Merge pull request #14050 from jketema/inline-6

Consolidate all `InlineFlowTest` libraries in the dataflow qlpack
This commit is contained in:
Jeroen Ketema
2023-08-29 09:30:35 +02:00
committed by GitHub
139 changed files with 284 additions and 698 deletions

View File

@@ -3,19 +3,6 @@
* See `shared/util/codeql/util/test/InlineExpectationsTest.qll`
*/
private import csharp as CS
private import codeql.util.test.InlineExpectationsTest
private module Impl implements InlineExpectationsTestSig {
/**
* A class representing line comments in C# used by the InlineExpectations core code
*/
class ExpectationComment extends CS::SinglelineComment {
/** Gets the contents of the given comment, _without_ the preceding comment marker (`//`). */
string getContents() { result = this.getText() }
}
class Location = CS::Location;
}
private import internal.InlineExpectationsTestImpl
import Make<Impl>

View File

@@ -1,120 +1,34 @@
/**
* Provides a simple base test for flow-related tests using inline expectations.
*
* Example for a test.ql:
* ```ql
* import csharp
* import TestUtilities.InlineFlowTest
* import DefaultFlowTest
* import PathGraph
*
* from PathNode source, PathNode sink
* where flowPath(source, sink)
* select sink, source, sink, "$@", source, source.toString()
*
* ```
*
* To declare expectations, you can use the $hasTaintFlow or $hasValueFlow comments within the test source files.
* Example of the corresponding test file, e.g. Test.cs
* ```csharp
* public class Test
* {
* object Source() { return null; }
* string Taint() { return null; }
* void Sink(object o) { }
*
* public void test()
* {
* var s = Source(1);
* Sink(s); // $ hasValueFlow=1
* var t = "foo" + Taint(2);
* Sink(t); // $ hasTaintFlow=2
* }
* }
* ```
*
* If you are only interested in value flow, then instead of importing `DefaultFlowTest`, you can import
* `ValueFlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig>`. Similarly, if you are only interested in taint flow, then instead of
* importing `DefaultFlowTest`, you can import `TaintFlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig>`. In both cases
* `DefaultFlowConfig` can be replaced by another implementation of `DataFlow::ConfigSig`.
*
* If you need more fine-grained tuning, consider implementing a test using `InlineExpectationsTest`.
* Inline flow tests for CSharp.
* See `shared/util/codeql/dataflow/test/InlineFlowTest.qll`
*/
import csharp
import TestUtilities.InlineExpectationsTest
private import codeql.dataflow.test.InlineFlowTest
private import semmle.code.csharp.dataflow.internal.DataFlowImplSpecific
private import semmle.code.csharp.dataflow.internal.TaintTrackingImplSpecific
private import internal.InlineExpectationsTestImpl
private predicate defaultSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
source.asExpr().(MethodCall).getTarget().getUndecoratedName() = ["Source", "Taint"]
}
private predicate defaultSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(MethodCall mc | mc.getTarget().hasUndecoratedName("Sink") |
sink.asExpr() = mc.getAnArgument()
)
}
module DefaultFlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) { defaultSource(source) }
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) { defaultSink(sink) }
int fieldFlowBranchLimit() { result = 1000 }
}
private module NoFlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) { none() }
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) { none() }
}
private string getSourceArgString(DataFlow::Node src) {
defaultSource(src) and
src.asExpr().(MethodCall).getAnArgument().getValue() = result
}
module FlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig ValueFlowConfig, DataFlow::ConfigSig TaintFlowConfig> {
module ValueFlow = DataFlow::Global<ValueFlowConfig>;
module TaintFlow = TaintTracking::Global<TaintFlowConfig>;
private module InlineTest implements TestSig {
string getARelevantTag() { result = ["hasValueFlow", "hasTaintFlow"] }
predicate hasActualResult(Location location, string element, string tag, string value) {
tag = "hasValueFlow" and
exists(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink | ValueFlow::flow(src, sink) |
sink.getLocation() = location and
element = sink.toString() and
if exists(getSourceArgString(src)) then value = getSourceArgString(src) else value = ""
)
or
tag = "hasTaintFlow" and
exists(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink |
TaintFlow::flow(src, sink) and not ValueFlow::flow(src, sink)
|
sink.getLocation() = location and
element = sink.toString() and
if exists(getSourceArgString(src)) then value = getSourceArgString(src) else value = ""
)
}
private module FlowTestImpl implements InputSig<CsharpDataFlow> {
predicate defaultSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
source.asExpr().(MethodCall).getTarget().getUndecoratedName() = ["Source", "Taint"]
}
import MakeTest<InlineTest>
import DataFlow::MergePathGraph<ValueFlow::PathNode, TaintFlow::PathNode, ValueFlow::PathGraph, TaintFlow::PathGraph>
predicate defaultSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(MethodCall mc | mc.getTarget().hasUndecoratedName("Sink") |
sink.asExpr() = mc.getAnArgument()
)
}
predicate flowPath(PathNode source, PathNode sink) {
ValueFlow::flowPath(source.asPathNode1(), sink.asPathNode1()) or
TaintFlow::flowPath(source.asPathNode2(), sink.asPathNode2())
private string getSourceArgString(DataFlow::Node src) {
defaultSource(src) and
src.asExpr().(MethodCall).getAnArgument().getValue() = result
}
string getArgString(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink) {
(if exists(getSourceArgString(src)) then result = getSourceArgString(src) else result = "") and
exists(sink)
}
}
module DefaultFlowTest = FlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig, DefaultFlowConfig>;
module ValueFlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig ValueFlowConfig> {
import FlowTest<ValueFlowConfig, NoFlowConfig>
}
module TaintFlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig TaintFlowConfig> {
import FlowTest<NoFlowConfig, TaintFlowConfig>
}
import InlineFlowTestMake<CsharpDataFlow, CsharpTaintTracking, Impl, FlowTestImpl>

