Files
codeql/python/ql/test/experimental/library-tests/CallGraph-implicit-init/example.py
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen f33aff42ad Python: missing result was fixed
2023-08-08 12:14:57 +02:00

23 lines
875 B
Python

"""
Test that we can resolve callables correctly without using explicit __init__.py files
This is not included in the standard `CallGraph/code` folder, since we're testing our
understanding import work properly, so it's better to have a clean test setup that is
obviously correct (the other one isn't in regards to imports).
Technically this is part of PEP 420 -- Implicit Namespace Packages, but does not use the
*real* namespace package feature of allowing source code for a single package to reside
in multiple places.
Maybe this should have been an import resolution test, and not a call-graph test ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Since PEP 420 was accepted in Python 3, this test is Python 3 only.
"""
from foo.bar.a import afunc
from foo_explicit.bar.a import explicit_afunc
afunc() # $ pt,tt="foo/bar/a.py:afunc"
explicit_afunc() # $ pt,tt="foo_explicit/bar/a.py:explicit_afunc"