This predicate got an unfortunate join order, leading to these tuple
counts on ElektraInitiative/libelektra:
(290s) Tuple counts for AliasedSSA::VariableMemoryLocation::coversEntireVariable_dispred#f:
57117 ~0% {3} r1 = SCAN IRType::IRType::getByteSize_dispred#ff AS I OUTPUT 0, (I.<1> * 8), I.<0>
421445272 ~0% {3} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH AliasedSSA::VariableMemoryLocation#fffffff_5601#join_rhs AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT R.<3>, r1.<2>, R.<2>
103282 ~2% {1} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH AliasConfiguration::Allocation::getIRType_dispred#ff AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT r2.<2>
return r3
With this commit, we get these tuple counts instead:
(0s) Tuple counts for AliasedSSA::VariableMemoryLocation::varIRTypeHasBitRange#bff:
361874 ~0% {3} r1 = SCAN AliasedSSA::VariableMemoryLocation#fffffff AS I OUTPUT I.<1>, 0, I.<0>
361874 ~0% {3} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH AliasConfiguration::Allocation::getIRType_dispred#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT R.<1>, 0, r1.<2>
361874 ~1% {3} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH IRType::IRType::getByteSize_dispred#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT r2.<2>, 0, (R.<1> * 8)
return r3
(0s) Tuple counts for AliasedSSA::VariableMemoryLocation::coversEntireVariable_dispred#f:
103282 ~2% {1} r1 = JOIN AliasedSSA::VariableMemoryLocation#fffffff_056#join_rhs AS L WITH AliasedSSA::VariableMemoryLocation::varIRTypeHasBitRange#bff AS R ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT L.<0>
103282 ~2% {1} r2 = STREAM DEDUP r1
return r2
We had these tuple counts on ElektraInitiative/libelektra (note that the
`modelFlow` predicate got inlined into
`simpleInstructionLocalFlowStep`):
(652s) Tuple counts for DataFlowUtil::simpleInstructionLocalFlowStep#ff:
...
19701 ~1% {4} r27 = JOIN r26 WITH Instruction::SideEffectInstruction::getPrimaryInstruction_dispred#3#ff_10#join_rhs AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT R.<1>, r26.<2>, r26.<1>, r26.<0>
7908 ~0% {3} r28 = JOIN r27 WITH SSAConstruction::Cached::getInstructionIndex#ff@staged_ext AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT r27.<0>, r27.<2>, r27.<3>
4023 ~0% {3} r29 = JOIN r28 WITH Instruction::WriteSideEffectInstruction#class#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT r28.<1>, r28.<2>, r28.<0>
...
1060807009 ~3% {3} r34 = JOIN r33 WITH SSAConstruction::Cached::getInstructionIndex#ff_10#join_rhs AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT R.<1>, r33.<1>, r33.<2>
15670 ~5% {2} r35 = JOIN r34 WITH Instruction::SideEffectInstruction::getPrimaryInstruction_dispred#3#ff AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT r34.<0>, r34.<2>
7973 ~0% {2} r36 = JOIN r35 WITH Instruction::ReadSideEffectInstruction::getSideEffectOperand_dispred#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT R.<1>, r35.<1>
...
In this predicate there are two cases (`WriteSideEffectInstruction` and
`ReadSideEffectInstruction`) where we need to join on both the call and
the argument index of a side effect. It works well enough for the first
case, `WriteSideEffectInstruction`, where the call is joined on before
the index, but it explodes in the second case,
`ReadSideEffectInstruction`, where the index is joined first. To fix the
second case, and to guard against future optimizer accidents in the
first case, this commit changes both of those cases to use a new helper
predicate that makes it possible to join on both columns at once. The
resulting tuple counts are:
(3s) Tuple counts for DataFlowUtil::simpleInstructionLocalFlowStep#ff:
...
7908 ~0% {3} r27 = JOIN r26 WITH DataFlowUtil::getSideEffectFor#fff AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT R.<2>, r26.<2>, r26.<0>
4023 ~0% {3} r28 = JOIN r27 WITH Instruction::WriteSideEffectInstruction#class#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT r27.<1>, r27.<2>, r27.<0>
...
15670 ~5% {2} r33 = JOIN r32 WITH DataFlowUtil::getSideEffectFor#fff AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT R.<2>, r32.<2>
7973 ~0% {2} r34 = JOIN r33 WITH Instruction::ReadSideEffectInstruction::getSideEffectOperand_dispred#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT R.<1>, r33.<1>
...
The bulge is now limited to a factor of two, and that's just because I
didn't write separate versions of `getSideEffectFor` for
`ReadSideEffectInstruction` and `WriteSideEffectInstruction`.
Avoids a Cartesian product on nodes:
```
[2020-02-07 11:01:22] (432s) Tuple counts for dom#DataFlowImpl::TPathNodeSink#ff:
0 ~0% {2} r1 = JOIN DataFlowImpl::Configuration::isSource_dispred#ff AS L WITH DataFlowImpl::Configuration::isSink_dispred#ff AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT R.<1>, R.<0>
101611 ~0% {2} r2 = SCAN DataFlowImpl::PathNodeMid#class#ffffff AS I OUTPUT I.<5>, I.<0>
3534537047 ~3% {3} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH DataFlowImpl::Configuration::isSink_dispred#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT r2.<1>, R.<1>, R.<0>
251 ~41% {3} r4 = JOIN r3 WITH project#DataFlowImpl::pathStep#fffff AS R ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT R.<2>, r3.<2>, r3.<1>
251 ~50% {2} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH DataFlowImpl::TNil#ff_1#join_rhs AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT r4.<2>, r4.<1>
251 ~50% {2} r6 = r1 \/ r5
323 ~67% {3} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH DataFlowImpl::flow#ff AS R ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT r6.<1>, r6.<0>, R.<1>
288 ~58% {3} r8 = SELECT r7 ON r7.<2> >= r7.<0>
251 ~53% {3} r9 = SELECT r8 ON r8.<2> <= r8.<0>
251 ~50% {2} r10 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT r9.<1>, r9.<0>
```
