This makes sure we can conclude from `(int)myShort == 0` that `myShort`
is 0 even though we can no longer conclude from `(short)myInt == 0` that
`myInt` is 0. Without this, we lost a good result in the test for
`InfiniteLoopWithUnsatisfiableExitCondition.ql`.
Reported by an LGTM customer here: https://discuss.lgtm.com/t/2-false-positives-in-c-for-comparison-is-always-same/1943.
Even though the comparison is pointless in the preprocessor configuration in effect during extraction, it is not pointless in other preprocessor configurations. Similar to ExprHasNoEffect, we'll now exclude results in functions that contain preprocessor-excluded code. I factored the similar code already used in ExprHasNoEffect in a non-recursive version into Preprocessor.qll, leaving the recursive version in ExprHasNoEffect.ql. I believe the recursive version is too aggressive for PointerlessComparison, which does no interprocedural analysis.
C promotion rules. The following issues are now flagged:
(1) passing a larger type than the receiver can accept
(e.g., long long -> int)
(2) passing a type of different signedness than the
parameter specified.
The IR construction code wasn't handling lambda expressions, so I added `TranslatedLambdaExpression`. It's pretty straightforward: it creates a temporary variable, initializes it with an `Uninitialized` instruction, then initializes the individual captured fields with the initializer list supplied in the AST.
When testing the case of a lambda with no captures, I noticed that we weren't handling initialization of empty structs with an initializer list correctly, so I fixed that along the way.
I was getting confused by the bad indentation for wrapped lines in
TranslatedInitialization.qll, so I fixed that up in a separate commit.
The `Expr.getType` predicate returns a pointer type since that's the
type of the `new`-expression as a whole. To find the class type, we use
`NewExpr.getAllocatedType`.
This commit reduces the number of alerts in a Qt snapshot from 229 to
51, and it removes the two false positives in
https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface.