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
private import csharp as CS
private import codeql.util.test.InlineExpectationsTest
module Impl implements InlineExpectationsTestSig {
/**
* A class representing line comments in C# used by the InlineExpectations core code
*/
class ExpectationComment extends CS::SinglelineComment {
/** Gets the contents of the given comment, _without_ the preceding comment marker (`//`). */
string getContents() { result = this.getText() }
}
class Location = CS::Location;
}

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
failures
testFailures
edges
| A.cs:5:17:5:28 | call to method Source<C> : C | A.cs:6:24:6:24 | access to local variable c : C |

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
failures
testFailures
edges
| Operator.cs:9:39:9:39 | x : C | Operator.cs:9:50:9:50 | access to parameter x : C |

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
failures
testFailures
edges
nodes

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
failures
testFailures
edges
| Tuples.cs:7:18:7:34 | call to method Source<Object> : Object | Tuples.cs:10:21:10:22 | access to local variable o1 : Object |

View File

@@ -3,20 +3,6 @@
* See `shared/util/codeql/util/test/InlineExpectationsTest.qll`
*/
private import go as G
private import codeql.util.test.InlineExpectationsTest
private module Impl implements InlineExpectationsTestSig {
/**
* A class representing line comments in the Go style, including the
* preceding comment marker (`//`).
*/
class ExpectationComment extends G::Comment {
/** Returns the contents of the given comment, _without_ the preceding comment marker (`//`). */
string getContents() { result = this.getText() }
}
class Location = G::Location;
}
private import internal.InlineExpectationsTestImpl
import Make<Impl>

