mirror of
https://github.com/github/codeql.git
synced 2025-12-16 16:53:25 +01:00
4f60494019
Surprisingly, the new parser did not support these constructs (and the relevant test was missing this case), so on files that required the new parser we were unable to parse this construct. To fix it, we add `list_pattern` (not to be confused with `pattern_list`) as a `tree-sitter-python` node that results in a `List` node in the AST.
20 lines
201 B
Python
20 lines
201 B
Python
|
|
#foo[bar].baz[(quux := 5)] = 5
|
|
foo = 5
|
|
|
|
baz, quux = 1, 2
|
|
|
|
blah : int = 5
|
|
|
|
just_the_type : float
|
|
|
|
x, y = z, w = 3, 4
|
|
|
|
(a, (b, (c, (d, e)))) = (j, (k, (l, (m, n))))
|
|
|
|
s, *t = u
|
|
|
|
[v, *w] = x
|
|
|
|
o,p, = q,r,
|