mirror of
https://github.com/github/codeql.git
synced 2026-04-23 07:45:17 +02:00
d182eae868
This would have found the problem in https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/15755. As highlighted in the comment in the code, it's not a perfect solution since we don't have an automatic way to ensure we don't introduce a new PhaseDependentFlow use with a new step relation and forget to add it to this consistency check... but I think this consistency check still adds value!