Nora Dimitrijević
2078a34763
Disable diff-informed on InsecureTLSQuery due to DIFF-INFORMED test failures
2025-06-11 18:36:32 +02:00
Nora Dimitrijević
afec8b3153
Swift: mass enable diff-informed data flow
...
An auto-generated patch that enables diff-informed data flow in the obvious cases.
Builds on https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/18343 and https://github.com/github/codeql-patch/pull/88
2025-06-11 18:34:33 +02:00
Ana Scolari
b84f9d6c3c
Update java/ql/src/change-notes/2025-06-10-reduce-precision-for-building-cmdline-with-string-concatenation.md
...
Co-authored-by: Owen Mansel-Chan <62447351+owen-mc@users.noreply.github.com >
2025-06-11 08:55:45 -07:00
Ana Scolari
f915984b01
Update java/ql/src/change-notes/2025-06-10-reduce-precision-for-building-cmdline-with-string-concatenation.md
...
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com >
2025-06-11 08:55:34 -07:00
Paolo Tranquilli
97c2dfe23f
Rust: fix tests
2025-06-11 17:32:43 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
bea5381420
Rust: replace last hand-written instances of Field[crate::
2025-06-11 16:48:39 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
c6c52edbee
MaD generator: tweak the scripts
...
* fix a bug where the order of model generation was determined by the
order in the `download.json` file of the experiment rather than the
order in the config file
* allow configuring `--ram` and `--threads` in the MaD generator scripts
* use no `--ram` and `--threads=0` by default in the bulk generator
(single generator defaults are left unchanged)
* allow to pass `--dca` multiple times, taking DBs from experiments
listed last. This allows to run a subset of the sources in a "fixup"
experiment and use it to "patch" a previous run without rerunning
everything.
2025-06-11 16:42:00 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
051704e59d
Merge branch 'main' into redsun82/rust-mad
2025-06-11 16:39:10 +02:00
Geoffrey White
0c05fa48eb
Rust: Update RegexInjectionExtensions to use getCanonicalPath.
2025-06-11 15:32:23 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
25adcc8f4a
Add Markdown format to guide
2025-06-11 15:03:42 +01:00
Anders Schack-Mulligen
f27e310ba3
Java: Adjust references.
2025-06-11 15:53:02 +02:00
Anders Schack-Mulligen
b3bb71f2e2
Java: Update the CFG for assert statements to make them proper guards.
2025-06-11 15:38:29 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
18392a07ce
Rust: Also apply adjustedAccessType in RelevantAccess
2025-06-11 15:00:35 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
31770edc26
Merge pull request #19725 from hvitved/rust/fix-bad-joins
...
Rust: Fix various bad joins
2025-06-11 14:51:20 +02:00
Asger F
423ffc78db
Merge pull request #19078 from asgerf/js/name-resolution
...
JS: QL-side type/name resolution for TypeScript and JSDoc
2025-06-11 14:17:11 +02:00
Michael Nebel
f038e2f809
Merge pull request #19589 from michaelnebel/csharp/dereference
...
C#: Improve `cs/dereference-*` queries and add to the Code Quality suite.
2025-06-11 13:40:58 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
133aca0773
Rust: Simple type inference for index expressions
2025-06-11 13:15:21 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
301bd44a4c
Rust: Add type inference tests for index expressions
2025-06-11 13:08:59 +02:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
c8a5418969
Remove trailing spaces and extra blank lines
2025-06-11 12:03:17 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
eeaccc5a9a
Update shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll
...
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com >
2025-06-11 12:48:06 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
9f8a3abcff
Rust: Add another type inference debug predicate
2025-06-11 12:44:17 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
b90e8679a9
Shared: Add elaborate QL doc to TypeInference.qll
2025-06-11 12:38:04 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
75caa182f5
Merge pull request #19724 from github/rust/type-inference-borrow
...
Rust: Implement type inference for ref expression as type equality
2025-06-11 12:36:43 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
58266e6ca8
Merge branch 'main' into redsun82/rust-extract-libs
2025-06-11 12:13:10 +02:00
Napalys Klicius
92084dd74f
JS: add js/template-syntax-in-string-literal to the Code Quality suite.
2025-06-11 11:48:05 +02:00
idrissrio
645ce5bbda
C++: update change note after review comments
2025-06-11 11:41:51 +02:00
idrissrio
2bae21cbcd
C++: address review comments
2025-06-11 11:41:50 +02:00
idrissrio
f759550e5a
C++: update stats file
2025-06-11 11:41:49 +02:00
idrissrio
e4a9a5aee8
C++: add upgrade and downgrade scripts
2025-06-11 11:41:48 +02:00
idrissrio
b0c0fb9699
C++: Add change node
2025-06-11 11:41:47 +02:00
idrissrio
cb17a35cbd
C++: Add test to check lambda parameters emptyness
2025-06-11 11:41:46 +02:00
idrissrio
6c9959d8bc
C++: Add predicates for lambda parameter list
2025-06-11 11:41:45 +02:00
idrissrio
3ecc4c9ad7
C++: Adapt existing code to use the new layout of the underlying lambda table
2025-06-11 11:41:44 +02:00
idrissrio
9ac9607cb7
C++: Add boolean for explicit lambda parameter list
2025-06-11 11:41:43 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
fbcd9eaf09
Merge pull request #19674 from github/redsun82/mad
...
