The legacy CFG emitted two ControlFlowNodes for `x[i] += 42` (one load,
one store, with `load.strictlyDominates(store)`). The new CFG collapses
them to a single canonical node, mirroring Java's single-`VarAccess`
model where `isVarRead`/`isVarWrite` are non-disjoint on the same
expression. Reconcile two legacy two-node behaviours with the merged
single-node world:
1. `Cfg::ControlFlowNode.isLoad()` no longer excludes augmented
targets — both `isLoad` and `isStore` hold on the merged canonical
node, matching Java. `NameNode.defines` drops the now-redundant
`not isLoad` guard; `Py::Name.defines` already filters by
`isDefinition` (Store/Param/AugAssign-target ctx).
2. `LocalFlow::definitionFlowStep` is restricted to NameNode targets,
matching legacy ESSA's `assignment_definition` which required
`defn.(NameNode).defines(v)`. Subscript and attribute writes
(`x[i] = 42`, `obj.attr = 42`) no longer emit a local-flow step
*into* the LHS expression — that flow is handled by the AttrWrite
and content-flow machinery. This is essential for keeping augmented
Subscript/Attribute targets classifiable as `LocalSourceNode` on
the read side, which the API graph requires for emitting Use edges.
`StoreLoadTest.ql` is updated to filter `isAugLoad` out of the regular
`load` tag, mirroring the pre-existing `not isAugStore` filter on the
`store` tag so augmented-assignment expectations remain
`augload=n augstore=n` (not also `load=n store=n`).
Closes the three remaining ApiGraphs library-test failures
(`getSubscript.ql` semantically, plus cosmetic toString updates in
`ModuleImportWithDots.ql` and `test_crosstalk.ql`).
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
In the legacy CFG the same Python 'Name' that is the target of an
augmented assignment has two distinct CFG nodes — a load node (context
3) earlier in the basic block and a store node (context 5) later.
'augstore(load, store)' relates the pair via dominance.
The new (shared) CFG canonicalises each AST expression to a single
CFG node, so 'load' and 'store' collapse to one. The dominance-based
'augstore' from the legacy implementation no longer holds (it would
require 'load.strictlyDominates(load)'), so 'isAugLoad' / 'isAugStore'
never fired and 'isStore' missed the AugAssign target entirely.
Redefines 'augstore' as reflexive on the AugAssign target's canonical
CFG node. With this change:
* isAugLoad / isAugStore both fire on the single canonical node.
* isStore fires (via 'or augstore(_, this)') — matching the legacy
classification that an augmented-assignment target is a store.
* isLoad does not fire (excluded by 'not augstore(_, this)').
Adds 'python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/store-load/' covering
plain load/store/delete, parameters, augmented assignment, tuple
unpacking, attribute and subscript stores. The test asserts the
classification directly on the new-CFG facade.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds 'dead_under_no_raise.py' to the bindings test suite, capturing the
three CPython patterns where bindings legitimately have no CFG node
because the surrounding code is unreachable under the 'no expressions
raise' abstraction:
1. Statements after a 'try: return X; except: pass' block.
2. The 'else:' clause of a try whose body always raises.
3. Cache-lookup pattern 'try: return cache[k]; except: pass' followed
by computation and store.
These bindings intentionally carry no 'cfgdefines=' annotations. If
raise modelling is later added to the CFG, the BindingsTest will surface
the new CFG nodes as unexpected results and this file will need to be
revisited.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds CFG coverage for the binding 'Name's introduced by PEP 695
type-parameter syntax on functions, classes, and 'type' aliases:
def func[T](...): ...
class Box[T]: ...
def multi[T: int, *Ts, **P](...): ...
type Alias[T] = ...
For each parametrised AST node, the type-parameter names (and, for
'type' aliases, the alias name itself) are added as children of the
enclosing CFG node so that 'Name.defines(v)' has a corresponding
position. Bounds and defaults are intentionally not wired (they have
no SSA-relevant semantics for our purposes).
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds `ImportStmt` and `ImportStarStmt` wrappers in `AstNodeImpl.qll`.
For each `Alias` in an import statement, both the value (module/member
expression) and the bound `asname` Name become children of the CFG node
for the import statement, in evaluation order.
Without this, every `Name` introduced by `import` / `from .. import ..`
lacked a CFG node, even though `Name.defines(v)` returns true for it on
the AST side. This was the highest-volume gap: 20,332 missing import
aliases across CPython.
Removes the corresponding MISSING: annotations from imports.py.
Verified: all 24 ControlFlow/evaluation-order tests still pass.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Implements `AstSig::Parameter` and `callableGetParameter(c, i)` in
`AstNodeImpl.qll`, following the C# template
(`csharp/.../ControlFlowGraph.qll:147-156`) rather than Java's
`Parameter() { none() }`.
Each Python parameter (positional, *args, keyword-only, **kwargs) now
becomes a CFG node at a stable position in the enclosing callable's
entry sequence. Defaults still evaluate at function-definition time
via `FunctionDefExpr.getDefault` / `LambdaExpr.getDefault`, so
`Parameter::getDefaultValue()` returns `none()` (the shared CFG
library calls this to model the missing-argument fallback, which
Python does not surface at the CFG level).
