Merge pull request #3789 from dilanbhalla/cpp

C++ Memory Unsafe Functions

cpp/ql/src/experimental/Security/CWE/CWE-120/MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+///// Library routines /////
+
+int scanf(const char *format, ...);
+int sscanf(const char *str, const char *format, ...);
+int fscanf(const char *str, const char *format, ...);
+
+///// EXAMPLES /////
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+
+    // BAD, do not use scanf without specifying a length first
+    char buf1[10];
+    scanf("%s", buf1);
+
+    // GOOD, length is specified. The length should be one less than the size of the buffer, since the last character is the NULL terminator.
+    char buf2[10];
+    sscanf(buf2, "%9s");
+
+    // BAD, do not use scanf without specifying a length first
+    char file[10];
+    fscanf(file, "%s", buf2);
+
+    return 0;
+}

cpp/ql/src/experimental/Security/CWE/CWE-120/MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.qhelp

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<!DOCTYPE qhelp PUBLIC
+  "-//Semmle//qhelp//EN"
+  "qhelp.dtd">
+<qhelp>
+<overview>
+<p>It is bad practice to use any of the <code>scanf</code> functions without including a specified length within the format parameter, as it will be vulnerable to buffer overflows.</p>
+
+</overview>
+
+<recommendation>
+
+<p>Specify a length within the format string parameter, and make this length one less than the size of the buffer, since the last character should be reserved for the NULL terminator.</p>
+
+</recommendation>
+
+<example>
+<p>The following example demonstrates safe and unsafe uses of <code>scanf</code> type functions.</p>
+<sample src="MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.cpp" />
+
+</example>
+
+<references>
+</references>
+
+</qhelp>

cpp/ql/src/experimental/Security/CWE/CWE-120/MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/**
+ * @name Scanf function without a specified length
+ * @description Use of one of the scanf functions without a specified length.
+ * @kind problem
+ * @problem.severity warning
+ * @id cpp/memory-unsafe-function-scan
+ * @tags reliability
+ *       security
+ *       external/cwe/cwe-120
+ */
+
+import cpp
+import semmle.code.cpp.commons.Scanf
+
+from FunctionCall call, ScanfFunction sff
+where
+  call.getTarget() = sff and
+  call.getArgument(sff.getFormatParameterIndex()).getValue().regexpMatch(".*%l?s.*")
+select call, "Dangerous use of one of the scanf functions"

cpp/ql/test/experimental/query-tests/Security/CWE/semmle/tests/MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+///// Library routines /////
+
+int scanf(const char *format, ...);
+int sscanf(const char *str, const char *format, ...);
+int fscanf(const char *str, const char *format, ...);
+
+///// Test code /////
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+
+    // BAD, do not use scanf without specifying a length first
+    char buf1[10];
+    scanf("%s", buf1);
+
+    // GOOD, length is specified
+    char buf2[10];
+    sscanf(buf2, "%9s");
+
+    // BAD, do not use scanf without specifying a length first
+    char file[10];
+    fscanf(file, "%s", buf2);
+
+    return 0;
+}

cpp/ql/test/experimental/query-tests/Security/CWE/semmle/tests/MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.expected

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+| MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.cpp:14:5:14:9 | call to scanf | Dangerous use of one of the scanf functions |
+| MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.cpp:22:5:22:10 | call to fscanf | Dangerous use of one of the scanf functions |

cpp/ql/test/experimental/query-tests/Security/CWE/semmle/tests/MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.qlref

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+experimental/Security/CWE/CWE-120/MemoryUnsafeFunctionScan.ql