Rust: regenerate MaD files using DCA
2025-06-11 11:10:08 +02:00
Napalys Klicius
6811cad687
Merge pull request #19711 from Napalys/js/quality/promote_duplicate_char_class
...
JS: Promote `js/regex/duplicate-in-character-class` to quality
2025-06-11 11:05:07 +02:00
Asger F
e848aa747b
JS: Clarifying comment on commonStep
2025-06-11 10:24:21 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
3c9cbf186e
Rust: Fix bad join in typeParametersEqualFromIndex
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@9c099swn was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 154ms (delta sizes total: 0).
16307861 ~1% {5} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.1
37736 ~1% {7} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.1, _, In.5
0 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (InOut.6 - Tmp.5)
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 6 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {8} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, _, Lhs.5, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6
12808446 ~1% {5} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
22081 ~1% {7} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5
0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.5, _
{8} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5
22081 ~1% {8} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
22081 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.5, _, In.3, In.0, In.1, In.4
22081 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
22081 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
37736 ~1% {8} r7 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
37736 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, _, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
37736 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
37736 ~1% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {6} r8 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7
0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r8
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@81728ywe was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 2ms (delta sizes total: 0).
0 ~0% {6} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {6} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.2, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
66609 ~1% {3} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#reorder_0_4_1_2_3_5#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, _, Rhs.5, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (Tmp.6 + In.7), Tmp.8 := 0, TEST Out.6 != Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.5, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {8} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, In.5, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r5
```
2025-06-11 10:23:57 +02:00
Asger F
2aa5fa17f7
JS: Add comment and examples in FlowImpl doc
2025-06-11 10:21:24 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
79e1af04df
Rust: Fix bad join in satisfiesConstraintTypeMention
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@e8671rw7 was evaluated in 378 iterations totaling 313ms (delta sizes total: 168323).
462477 ~1% {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
993561 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
993561 ~38% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
772102 ~427% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.4, In.5, In.2, In.6, In.1
56885 ~1% {4} r2 = SCAN TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#prev_delta OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2
0 ~0% {7} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1
462477 ~1% {8} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
993561 ~39% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
23413 ~1% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
2817 ~7% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
11550 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.0, In.5, In.4
66727 ~0% {6} r5 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
19305359 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4
3454881 ~1% {10} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.6, Lhs.8, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7
753104 ~1% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a_01243#join_rhs` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.9, Rhs.4
32040 ~18% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.2
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
13192 ~54% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
13192 ~54% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
13192 ~55% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0
0 ~0% {8} r6 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4
787691 ~403% {6} r7 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6
212766 ~54% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r7
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@9c099xwn was evaluated in 380 iterations totaling 11ms (delta sizes total: 153004).
768937 ~1% {7} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention0/9#c82a4f76#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.5, In.8, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.7
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
745524 ~423% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1
26916 ~0% {9} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, _, Rhs.6, Lhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0
11763 ~1% {9} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4
756515 ~396% {6} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
155599 ~6% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r4
```
2025-06-11 10:04:15 +02:00
Geoffrey White
ecac0dbe69
Rust: Accept consistency check failures.
2025-06-11 08:52:52 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
f9915e66a7
Rust: Fix bad join in satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@061312x0 was evaluated in 367 iterations totaling 3484ms (delta sizes total: 563408).
66609 ~0% {3} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.0
867138261 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_210#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1
29320 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
29320 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.3, In.2, In.0
29320 ~0% {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
{4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.4 KEEPING 4
29320 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, _, In.3
29320 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3)
29296 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
29320 ~0% {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, _, In.1, In.0, In.3
0 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0
0 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _
0 ~0% {4} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0
563353 ~1% {4} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3
563353 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, _, Lhs.3, _
{4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4
563353 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.0, In.1
258647 ~1% {5} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
102998 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3
52485 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
258647 ~0% {5} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.1
259340 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4
16033 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.1
{6} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
15992 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.1, In.5, In.2, In.0, In.4
68477 ~1% {6} r7 = r5 UNION r6
68477 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.5
465635 ~0% {3} r8 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.2
465635 ~0% {5} r9 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0
465635 ~1% {5} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
275069 ~0% {5} r11 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Rhs.1, Rhs.2
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.3, _
0 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.1 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5
0 ~0% {5} r12 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.4, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3
465635 ~1% {5} r13 = r10 UNION r12
94444 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0
6 ~20% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
465635 ~0% {5} r14 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, _, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
0 ~0% {5} r15 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3, In.4
465635 ~1% {5} r16 = r14 UNION r15
465635 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
465635 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0
{6} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
465629 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.4, In.3, In.5, In.0
465635 ~1% {6} r17 = r13 UNION r16
465635 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.3
563408 ~1% {4} r18 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r7 UNION r17
563408 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r18
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@e8671bx7 was evaluated in 376 iterations totaling 245ms (delta sizes total: 563353).
