instruction`s generated for a particular line, regardless of whether they were all in the same `IRFunction`. In addition, the predicate had what appeared to be a bad join order that made it take forever on large snapshots. I've scoped it down to just consider `Instruction`s in the same function, and outlined that predicate to fix the join order issue. This causes some numbering changes, but they're for the better. I don't think there was actually any nondeterminism there before, but now the numbering won't depend on the number of instantiations of a template, either.
Previously, we had several predicates on `Instruction` and `Operand` whose values were determined solely by the opcode of the instruction. For large snapshots, this meant that we would populate large tables mapping each of the millions of `Instruction`s to the appropriate value, times three (once for each IR flavor).
This change moves all of these opcode properties onto `Opcode` itself, with inline wrapper predicates on `Instruction` and `Operand` where necessary. On smaller snapshots, like ChakraCore, performance is a wash, but this did speed up Wireshark by about 4%.
Even ignoring the modest performance benefit, having these properties defined on `Opcode` seems like a better organization than having them on `Instruction` and `Operand`.
Ternary conditionals `b ? x : y` mistakenly had taint-tracking steps from both
`b`, `x`, and `y` to the conditional expression itself. Flow from `b` was not
intented, and flow from `x` and `y` is already part of ordinary data flow.
