Tom Hvitved
3c9cbf186e
Rust: Fix bad join in typeParametersEqualFromIndex
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@9c099swn was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 154ms (delta sizes total: 0).
16307861 ~1% {5} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.1
37736 ~1% {7} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.1, _, In.5
0 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (InOut.6 - Tmp.5)
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 6 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {8} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, _, Lhs.5, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6
12808446 ~1% {5} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
22081 ~1% {7} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5
0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.5, _
{8} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5
22081 ~1% {8} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
22081 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.5, _, In.3, In.0, In.1, In.4
22081 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
22081 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
37736 ~1% {8} r7 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
37736 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, _, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
37736 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
37736 ~1% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {6} r8 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7
0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r8
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@81728ywe was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 2ms (delta sizes total: 0).
0 ~0% {6} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {6} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.2, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
66609 ~1% {3} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#reorder_0_4_1_2_3_5#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, _, Rhs.5, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (Tmp.6 + In.7), Tmp.8 := 0, TEST Out.6 != Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.5, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {8} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, In.5, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r5
```
2025-06-11 10:23:57 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
79e1af04df
Rust: Fix bad join in satisfiesConstraintTypeMention
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@e8671rw7 was evaluated in 378 iterations totaling 313ms (delta sizes total: 168323).
462477 ~1% {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
993561 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
993561 ~38% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
772102 ~427% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.4, In.5, In.2, In.6, In.1
56885 ~1% {4} r2 = SCAN TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#prev_delta OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2
0 ~0% {7} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1
462477 ~1% {8} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
993561 ~39% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
23413 ~1% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
2817 ~7% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
11550 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.0, In.5, In.4
66727 ~0% {6} r5 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
19305359 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4
3454881 ~1% {10} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.6, Lhs.8, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7
753104 ~1% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a_01243#join_rhs` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.9, Rhs.4
32040 ~18% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.2
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
13192 ~54% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
13192 ~54% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
13192 ~55% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0
0 ~0% {8} r6 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4
787691 ~403% {6} r7 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6
212766 ~54% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r7
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@9c099xwn was evaluated in 380 iterations totaling 11ms (delta sizes total: 153004).
768937 ~1% {7} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention0/9#c82a4f76#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.5, In.8, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.7
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
745524 ~423% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1
26916 ~0% {9} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, _, Rhs.6, Lhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0
11763 ~1% {9} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4
756515 ~396% {6} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
155599 ~6% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r4
```
2025-06-11 10:04:15 +02:00