The bindings test now exercises parameters (the `py_expr_contexts(_, 4, ...)`
exclusion has been removed). A new `parameters.py` test case covers
positional, defaulted, vararg, kwarg, keyword-only, kitchen-sink,
method (self/cls), lambda, and PEP 570 positional-only parameters.
Several other test files were updated to annotate parameters that the
test had previously hidden (synthetic `.0` comprehension parameter,
method `self`, decorator `f`, etc.).
Verified:
- All 24 ControlFlow/evaluation-order tests still pass.
- CFG consistency query (`python/ql/consistency-queries/CfgConsistency.ql`)
shows zero violations on CPython.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds an `AnnAssignStmt` wrapper in `AstNodeImpl.qll` so that PEP 526
annotated assignments (`x: int = 1`, `x: int`) participate in the
control flow graph. Evaluation order follows CPython: annotation,
optional value, target binding.
Without this, `x: int = 1` had no CFG node for `x` even though
`Name.defines(v)` returns true for it on the AST side. SSA built on
the new CFG would therefore miss every annotated-assignment write.
Removes the corresponding MISSING: annotations from the CFG-binding
gap test:
- annassign.py — all four cases now green.
- match_pattern.py — class-body annotated fields (`x: int`, `y: int`).
- type_params.py — `item: T` inside class.
Verified: all 24 ControlFlow/evaluation-order tests still pass.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds inline-expectation tests for the new shared CFG implementation in
python/ql/lib/semmle/python/controlflow/internal/AstNodeImpl.qll,
covering every Python binding construct that introduces a variable.
The test files use MISSING: annotations to record bindings whose
defining Name AST node is *not* currently reachable from the new CFG.
These are the 'red' half of red-green commit pairs: subsequent commits
will extend AstNodeImpl to cover each construct and remove the
corresponding MISSING: marker.
Confirmed-broken categories:
- Import aliases (from x import a)
- Annotated assignment (x: int = 1)
- Exception handler (except E as e)
- Match patterns (case x, case [a,b], case ... as v)
- PEP 695 type params (def f[T], class C[T])
Confirmed-working (no MISSING:):
- Compound targets, with-as, comprehensions, decorated def/class,
walrus, starred.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Add two default predicates to AstSig:
default AstNode getWhileElse(WhileStmt loop) { none() }
default AstNode getForeachElse(ForeachStmt loop) { none() }
When defined, the explicit-step rules for While/Do and Foreach
route the loop's normal-completion exits through the else block
before reaching the after-loop node:
- WhileStmt: after-false condition -> before-else -> after-while
(instead of directly after-while).
- ForeachStmt: after-collection [empty] and the LoopHeader exit
are both routed through before-else -> after-foreach.
Python's Ast module overrides the predicates to return the
synthetic BlockStmt for the orelse slot, replacing the previous
customisations in Input::step. This eliminates parallel direct
successors emitted by the previous Python-side step additions
(verified: multipleSuccessors on a CPython database goes from
1340 to 0).
Java and C# CFG tests are unaffected.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently we only instantiate them with the old CFG library, but in the
future we'll want to do this with the new library as well.
Co-authored-by: yoff <yoff@github.com>
This one is potentially a bit iffy -- it checks for a very powerful
propetry (that implies many of the other queries), but as the test
results show, it can produce false positives when there is in fact no
problem. We may want to get rid of it entirely, if it becomes too noisy.
This looks for nodes annotated with `t.never` in the test that are
reachable in the CFG. This should not happen (it messes with various
queries, e.g. the "mixed returns" query), but the test shows that in a
few particular cases (involving the `match` statement where all cases
contain `return`s), we _do_ have reachable nodes that shouldn't be.
This one demonstrates a bug in the current CFG. In a dictionary
comprehension `{k: v for k, v in d.items()}`, we evaluate the value
before the key, which is incorrect. (A fix for this bug has been
implemented in a separate PR.)
These use the annotated, self-verifying test files to check various
consistency requirements.
Some of these may be expressing the same thing in different ways, but
it's fairly cheap to keep them around, so I have not attempted to
produce a minimal set of queries for this.
These tests consist of various Python constructions (hopefully a
somewhat comprehensive set) with specific timestamp annotations
scattered throughout. When the tests are run using the Python 3
interpreter, these annotations are checked and compared to the "current
timestamp" to see that they are in agreement. This is what makes the
tests "self-validating".
There are a few different kinds of annotations: the basic `t[4]` style
(meaning this is executed at timestamp 4), the `t.dead[4]` variant
(meaning this _would_ happen at timestamp 4, but it is in a dead
branch), and `t.never` (meaning this is never executed at all).
In addition to this, there is a query, MissingAnnotations, which checks
whether we have applied these annotations maximally. Many expression
nodes are not actually annotatable, so there is a sizeable list of
excluded nodes for that query.
The ones that no longer require points-to no longer import
`LegacyPointsTo`. The ones that do use the specific
`...MetricsWithPointsTo` classes that are applicable.
In hindsight, having a `.getMetrics()` method that just returns `this`
is somewhat weird. It's possible that it predates the existence of the
inline cast, however.
I'm beginning to realise why I didn't do the `toString` overriding way
back when. Thankfully, now that all of our tests are in the same place,
this is actually not a terrible ordeal.
