Using API graphs instead of points-to.
Unfortunately, some results will be lost because of this, due to the
fact that points-to tracks bitwise operations on small numbers (i.e.
flags), whereas API graphs does no such thing. This means using
something like `stat.S_IWUSR | stat.S_IWGRP` will not work.
A custom type tracker (like the one used for `re` flags) could be used
to recapture this behaviour, but I think that's best left as future
work, as it's not clear to me that this query is actually worth the
effort it would take to implement this.
This is solving a papercut, where the C++ build was relying on the
local dbscheme file to be up-to-date, even if all the information for
building is actually in `schema.yml`. This made a pure C++ development
cycle with changes to `schema.yml` clumsy, as it required a further
dbscheme generation step.
Now for C++ the dbscheme is generated internally in the build files, and
thus a change in `schema.yml` is reflected immediately in the C++ build.
A `swift/codegen` step for checked in generated code (including the
dbscheme) is still required, but a developer can do it just before
running QL tests or committing, instead of during each C++
recompilation.
Some directory reorganization was also carried out, moving specific
generator modules to a new `generators` python package, and only leaving
the two drivers at the top level.
This allows to avoid bypassing label type correcness in the extractor,
and allows to independently resolve TBD extractions, as with this
approach TBD nodes do have the correctly typed trap label. The TBD
status is now a predicate on the QL side.
This requires:
* a default visit using the correct type, which is achieved via macro
metaprogramming in `VisitorBase.h`, following the way
`swift::ASTVisitor` is programmed
* a mapping from labels to corresponding binding trap entries. The
functor is defined in `TrapTagTraits.h` and instantiated in generated
`TrapEntries.h`
* Binding trap entries for TBD unknown entities must not have any other
field than the `id` (after all, we are supposed to not extract them
yet). This is why all unextracted fields in `schema.yml` have been
commented out, and will be uncommentend when visitors are added