View File

@@ -1,112 +1,29 @@
/**
* Provides a simple base test for flow-related tests using inline expectations.
*
* Example for a test.ql:
* ```ql
* import go
* import TestUtilities.InlineFlowTest
* import DefaultFlowTest
* import PathGraph
*
* from PathNode source, PathNode sink
* where flowPath(source, sink)
* select sink, source, sink, "$@", source, source.toString()
* ```
*
* To declare expectations, you can use the $hasTaintFlow or $hasValueFlow comments within the test source files.
* Example of the corresponding test file, e.g. Test.go
* ```go
* func source() string { return ""; }
* func taint() string { return ""; }
* func sink(s string) { }
*
* func test() {
* s := source()
* sink(s) // $ hasValueFlow="s"
* t := "foo" + taint()
* sink(t) // $ hasTaintFlow="t"
* }
* ```
*
* If you are only interested in value flow, then instead of importing `DefaultFlowTest`, you can import
* `ValueFlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig>`. Similarly, if you are only interested in taint flow, then instead of
* importing `DefaultFlowTest`, you can import `TaintFlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig>`. In both cases
* `DefaultFlowConfig` can be replaced by another implementation of `DataFlow::ConfigSig`.
*
* If you need more fine-grained tuning, consider implementing a test using `InlineExpectationsTest`.
* Inline flow tests for Go.
* See `shared/util/codeql/dataflow/test/InlineFlowTest.qll`
*/
import go
import TestUtilities.InlineExpectationsTest
private import codeql.dataflow.test.InlineFlowTest
private import semmle.go.dataflow.internal.DataFlowImplSpecific
private import semmle.go.dataflow.internal.TaintTrackingImplSpecific
private import internal.InlineExpectationsTestImpl
private predicate defaultSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
exists(Function fn | fn.hasQualifiedName(_, ["source", "taint"]) |
source = fn.getACall().getResult()
)
}
private predicate defaultSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(Function fn | fn.hasQualifiedName(_, "sink") | sink = fn.getACall().getAnArgument())
}
module DefaultFlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) { defaultSource(source) }
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) { defaultSink(sink) }
int fieldFlowBranchLimit() { result = 1000 }
}
private module NoFlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) { none() }
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) { none() }
}
module FlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig ValueFlowConfig, DataFlow::ConfigSig TaintFlowConfig> {
module ValueFlow = DataFlow::Global<ValueFlowConfig>;
module TaintFlow = TaintTracking::Global<TaintFlowConfig>;
private module InlineTest implements TestSig {
string getARelevantTag() { result = ["hasValueFlow", "hasTaintFlow"] }
predicate hasActualResult(Location location, string element, string tag, string value) {
tag = "hasValueFlow" and
exists(DataFlow::Node sink | ValueFlow::flowTo(sink) |
sink.hasLocationInfo(location.getFile().getAbsolutePath(), location.getStartLine(),
location.getStartColumn(), location.getEndLine(), location.getEndColumn()) and
element = sink.toString() and
value = "\"" + sink.toString() + "\""
)
or
tag = "hasTaintFlow" and
exists(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink |
TaintFlow::flow(src, sink) and not ValueFlow::flow(src, sink)
|
sink.hasLocationInfo(location.getFile().getAbsolutePath(), location.getStartLine(),
location.getStartColumn(), location.getEndLine(), location.getEndColumn()) and
element = sink.toString() and
value = "\"" + sink.toString() + "\""
)
}
private module FlowTestImpl implements InputSig<GoDataFlow> {
predicate defaultSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
exists(Function fn | fn.hasQualifiedName(_, ["source", "taint"]) |
source = fn.getACall().getResult()
)
}
import MakeTest<InlineTest>
import DataFlow::MergePathGraph<ValueFlow::PathNode, TaintFlow::PathNode, ValueFlow::PathGraph, TaintFlow::PathGraph>
predicate defaultSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(Function fn | fn.hasQualifiedName(_, "sink") | sink = fn.getACall().getAnArgument())
}
predicate flowPath(PathNode source, PathNode sink) {
ValueFlow::flowPath(source.asPathNode1(), sink.asPathNode1()) or
TaintFlow::flowPath(source.asPathNode2(), sink.asPathNode2())
string getArgString(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(src) and
result = "\"" + sink.toString() + "\""
}
}
module DefaultFlowTest = FlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig, DefaultFlowConfig>;
module ValueFlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig ValueFlowConfig> {
import FlowTest<ValueFlowConfig, NoFlowConfig>
}
module TaintFlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig TaintFlowConfig> {
import FlowTest<NoFlowConfig, TaintFlowConfig>
}
import InlineFlowTestMake<GoDataFlow, GoTaintTracking, Impl, FlowTestImpl>

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
private import go as G
private import codeql.util.test.InlineExpectationsTest
module Impl implements InlineExpectationsTestSig {
/**
* A class representing line comments in the Go style, including the
* preceding comment marker (`//`).
*/
class ExpectationComment extends G::Comment {
/** Returns the contents of the given comment, _without_ the preceding comment marker (`//`). */
string getContents() { result = this.getText() }
}
class Location = G::Location;
}

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
failures
edges
| test.go:9:9:9:11 | selection of c [collection] | test.go:9:7:9:11 | <-... |
| test.go:13:16:13:16 | definition of s [pointer, c, collection] | test.go:16:2:16:2 | s [pointer, c, collection] |

