Tom Hvitved
0db62b2e68
Type inference: Fix bad join
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112@d5eb7x9q was evaluated in 471 iterations totaling 24306ms (delta sizes total: 42097188).
5676156578 ~1% {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/4#a276e5d4#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.3, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 1, Out.4 := (Tmp.4 + In.5), Tmp.6 := 0, TEST Out.4 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
5676156578 ~1% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.3, In.0, In.2
41691564 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.1
42097188 ~2% {4} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/4#a276e5d4#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.3, In.0, In.2
42097188 ~1% {5} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
{4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.4 KEEPING 4
41691564 ~1% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3
41691564 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3)
0 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
42097188 ~0% {6} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
405624 ~1% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, _, In.3, In.0, In.2
405624 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0
405624 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::ArgumentTypeAndBlanketOffset,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::AssocFunctionResolution::ArgSatisfiesBlanketLikeConstraint::SatisfiesBlanketConstraint::Inp>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::getNthTypeParameter/2#40c66343` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, _
405624 ~1% {4} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0
42097188 ~1% {4} r5 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4
42097188 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r5
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112@96df1x2u was evaluated in 471 iterations totaling 4058ms (delta sizes total: 42097188).
42097188 ~0% {4} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/5#ddfcf430#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2
405624 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH const_0 ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, _
405624 ~1% {4} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0
42097188 ~1% {6} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3, _
42097188 ~1% {4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4
41691564 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/5#ddfcf430#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
42097188 ~1% {6} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersEqual/5#ddfcf430#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
41691564 ~1% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3
41691564 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3)
0 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
42097188 ~1% {4} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
42097188 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::SatisfiesConstraintWithTypeMatching<TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeMention::TypeMention,TypeInference::FunctionCallMatching::AccessConstraint::SatisfiesTypeParameterConstraintInput>::TermIsInstantiationOfCondition::typeParametersHaveEqualInstantiationToIndex/4#dde26112#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r4
```
2026-04-14 09:34:13 +02:00
