hohn/codeql
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/github/codeql.git synced 2026-06-08 06:32:28 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
87,608 Commits 1,777 Branches 169 Tags
codeql-cli/v2.25.6
Commit Graph

87608 Commits

This Branch
This Branch
All Branches
Author SHA1 Message Date
Owen Mansel-Chan
f79ffe792e Fix docs: "branch" -> "acceptingValue" 2026-04-14 15:41:02 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
87f2e21ae9 Fix docs: "acceptingvalue" -> "acceptingValue" 2026-04-14 15:37:17 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
6321482a46 Remove mention of extension ID 2026-04-14 15:29:52 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
8081d4602b Use hyphens in column names: "access-path", "accepting-value" 2026-04-14 15:27:42 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
2ecf086333 Include parameters when quoting extensible predicate name 2026-04-14 15:27:41 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
76d165e71e "modelling" -> "modeling" in docs 2026-04-14 15:27:39 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
8f17b73796 Fix link formatting in change notes 2026-04-14 15:27:37 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
6d4e8bfcb2 Correct extensible predicate signatures in docs 
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
 2026-04-14 15:27:35 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
a2a0c087e1 Remove incorrect parameter of extensible predicate 
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
 2026-04-14 15:27:33 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
c86ba38a4e Add change notes 2026-04-14 15:27:31 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
415330d5eb Update docs for barriers and barrier guards 2026-04-14 15:27:29 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
05e3073165 List extensible predicates for barriers and barrier guards 2026-04-14 15:27:27 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
ef9136c053 (Formatting) Remove erroneous bullet point in ruby docs 2026-04-14 15:27:25 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
f02ccd36cc (Trivial) Remove trailing spaces in some docs 2026-04-14 15:27:21 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
6e0bee7471 Merge pull request #21691 from github/dependabot/go_modules/go/extractor/extractor-dependencies-2d1b0e128d 
Bump the extractor-dependencies group across 1 directory with 2 updates
 2026-04-14 15:26:00 +01:00
Henry Mercer
cb1fd76a4c Merge pull request #21658 from github/post-release-prep/codeql-cli-2.25.2 
Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.25.2
 2026-04-14 15:24:13 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
467933bbb1 Rust: Also add specialized IndexMut implementations 2026-04-14 15:45:14 +02:00
Henry Mercer
43c9b95e6f Merge branch 'main' into post-release-prep/codeql-cli-2.25.2 2026-04-14 13:56:52 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
878cfd720c C#: Use inline test expectations 2026-04-14 14:41:28 +02:00
Geoffrey White
666c8bf87a Merge pull request #21635 from geoffw0/suspicioussizeof2 
C++: Upgrade cpp/suspicious-add-sizeof to high precision
 2026-04-14 13:04:24 +01:00
Jeroen Ketema
07b02942db Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into jketema/swift-6.3 2026-04-14 13:54:16 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
9ef088d423 C++: Add change note 2026-04-14 13:46:43 +02:00
Taus
8b1ecf05c9 Python: Update test output 
This change reflects the `(value, key)` to `(key, value)` fix in an
earlier commit.
 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
15790aa00c Python: Add change note 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
de900fc3b5 Python: Add QL test for comprehensions with unpacking 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
fc5b3562c3 Python: Add parser test for comprehensions with unpacking 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
90b64616f7 Python: Also fix (value, key) bug in old parser 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
91d4cf6624 Python: Update python.tsg 
First, we extend the various location overriding hacks to also accept
list and dict splats in various places. Having done this, we then have
to tackle how to actually desugar these new comprehension forms (as this
is what we currently do for the old forms).

As a reminder, a list comprehension like `[x for x in y]` currently gets
desugared into a small local function, something like

```python
def listcomp(a):
    for x in a:
        yield x
listcomp(y)
```

For `[*x for x in y]`, the behaviour we want is that we unpack `x`
before yielding its elements in turn. This is essentially what we would
get if we were to use `yield from x` instead of `yield x` in the above
desugaring, so that's what we do. This also works for set
comprehensions.

For dict comprehensions, it's slightly more complicated. Here, the
generator function instead yields a stream of `(key, value)` tuples.
(And apparently the old parser got this wrong and emitted `(value, key)`
pairs instead, which we faithfully recreated in the new parser as well.
We fix that bug in both parsers while we're at it). So, a bare `yield
from` is not enough, we also need a `.items()` call to get the
double-starred expression to emit its items as a stream of tuples (that
we then `yield from`.

To make this (hopefully) less verbose in the implementation, we defer
the decision of whether to use `yield` or `yield from` by introducing a
`yield_kind` scoped variable that determines the type of the actual AST
node. And of course for dict comprehensions with unpacking we need to
synthesise the extra machinery mentioned above.