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
failures
invalidModelRow
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
failures
invalidModelRow
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
failures
edges
| test.go:14:8:14:15 | call to source | test.go:15:34:15:35 | fi |
| test.go:15:2:15:44 | ... := ...[0] | test.go:16:7:16:12 | header |

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import go
import TestUtilities.InlineExpectationsTest
import TestUtilities.InlineFlowTest
module ValueFlow = DataFlow::Global<DefaultFlowConfig>;

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -3,40 +3,6 @@
* See `shared/util/codeql/util/test/InlineExpectationsTest.qll`
*/
private import java as J
private import codeql.util.test.InlineExpectationsTest
private module Impl implements InlineExpectationsTestSig {
/**
* A class representing line comments in Java, which is simply Javadoc restricted
* to EOL comments, with an extra accessor used by the InlineExpectations core code
*/
abstract class ExpectationComment extends J::Top {
/** Gets the contents of the given comment, _without_ the preceding comment marker (`//`). */
abstract string getContents();
}
private class JavadocExpectationComment extends J::Javadoc, ExpectationComment {
JavadocExpectationComment() { isEolComment(this) }
override string getContents() { result = this.getChild(0).toString() }
}
private class KtExpectationComment extends J::KtComment, ExpectationComment {
KtExpectationComment() { this.isEolComment() }
override string getContents() { result = this.getText().suffix(2).trim() }
}
private class XmlExpectationComment extends ExpectationComment instanceof J::XmlComment {
override string getContents() { result = super.getText().trim() }
override Location getLocation() { result = J::XmlComment.super.getLocation() }
override string toString() { result = J::XmlComment.super.toString() }
}
class Location = J::Location;
}
private import internal.InlineExpectationsTestImpl
import Make<Impl>

View File

@@ -1,119 +1,33 @@
/**
* Provides a simple base test for flow-related tests using inline expectations.
*
* Example for a test.ql:
* ```ql
* import java
* import TestUtilities.InlineFlowTest
* import DefaultFlowTest
* import PathGraph
*
* from PathNode source, PathNode sink
* where flowPath(source, sink)
* select sink, source, sink, "$@", source, source.toString()
* ```
*
* To declare expectations, you can use the $hasTaintFlow or $hasValueFlow comments within the test source files.
* Example of the corresponding test file, e.g. Test.java
* ```java
* public class Test {
*
* Object source() { return null; }
* String taint() { return null; }
* void sink(Object o) { }
*
* public void test() {
* Object s = source();
* sink(s); // $ hasValueFlow
* String t = "foo" + taint();
* sink(t); // $ hasTaintFlow
* }
*
* }
* ```
*
* If you are only interested in value flow, then instead of importing `DefaultFlowTest`, you can import
* `ValueFlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig>`. Similarly, if you are only interested in taint flow, then instead of
* importing `DefaultFlowTest`, you can import `TaintFlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig>`. In both cases
* `DefaultFlowConfig` can be replaced by another implementation of `DataFlow::ConfigSig`.
*
* If you need more fine-grained tuning, consider implementing a test using `InlineExpectationsTest`.
* Inline flow tests for Java.
* See `shared/util/codeql/dataflow/test/InlineFlowTest.qll`
*/
import java
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.DataFlow
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.ExternalFlow
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.TaintTracking
import TestUtilities.InlineExpectationsTest
private import codeql.dataflow.test.InlineFlowTest
private import semmle.code.java.dataflow.internal.DataFlowImplSpecific
private import semmle.code.java.dataflow.internal.TaintTrackingImplSpecific
private import internal.InlineExpectationsTestImpl
private predicate defaultSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
source.asExpr().(MethodAccess).getMethod().getName() = ["source", "taint"]
}
private predicate defaultSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(MethodAccess ma | ma.getMethod().hasName("sink") | sink.asExpr() = ma.getAnArgument())
}
module DefaultFlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) { defaultSource(source) }
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) { defaultSink(sink) }
int fieldFlowBranchLimit() { result = 1000 }
}
private module NoFlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) { none() }
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) { none() }
}
private string getSourceArgString(DataFlow::Node src) {
defaultSource(src) and
src.asExpr().(MethodAccess).getAnArgument().(StringLiteral).getValue() = result
}
module FlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig ValueFlowConfig, DataFlow::ConfigSig TaintFlowConfig> {
module ValueFlow = DataFlow::Global<ValueFlowConfig>;
module TaintFlow = TaintTracking::Global<TaintFlowConfig>;
private module InlineTest implements TestSig {
string getARelevantTag() { result = ["hasValueFlow", "hasTaintFlow"] }
predicate hasActualResult(Location location, string element, string tag, string value) {
tag = "hasValueFlow" and
exists(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink | ValueFlow::flow(src, sink) |
sink.getLocation() = location and
element = sink.toString() and
if exists(getSourceArgString(src)) then value = getSourceArgString(src) else value = ""
)
or
tag = "hasTaintFlow" and
exists(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink |
TaintFlow::flow(src, sink) and not ValueFlow::flow(src, sink)
|
sink.getLocation() = location and
element = sink.toString() and
if exists(getSourceArgString(src)) then value = getSourceArgString(src) else value = ""
)
}
private module FlowTestImpl implements InputSig<JavaDataFlow> {
predicate defaultSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
source.asExpr().(MethodAccess).getMethod().getName() = ["source", "taint"]
}
import MakeTest<InlineTest>
import DataFlow::MergePathGraph<ValueFlow::PathNode, TaintFlow::PathNode, ValueFlow::PathGraph, TaintFlow::PathGraph>
predicate defaultSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
exists(MethodAccess ma | ma.getMethod().hasName("sink") | sink.asExpr() = ma.getAnArgument())
}
predicate flowPath(PathNode source, PathNode sink) {
ValueFlow::flowPath(source.asPathNode1(), sink.asPathNode1()) or
TaintFlow::flowPath(source.asPathNode2(), sink.asPathNode2())
private string getSourceArgString(DataFlow::Node src) {
defaultSource(src) and
src.asExpr().(MethodAccess).getAnArgument().(StringLiteral).getValue() = result
}
string getArgString(DataFlow::Node src, DataFlow::Node sink) {
(if exists(getSourceArgString(src)) then result = getSourceArgString(src) else result = "") and
exists(sink)
}
}
module DefaultFlowTest = FlowTest<DefaultFlowConfig, DefaultFlowConfig>;
module ValueFlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig ValueFlowConfig> {
import FlowTest<ValueFlowConfig, NoFlowConfig>
}
module TaintFlowTest<DataFlow::ConfigSig TaintFlowConfig> {
import FlowTest<NoFlowConfig, TaintFlowConfig>
}
import InlineFlowTestMake<JavaDataFlow, JavaTaintTracking, Impl, FlowTestImpl>