563353 ~1% {6} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3, _
563353 ~1% {4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4
259340 ~1% {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
52485 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
259340 ~1% {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
16033 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
15992 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4
741397 ~1% {7} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
465635 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 = Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
465635 ~1% {5} r5 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.1, In.5, In.0, In.2, _
465635 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0
741397 ~1% {7} r6 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
275762 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {7} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5
0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
465635 ~0% {5} r8 = r5 UNION r7
6 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
29310 ~0% {5} r9 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#reorder_0_4_5_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5
29310 ~0% {6} r10 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.0, In.3, _
0 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0
29310 ~0% {6} r11 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
29310 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, _, In.1, In.4
29310 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.3)
29241 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.5
29241 ~0% {5} r12 = r10 UNION r11
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
29241 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4
465635 ~0% {6} r13 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, _
465635 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {8} r14 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _
{8} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, In.3
465635 ~1% {6} r15 = r13 UNION r14
465635 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
465629 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4
563353 ~1% {4} r16 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r8 UNION r12 UNION r15
563353 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r16
```
2025-06-11 09:15:17 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
bc60d033e5
Rust: Fix bad join in inferAccessType
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4@202c46xq was evaluated in 600 iterations totaling 2282ms (delta sizes total: 5827084).
120407742 ~1% {4} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Access.getTarget/0#dispred#29d66fd1#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::accessDeclarationPositionMatch/2#6c58c89d` CARTESIAN PRODUCT OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Rhs.0, Lhs.0
6495868 ~109% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.2
{4} | AND NOT Type::TypeParameter#f85657da(FIRST 1)
3049994 ~10% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.3, In.0
7891 ~0% {5} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::explicitTypeMatch/5#98ce2c39#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
4445 ~3% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5
4445 ~3% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
4445 ~5% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2
3553075 ~1% {5} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::directTypeMatch/5#319f8680#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
6860451 ~16% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5
6860451 ~19% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
6211129 ~20% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2
115218 ~1% {5} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::typeConstraintBaseTypeMatch/5#ebeb4216#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
181668 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5
181668 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
181668 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2
9447236 ~16% {4} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
5902300 ~4% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r5
```
Afer
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4@061316x0 was evaluated in 600 iterations totaling 1727ms (delta sizes total: 5918371
2025-06-11 09:15:16 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
8c956647de
Rust: Fix bad join in fileImport
...
Before
```
Evaluated relational algebra for predicate PathResolution::fileImport/2#d9e57816@c790f609 with tuple counts:
241 ~0% {3} r1 = JOIN `_Locatable::Locatable.getFile/0#dispred#f7e24934_PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032#shared` WITH `FileSystem::Folder::Append<PathResolution::shouldAppend>::append/2#beb8f79a_201#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.1
291 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::pathAttrImport/3#88463ffa_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2
14978 ~8% {2} r2 = SCAN `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` OUTPUT In.0, In.1
14978 ~8% {2} | STREAM DEDUP
14392 ~9% {2} r3 = r2 AND NOT `PathResolution::modImportNested/3#991244df_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
14392 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0
14355 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf_120#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
14978 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0
329862 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf_102#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Rhs.1
577 ~3% {4} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImportNestedLookup/3#6cc4b913#ffb` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0
14932 ~0% {4} r5 = r3 UNION r4
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0
15223 ~0% {2} r6 = r1 UNION r5
return r6
```
Afer
```
Evaluated relational algebra for predicate PathResolution::fileImport/2#d9e57816@007bd81i with tuple counts:
241 ~0% {3} r1 = JOIN `_Locatable::Locatable.getFile/0#dispred#f7e24934_PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032#shared` WITH `FileSystem::Folder::Append<PathResolution::shouldAppend>::append/2#beb8f79a_201#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.1
291 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::pathAttrImport/3#88463ffa_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2
14978 ~8% {2} r2 = SCAN `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` OUTPUT In.0, In.1
14978 ~8% {2} | STREAM DEDUP
14392 ~9% {2} r3 = r2 AND NOT `PathResolution::modImportNested/3#991244df_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
14392 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0
14978 ~9% {3} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.0, Lhs.1
577 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImportNestedLookup/3#6cc4b913#ffb` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.0
14969 ~1% {3} r5 = r3 UNION r4
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef_120#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0
15223 ~0% {2} r6 = r1 UNION r5
return r6
```
2025-06-11 09:15:14 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
63aac1babb
Rust: Fix bad join in getCanonicalPath
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6@5132b1w8 was evaluated in 107 iterations totaling 1217ms (delta sizes total: 870557).
