Files
codeql/python/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/coverage/argumentRoutingTest.ql
yoff 6d930099d4 Python: update dataflow tests for new CFG + shared SSA
Test-side changes accompanying the dataflow migration:

  * Test queries (.ql) and shared test harness (TestSummaries,
    TestTaintLib) qualify CFG / SSA types with Cfg:: / SsaImpl::,
    bridge via AST (Name, Call, ...) instead of legacy NameNode /
    CallNode, and switch GlobalSsaVariable / EssaVariable usages
    to the new adapter API.

  * .expected files updated for legitimate precision and toString
    changes:
      - phi-node def-use edges newly exposed in def_use_counts.
      - scope-exit synthetic use surfaces one extra implicit use
        in use-use-counts.
      - For [empty]/[non-empty] outcome rows added in
        EnclosingCallable.
      - SsaSourceVariable / Global Variable label cosmetics
        normalised throughout.

  * Inline annotations:
      - typetracking/test.py: removed MISSING:tracked on lines
        93/95 (now found), added SPURIOUS:tracked on line 108
        (decorator over-reach).
      - global-flow/test.py: added SPURIOUS writes=g_mod on line
        20 (correctly reports immediately-overwritten write).
      - tainttracking/customSanitizer/test.py: marked
        try/except: ensure_tainted(s) cases as MISSING: tainted
        (no-raise CFG abstraction does not connect try body to
        except body).
      - coverage/test.py: marked
        SINK(return_from_inner_scope([])) as
        MISSING: flow=... pending closer investigation.

  * regression/{dataflow,custom_dataflow}.expected: accept two
    if/else cond-correlation over-reaches (documented limitation;
    same imprecision applies under legacy semantics by design).

After this change the dataflow library-tests stand at 62 of 64
passing; the two remaining failures are tracked under the
ImportStarRefinement workstream.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-26 07:21:06 +00:00

136 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext

import python
private import semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg as Cfg
private import semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.SsaImpl as SsaImpl
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.DataFlow
private import semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.DataFlowPrivate as DataFlowPrivate
import utils.test.dataflow.RoutingTest
module Argument1RoutingTest implements RoutingTestSig {
class Argument = Unit;
string flowTag(Argument arg) { result = "arg1" and exists(arg) }
predicate relevantFlow(DataFlow::Node source, DataFlow::Node sink, Argument arg) {
(
Argument1ExtraRoutingFlow::flow(source, sink)
or
ArgumentRoutingFlow::flow(source, sink) and
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isArgSource(source, 1) and
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isGoodSink(sink, 1)
) and
exists(arg)
}
}
class ArgNumber extends int {
ArgNumber() { this in [1 .. 7] }
}
module ArgumentRoutingConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
additional predicate isArgSource(DataFlow::Node node, ArgNumber argNumber) {
node.(DataFlow::CfgNode).getNode().(Cfg::NameNode).getId() = "arg" + argNumber
}
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node node) { isArgSource(node, _) }
additional predicate isGoodSink(DataFlow::Node node, ArgNumber argNumber) {
exists(Cfg::CallNode call |
call.getFunction().(Cfg::NameNode).getId() = "SINK" + argNumber and
node.(DataFlow::CfgNode).getNode() = call.getAnArg()
)
}
additional predicate isBadSink(DataFlow::Node node, ArgNumber argNumber) {
exists(Cfg::CallNode call |
call.getFunction().(Cfg::NameNode).getId() = "SINK" + argNumber + "_F" and
node.(DataFlow::CfgNode).getNode() = call.getAnArg()
)
}
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node node) { isGoodSink(node, _) or isBadSink(node, _) }
/**
* We want to be able to use `arg` in a sequence of calls such as `func(kw=arg); ... ; func(arg)`.
* Use-use flow lets the argument to the first call reach the sink inside the second call,
* making it seem like we handle all cases even if we only handle the last one.
* We make the test honest by preventing flow into source nodes.
*/
predicate isBarrierIn(DataFlow::Node node) { isSource(node) }
}
module ArgumentRoutingFlow = DataFlow::Global<ArgumentRoutingConfig>;
module Argument1ExtraRoutingConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig {
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node node) {
exists(SsaImpl::AssignmentDefinition def, DataFlow::CallCfgNode call |
def.getDefiningNode() = node.(DataFlow::CfgNode).getNode() and
def.getValue() = call.getNode() and
call.getFunction().asCfgNode().(Cfg::NameNode).getId().matches("With\\_%")
) and
node.(DataFlow::CfgNode).getNode().(Cfg::NameNode).getId().matches("with\\_%")
}
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node node) {
exists(Cfg::CallNode call |
call.getFunction().(Cfg::NameNode).getId() = "SINK1" and
node.(DataFlow::CfgNode).getNode() = call.getAnArg()
)
}
/**
* We want to be able to use `arg` in a sequence of calls such as `func(kw=arg); ... ; func(arg)`.
* Use-use flow lets the argument to the first call reach the sink inside the second call,
* making it seem like we handle all cases even if we only handle the last one.
* We make the test honest by preventing flow into source nodes.
*/
predicate isBarrierIn(DataFlow::Node node) { isSource(node) }
}
module Argument1ExtraRoutingFlow = DataFlow::Global<Argument1ExtraRoutingConfig>;
module RestArgumentRoutingTest implements RoutingTestSig {
class Argument = ArgNumber;
string flowTag(Argument arg) { result = "arg" + arg }
predicate relevantFlow(DataFlow::Node source, DataFlow::Node sink, Argument arg) {
ArgumentRoutingFlow::flow(source, sink) and
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isArgSource(source, arg) and
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isGoodSink(sink, arg) and
arg > 1
}
}
/** Bad flow from `arg<n>` to `SINK<N>_F` */
module BadArgumentRoutingTestSinkF implements RoutingTestSig {
class Argument = ArgNumber;
string flowTag(Argument arg) { result = "bad" + arg }
predicate relevantFlow(DataFlow::Node source, DataFlow::Node sink, Argument arg) {
ArgumentRoutingFlow::flow(source, sink) and
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isArgSource(source, arg) and
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isBadSink(sink, arg)
}
}
/** Bad flow from `arg<n>` to `SINK<M>` or `SINK<M>_F`, where `n != m`. */
module BadArgumentRoutingTestWrongSink implements RoutingTestSig {
class Argument = ArgNumber;
string flowTag(Argument arg) { result = "bad" + arg }
predicate relevantFlow(DataFlow::Node source, DataFlow::Node sink, Argument arg) {
ArgumentRoutingFlow::flow(source, sink) and
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isArgSource(source, any(ArgNumber i | not i = arg)) and
(
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isGoodSink(sink, arg)
or
ArgumentRoutingConfig::isBadSink(sink, arg)
)
}
}
import MakeTest<MergeTests4<MakeTestSig<Argument1RoutingTest>, MakeTestSig<RestArgumentRoutingTest>,
MakeTestSig<BadArgumentRoutingTestSinkF>, MakeTestSig<BadArgumentRoutingTestWrongSink>>>