mirror of
https://github.com/github/codeql.git
synced 2025-12-28 22:56:32 +01:00
f07a7bf8cf
Will need subsequent PRs fixing up test failures (due to deprecated methods moving around), but other than that everything should be straight-forward.
31 lines
946 B
Plaintext
31 lines
946 B
Plaintext
/**
|
|
* @name Inconsistent method resolution order
|
|
* @description Class definition will raise a type error at runtime due to inconsistent method resolution order(MRO)
|
|
* @kind problem
|
|
* @tags reliability
|
|
* correctness
|
|
* @problem.severity error
|
|
* @sub-severity high
|
|
* @precision very-high
|
|
* @id py/inconsistent-mro
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import python
|
|
|
|
ClassObject left_base(ClassObject type, ClassObject base) {
|
|
exists(int i | i > 0 and type.getBaseType(i) = base and result = type.getBaseType(i - 1))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
predicate invalid_mro(ClassObject t, ClassObject left, ClassObject right) {
|
|
t.isNewStyle() and
|
|
left = left_base(t, right) and
|
|
left = right.getAnImproperSuperType()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
from ClassObject t, ClassObject left, ClassObject right
|
|
where invalid_mro(t, left, right)
|
|
select t,
|
|
"Construction of class " + t.getName() +
|
|
" can fail due to invalid method resolution order(MRO) for bases $@ and $@.", left,
|
|
left.getName(), right, right.getName()
|