568160 ~1% {2} r1 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::AssocItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#120fa1ad_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
564597 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
68670 ~1% {2} r2 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::VariantItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#12012145_project#PathResolution::ItemNod__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
68670 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#5` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
49047 ~1% {2} r3 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::StructItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f482e99c_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
49047 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#2` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
229 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::UnionItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f67c4b73_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
229 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#4` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
12207 ~0% {2} r5 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::EnumItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#03ce35b1_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
12207 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::EnumItemNode.getName/0#dispred#f21ce0ed_PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathP__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
26698 ~2% {2} r6 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ModuleItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#2fee2540_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
26698 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
6315 ~1% {2} r7 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::TraitItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#824f98e3_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
6315 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
112374 ~0% {3} r8 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanoni__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _
112374 ~3% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 3
872046 ~1% {2} r9 = SCAN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0
777662505 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#4e7c51c6_10#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.0
150127 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.resolveSelfTy/0#dispred#cf157d04` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, _
150127 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 1
262501 ~1% {3} r10 = r8 UNION r9
230996 ~1% {5} r11 = JOIN r10 WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, _, _
230996 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 4, Out.4 := 0
{3} r12 = r10 AND NOT `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
31487 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, _
31487 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 2, Out.4 := 0
262483 ~0% {5} r13 = r11 UNION r12
262483 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH PRIMITIVE range#bbb ON Lhs.4,Lhs.3,Lhs.2
262483 ~0% {3} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1
142807 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_PathResolution::Imp__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3
870570 ~1% {3} r14 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7 UNION r13
870566 ~1% {3} | AND NOT `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev`(FIRST 3)
return r14
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6@90aba2wd was evaluated in 100 iterations totaling 28ms (delta sizes total: 870531).
568160 ~0% {2} r1 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::AssocItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#120fa1ad_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
564597 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
68670 ~0% {2} r2 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::VariantItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#12012145_project#PathResolution::ItemNod__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
68670 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#5` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
49047 ~0% {2} r3 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::StructItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f482e99c_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
49047 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#2` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
229 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::UnionItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f67c4b73_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
229 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#4` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
12207 ~1% {2} r5 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::EnumItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#03ce35b1_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
12207 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::EnumItemNode.getName/0#dispred#f21ce0ed_PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathP__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
26698 ~0% {2} r6 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ModuleItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#2fee2540_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
26698 ~4% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
6315 ~1% {2} r7 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::TraitItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#824f98e3_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
6315 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
150127 ~0% {3} r8 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getSelfCanonicalPath/1#dispred#8ed81fbe#prev_delta` WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#4e7c51c6` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _
150127 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 1
112374 ~1% {3} r9 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanoni__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _
112374 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 3
262501 ~0% {3} r10 = r8 UNION r9
230996 ~1% {5} r11 = JOIN r10 WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, _, _
230996 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 4, Out.4 := 0
{3} r12 = r10 AND NOT `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
31487 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, _
31487 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 2, Out.4 := 0
262483 ~1% {5} r13 = r11 UNION r12
262483 ~1% {5} | JOIN WITH PRIMITIVE range#bbb ON Lhs.4,Lhs.3,Lhs.2
262483 ~0% {3} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1
142772 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_PathResolution::Imp__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3
870535 ~1% {3} r14 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7 UNION r13
870531 ~1% {3} | AND NOT `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev`(FIRST 3)
return r14
```
2025-06-11 09:15:13 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
01701de4a7
Rust: Implement type inference for ref expression as type equality
2025-06-11 09:09:22 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
3fed7f5397
Merge pull request #19714 from hvitved/rust/fix-bad-join
...
Rust: Fix bad join
2025-06-11 09:08:52 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
8f5d9d7702
Rust: Add type inference tests for borrowing
2025-06-11 08:40:15 +02:00
Ana Scolari
510bbac0e4
Create 2025-06-10-reduce-precision-for-building-cmdline-with-string-concatenation.md
2025-06-10 16:17:32 -07:00
Ana Scolari
857b51be58
Update ExecUnescaped.ql - causing FPs with hard coded strings
...
This query is generating False positives with hard coded strings declared within the function - issue reported by customer. We had a discussion on code_scanning channel on 6/5/25 and the team agreed upon reducing its precision to Medium.
2025-06-10 16:06:22 -07:00