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
private import java as J
private import codeql.util.test.InlineExpectationsTest
module Impl implements InlineExpectationsTestSig {
/**
* A class representing line comments in Java, which is simply Javadoc restricted
* to EOL comments, with an extra accessor used by the InlineExpectations core code
*/
abstract class ExpectationComment extends J::Top {
/** Gets the contents of the given comment, _without_ the preceding comment marker (`//`). */
abstract string getContents();
}
private class JavadocExpectationComment extends J::Javadoc, ExpectationComment {
JavadocExpectationComment() { isEolComment(this) }
override string getContents() { result = this.getChild(0).toString() }
}
private class KtExpectationComment extends J::KtComment, ExpectationComment {
KtExpectationComment() { this.isEolComment() }
override string getContents() { result = this.getText().suffix(2).trim() }
}
private class XmlExpectationComment extends ExpectationComment instanceof J::XmlComment {
override string getContents() { result = super.getText().trim() }
override Location getLocation() { result = J::XmlComment.super.getLocation() }
override string toString() { result = J::XmlComment.super.toString() }
}
class Location = J::Location;
}

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
failures
testFailures
| test.kt:28:14:28:21 | getSecond(...) | Unexpected result: hasTaintFlow=a |
| test.kt:35:14:35:27 | component1(...) | Unexpected result: hasTaintFlow=d |
| test.kt:41:14:41:22 | getSecond(...) | Unexpected result: hasTaintFlow=e |

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
failures
testFailures
invalidModelRow

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import java
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.ExternalFlow
import TestUtilities.InlineFlowTest
import DefaultFlowTest
import ModelValidation

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
failures
testFailures
valueOf

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
import java
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.DataFlow
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.ExternalFlow
import TestUtilities.InlineFlowTest
module OkHttpFlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
import java
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.DataFlow
import semmle.code.java.dataflow.ExternalFlow
import TestUtilities.InlineFlowTest
module FlowConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
failures
testFailures

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More