Rasmus Wriedt Larsen 35876f1939 Python: Re-introduce Response::instance() in flask model ...

We don't actually need it for anything right now, but I have plans for the
future where would need it.

Although it would be nice to have it as an `API::Node`, and we could re-write
implementations so we could provide it in this instance, I'm not convinced we
can do that in general right now.

For example, if <n'th> parameter of a function has to be modeled as belonging to
a certain type, I don't see any way to specify that as an API::Node.

For me, that's ok. Until we _can_ specify things like this as API::Nodes in the
future, I would like to keep things consistent, and use `DataFlow::Node` as the
result type.

2021-02-18 15:22:16 +01:00

..

crypto

Python: Autoformat everything using qlformat.

2020-07-07 15:43:52 +02:00

dataflow

Python ESSA: Move all Essa code to semmle.python.essa folder.

2019-08-20 11:41:46 +01:00

files

Python: Autoformat remaining .qll.

2020-03-20 16:43:10 +01:00

python

Python: Re-introduce Response::instance() in flask model

2021-02-18 15:22:16 +01:00