mirror of
https://github.com/github/codeql.git
synced 2026-05-14 11:19:27 +02:00
Python: Add BasicBlockOrdering test
This one demonstrates a bug in the current CFG. In a dictionary
comprehension `{k: v for k, v in d.items()}`, we evaluate the value
before the key, which is incorrect. (A fix for this bug has been
implemented in a separate PR.)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
| test_comprehensions.py:21:29:21:40 | ControlFlowNode for BinaryExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_comprehensions.py:21:35:21:35 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 9 | test_comprehensions.py:21:21:21:21 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 8 |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks that within a single basic block, annotations appear in
|
||||
* increasing minimum-timestamp order.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
import python
|
||||
import TimerUtils
|
||||
|
||||
from TimerCfgNode a, TimerCfgNode b, int minA, int minB
|
||||
where
|
||||
exists(BasicBlock bb, int i, int j | a = bb.getNode(i) and b = bb.getNode(j) and i < j) and
|
||||
minA = min(a.getATimestamp()) and
|
||||
minB = min(b.getATimestamp()) and
|
||||
minA >= minB
|
||||
select a, "Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@", a.getTimestampExpr(minA),
|
||||
"timestamp " + minA, b.getTimestampExpr(minB), "timestamp " + minB
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user