The conflicts came from how `this` is now a parameter but not a
`Parameter` on `master`.
Conflicts:
cpp/ql/src/semmle/code/cpp/ir/dataflow/internal/DataFlowUtil.qll
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/defaulttainttracking.cpp
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/tainted.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/test_diff.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/dataflow-tests/dataflow-ir-consistency.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/fields/ir-flow.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/syntax-zoo/dataflow-ir-consistency.expected
The virtual-dispatch code for globals was missing any relationship
between the union field access and the global variable, which meant it
propagated function-pointer flow between any two fields of a global
struct. This resulted in false positives from
`cpp/tainted-format-string` on projects using SDL, such as
WohlSoft/PGE-Project.
In addition to fixing that bug, this commit also brings the code up to
date with the new style of modeling flow through global variables:
`DataFlow::Node.asVariable()`.
This test demonstrates that IR data flow conflates unrelated fields of a
global struct-typed variable and that this bug is not present in the old
AST-based implementation of `semmle.code.cpp.security.TaintTracking`.
This cleans up the test results, which were confusing because functions
like `sink` had multiple locations.
There are some additional results now involving casts to `const char *`
because previously it varied whether `sink` used `const`, and now it
always does.