On the plus side, this means we don't have to mess with control-flow, as
the existing machinery should be able to handle the desugared syntax
just fine.
 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
97086c3cc9 Python: Regenerate parser files 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
4b5ff0b89e Python: Support unpacking in comprehensions in tree-sitter-python 
This is the easy part -- we just allow `dictionary_splat` or
`list_splat` to appear in the same place as the expression.
 2026-04-14 13:27:31 +02:00
Taus
c748fdf8ee Merge pull request #21694 from github/tausbn/python-add-support-for-pep-810 
Python: Add support for PEP 810
 2026-04-14 13:27:08 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
b749ad645a Merge pull request #21706 from hvitved/rust/type-inference-perf-fixes 
Rust: Improve performance of two type inference predicates
 2026-04-14 13:06:26 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
12868e5140 C++: Remove deprecated code added more than a year ago 2026-04-14 13:03:10 +02:00
Geoffrey White
fe7e8480b2 Merge branch 'main' into suspicioussizeof2 2026-04-14 10:52:00 +01:00
Anders Schack-Mulligen
e0952948ba Merge pull request #21701 from aschackmull/csharp/intvalue 
C#: Introduce Expr.getIntValue.
 2026-04-14 11:23:29 +02:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
7458674470 Merge pull request #21584 from owen-mc/shared/update-mad-comments 
Shared: update code comments explaining models-as-data format to include barriers and barrier guards
 2026-04-14 09:30:28 +01:00
copilot-swe-agent[bot]
3483050526 Fix false positive in MissedSelectOpportunity for async/await loops 
Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/github/codeql/sessions/3e8f4320-2bf4-45f5-b9ea-dad41d522d84

Co-authored-by: hvitved <3667920+hvitved@users.noreply.github.com>
 2026-04-14 08:18:02 +00:00
copilot-swe-agent[bot]
0e66555e37 Initial plan 2026-04-14 08:10:53 +00:00
Jeroen Ketema
0724c22f28 Merge pull request #21702 from jketema/conv-string 
C++: Use new `getConvSpecString` instead of `getConvSpecOffset` and `substring`
 2026-04-14 10:00:51 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
d69be77035 Rust: Avoid expensive regex calls 
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::AssocFunctionCall.hasIncompatibleTarget/5#85c07422@d5eb7r0w was evaluated in 782 iterations totaling 13208ms (delta sizes total: 20187834).
            1464   ~2%    {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::SelfArgIsInstantiationOf::argIsInstantiationOf/6#aaa87ac9#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::OverloadedCallArgsAreInstantiationsOf::argsAreNotInstantiationsOf/2#6a6070f7#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.5, _, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
            1464   ~0%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := ""
            1464   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `FunctionType::AssocFunctionType.getTypeAt/1#dispred#d4d46f61` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Rhs.2

          173691   ~1%    {7} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::OverloadedCallArgsAreInstantiationsOf::argsAreNotInstantiationsOf/2#6a6070f7#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::SelfArgIsInstantiationOf::argIsInstantiationOf/6#aaa87ac9#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.5, _, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4
          173691   ~1%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := ""
          173691   ~1%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `FunctionType::AssocFunctionType.getTypeAt/1#dispred#d4d46f61` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Rhs.2

        20022454   ~0%    {7} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::SelfArgIsInstantiationOf::argIsNotInstantiationOf/6#1b8e512e#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
        20022454   ~0%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := "^([0-9]+)\\..*$"
        20022175   ~2%    {9}    | JOIN WITH PRIMITIVE regexpCapture#bbff ON Lhs.5,Lhs.6
        20022175   ~2%    {10}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.7, In.8, _
                          {9}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.9 := 1, TEST InOut.7 = Tmp.9 KEEPING 9
        20022175   ~1%    {7}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.8, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5
        20022175   ~1%    {8}    | JOIN WITH `UnboundList::Make<Locations::Location,TypeInference::M1::UnboundListInput>::encode/1#47b2ec3f_10#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.0
        20022175   ~0%    {10}    | JOIN WITH `Type::Type.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#ddf0e8ff_10#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.1, _, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, _
                          {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := length(In.8), Tmp.9 := 1, Tmp.6 := (Tmp.6 + Tmp.9), Out.6 := suffix(In.7,Tmp.6) KEEPING 7
        20022175   ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5

