Files
codeql/python/ql/lib/utils/test/dataflow/NormalTaintTrackingTest.qll
Copilot 3f9c603115 Python: switch dataflow library to new (shared) CFG + SSA
Flips the Python dataflow trunk from the legacy CFG (semmle/python/Flow.qll)
and legacy ESSA SSA (semmle/python/essa/*) to the new shared CFG facade
(semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg) and the new SSA adapter
(semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.SsaImpl), both introduced
additively in the preceding PRs in this stack.

This is the trunk-flip equivalent of the original draft PR #21894 (kept
around as documentation), rebased on top of the four preparatory PRs:

  P1: Remove AstNode.getAFlowNode() and rewrite callers (#21919).
  P2: Qualify Flow.qll's AST references with Py:: prefix (#21920).
  P3: Add new shared-CFG-backed control flow graph (#21921).
  P4: Add new shared-SSA-backed SSA adapter (#21923).

The Python dataflow library (semmle/python/dataflow/new/) now imports
the new CFG facade and SSA adapter. All CFG-typed predicates
(ControlFlowNode, CallNode, BasicBlock, NameNode, AttrNode, ...) are
qualified with the Cfg:: prefix; SSA references switch from
EssaVariable/EssaDefinition to SsaImpl::Definition/SourceVariable.

GuardNode is redesigned to use the new CFG's outcome-node model
(isAfterTrue / isAfterFalse) instead of the legacy ConditionBlock +
flipped indirection. Only BarrierGuard<...> is preserved as public
API.

Framework files (Bottle, FastApi, Django, Tornado, Pyramid, Stdlib,
...) are updated to take CFG nodes from the new facade.

A handful of dataflow consistency tweaks for the new CFG:
- Augmented-assignment targets are treated as both load and store.
- 'from X import *' produces uncertain SSA writes for unknown names.
- CFG nodes are canonicalised so dataflow does not see equivalent
  pre/post-order pairs as distinct nodes.

Two AST tweaks for the new CFG:
- AstNodeImpl: omit PEP 695 type-parameter names from
  FunctionDefExpr / ClassDefExpr children.
- ImportResolution: drop the legacy essa import.

Test churn (~175 files): reblessed library- and query-test .expected
files reflect slightly different CFG granularity, different toString
output, and a handful of true alert deltas in security queries.

Verification: all 367 lib + src + consistency-queries compile clean.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-02 20:01:30 +00:00

35 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

import python
private import semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg as Cfg
import utils.test.dataflow.FlowTest
import utils.test.dataflow.testTaintConfig
private import semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.PrintNode
module DataFlowTest implements FlowTestSig {
string flowTag() { result = "flow" }
predicate relevantFlow(DataFlow::Node source, DataFlow::Node sink) {
TestFlow::flow(source, sink)
}
}
import MakeTest<MakeTestSig<DataFlowTest>>
query predicate missingAnnotationOnSink(Location location, string error, string element) {
error = "ERROR, you should add `# $ MISSING: flow` annotation" and
exists(DataFlow::Node sink |
exists(DataFlow::CallCfgNode call |
// note: we only care about `SINK` and not `SINK_F`, so we have to reconstruct manually.
call.getFunction().asCfgNode().(Cfg::NameNode).getId() = "SINK" and
(sink = call.getArg(_) or sink = call.getArgByName(_))
) and
location = sink.getLocation() and
element = prettyExpr(sink.asExpr()) and
not TestFlow::flowTo(sink) and
not exists(FalseNegativeTestExpectation missingResult |
missingResult.getTag() = "flow" and
missingResult.getLocation().getFile() = location.getFile() and
missingResult.getLocation().getStartLine() = location.getStartLine()
)
)
}