Files
codeql/cpp/ql/test/library-tests/ir/escape
Dave Bartolomeo 4c23ad100e C++: Rename a few IR APIs
There are a few IR APIs that we've found to be confusingly named. This PR renames them to be more consistent within the IR and with the AST API:

`Instruction.getFunction` -> `Instruction.getEnclosingFunction`: This was especially confusing when you'd call `FunctionAddressInstruction.getFunction` to get the function whose address was taken, and wound up with the enclosing function instead.

`Instruction.getXXXOperand` -> `Instruction.getXXX`. Now that `Operand` is an exposed type, we want a way to get a specific `Operand` of an `Instruction`, but more often we want to get the definition instruction of that operand. Now, the pattern is that `getXXXOperand` returns the `Operand`, and `getXXX` is equivalent to `getXXXOperand().getDefinitionInstruction()`.

`Operand.getInstruction` -> `Operand.getUseInstruction`: More consistent with the existing `Operand.getDefinitionInstruction` predicate.
2019-02-06 22:43:49 -08:00
..
2018-09-23 16:23:52 -07:00
2019-02-06 22:43:49 -08:00
2019-02-06 22:43:49 -08:00