        20197330   ~0%    {6} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
        20187834   ~0%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::AssocFunctionCall.hasIncompatibleTarget/5#85c07422#prev`(FIRST 6)
                          return r4
```

After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::AssocFunctionCall.hasIncompatibleTarget/5#85c07422@a58ce91w was evaluated in 537 iterations totaling 382ms (delta sizes total: 20033950).
        19862347   ~0%    {7} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::SelfArgIsInstantiationOf::argIsNotInstantiationOf/6#1b8e512e#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.5, _, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4
        19862347   ~0%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := ""

          174684   ~1%    {7} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::AssocFunctionCall.hasIncompatibleArgsTarget/5#dispred#7d49b9f9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.5, _, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4
          174684   ~1%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := ""

        20037031   ~0%    {7} r3 = r1 UNION r2
        20037031   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `FunctionType::AssocFunctionType.getTypeAt/1#dispred#d4d46f61` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Rhs.2
        20033950   ~0%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::AssocFunctionCall.hasIncompatibleTarget/5#85c07422#prev`(FIRST 6)
                          return r3
```
 2026-04-14 09:51:45 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
0db62b2e68 Type inference: Fix bad join 
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112@d5eb7x9q was evaluated in 471 iterations totaling 24306ms (delta sizes total: 42097188).
        5676156578   ~1%    {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/4#a276e5d4#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.3, _
                            {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 1, Out.4 := (Tmp.4 + In.5), Tmp.6 := 0, TEST Out.4 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
        5676156578   ~1%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.3, In.0, In.2
          41691564   ~1%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.1

          42097188   ~2%    {4} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/4#a276e5d4#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.3, In.0, In.2

          42097188   ~1%    {5} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
                            {4}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.4 KEEPING 4
          41691564   ~1%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3
          41691564   ~1%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3)
                 0   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4

          42097188   ~0%    {6} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, _
                            {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
            405624   ~1%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, _, In.3, In.0, In.2
            405624   ~1%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0
            405624   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, _
            405624   ~1%    {4}    | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0

          42097188   ~1%    {4} r5 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4
          42097188   ~1%    {4}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev`(FIRST 4)
                            return r5
```

After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112@96df1x2u was evaluated in 471 iterations totaling 4058ms (delta sizes total: 42097188).
        42097188   ~0%    {4} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/5#ddfcf430#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2
          405624   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH const_0 ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, _
          405624   ~1%    {4}    | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0

        42097188   ~1%    {6} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3, _
        42097188   ~1%    {4}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4
        41691564   ~1%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/5#ddfcf430#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3

        42097188   ~1%    {6} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/5#ddfcf430#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
                          {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
        41691564   ~1%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3
        41691564   ~1%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3)
               0   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4

        42097188   ~1%    {4} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
        42097188   ~1%    {4}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev`(FIRST 4)
                          return r4
```
 2026-04-14 09:34:13 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
26715fc95c C++: Rename rst to convSpec 2026-04-14 08:03:51 +02:00
dependabot[bot]
b19f2c6874 Bump the extractor-dependencies group in /go/extractor with 2 updates 
Bumps the extractor-dependencies group in /go/extractor with 2 updates: [golang.org/x/mod](https://github.com/golang/mod) and [golang.org/x/tools](https://github.com/golang/tools).


Updates `golang.org/x/mod` from 0.34.0 to 0.35.0
- [Commits](https://github.com/golang/mod/compare/v0.34.0...v0.35.0)

Updates `golang.org/x/tools` from 0.43.0 to 0.44.0
- [Release notes](https://github.com/golang/tools/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/golang/tools/compare/v0.43.0...v0.44.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: golang.org/x/mod
  dependency-version: 0.35.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
  dependency-group: extractor-dependencies
- dependency-name: golang.org/x/tools
  dependency-version: 0.44.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
  dependency-group: extractor-dependencies
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
 2026-04-14 03:04:45 +00:00
murderteeth
47915328e6 Address Copilot review nits 
Fixes US spelling (recognised -> recognized) across docs, QLDoc,
change note, and test fixture comments. Clarifies the handler QLDoc
to note sync/async support. Renames the supported-frameworks entry
from "vercel" to "Vercel (@vercel/node)" to avoid implying broader
platform coverage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-04-13 17:35:08 +00:00
murderteeth
cff07342f5 Recognize legacy @now/node type aliases 
Extends the Vercel serverless handler detection to also match the
deprecated Zeit-era @now/node package with NowRequest/NowResponse
types. Per-review feedback from asgerf, these aliases still appear
in real-world code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-04-13 17:31:29 +00:00
Tom Hvitved
f6fb613962 Merge pull request #21700 from hvitved/js/fastify-per-route-rate-limiting 
JS: Recognize Fastify per-route rate limiting
 2026-04-13 17:28:34 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
e0ce5bcf40 Merge pull request #21699 from jketema/join-fix 
C++: Fix `isCompiledAsC` join order
 2026-04-13 16:03:38 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
19c4b2ff8f C++: Use getConvSpecString instead of getConvSpecOffset and substring 2026-04-13 15:44:41 +02:00
Anders Schack-Mulligen
d3e580fd0e C#: Introduce Expr.getIntValue. 2026-04-13 14:52:38 +02:00
Taus
2eeb31b472 Python: Add tests for lazy from ... import * as well 2026-04-13 11:49:06 +00:00