hohn/codeql
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/github/codeql.git synced 2025-12-16 16:53:25 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
84,016 Commits 1,671 Branches 157 Tags
b31dfdd5f4d30bd0c163c7955a6b7a9d9d024aaf
Commit Graph

93 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
github-actions[bot]
4014df9a6e Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.23.4 2025-11-04 17:57:52 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
64fcdd1f2f Release preparation for version 2.23.4 2025-11-03 14:52:23 +00:00
Simon Friis Vindum
b189f1fe3f Rust: Refactor using shared constraint satisfaction 2025-10-30 08:18:12 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
b7293541cd Merge pull request #20704 from hvitved/rust/fix-bad-joins 
Rust: Fix two bad joins
 2025-10-29 11:11:54 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
b3bbe78974 Rust: Fix bad join 
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch/6#f0fb0b61@31ee5u2w was evaluated in 821 iterations totaling 1057ms (delta sizes total: 689971).
           416937   ~1%    {6} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch0/6#dfcc7717#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.3, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.5

           222757   ~2%    {8} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.2
                           {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
           164360   ~3%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

        315350783   ~1%    {6} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch0/6#dfcc7717#prev` OUTPUT In.0, In.3, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.5

           593815   ~1%    {8} r4 = JOIN r3 WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev_delta` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.2
                           {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
           342226   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

           826517   ~0%    {8} r5 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.4, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.3
                           {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
           345294   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

            73715   ~0%    {8} r6 = JOIN r3 WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev_delta` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.4, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.3
                           {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
            47802   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

           899682   ~5%    {6} r7 = r2 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6
           711040   ~6%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch/6#f0fb0b61#prev`(FIRST 6)
                           return r7
```

After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch/6#f0fb0b61@ad458u2w was evaluated in 821 iterations totaling 374ms (delta sizes total: 691168).
        222757   ~2%    {8} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch0/6#dfcc7717#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.2
                        {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
        164360   ~3%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

        593815   ~1%    {8} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch0/6#dfcc7717#prev` WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev_delta` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.2
                        {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
        342226   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

        826517   ~0%    {8} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch0/6#dfcc7717#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.4, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.3
                        {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
        345294   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

         73715   ~0%    {8} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch0/6#dfcc7717#prev` WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev_delta` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.4, _, Lhs.4, Rhs.3
                        {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(In.6,Tmp.5,In.7) KEEPING 6
         47802   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.5, In.4, In.3

        899682   ~5%    {6} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
        711095   ~6%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::directTypeMatch/6#f0fb0b61#prev`(FIRST 6)
                        return r5
```
 2025-10-28 13:09:39 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
104ba0e291 Rust: Fix bad join 
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#e8abf748@ada3a07w was evaluated in 801 iterations totaling 31ms (delta sizes total: 182871).
           50151   ~1%    {4} r1 = SCAN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev_delta OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, In.4
           39574   ~0%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.2, Rhs.2
                          {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
           36996   ~0%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

        36102333   ~0%    {4} r2 = SCAN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, In.4
           90175   ~1%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev_delta` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.2, Rhs.2
                          {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
           65014   ~1%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

           50151   ~1%    {5} r3 = SCAN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev_delta OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.1, In.3, In.4
           24208   ~1%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `FunctionType::FunctionPosition.isSelf/0#dispred#9e84d302` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
           95022   ~0%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, _, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, _
                          {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := ";", Tmp.5 := (In.6 ++ Tmp.5), Tmp.8 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(Tmp.5,Tmp.8,In.7) KEEPING 6
           93919   ~1%    {7}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
                          {6}    | REWRITE WITH NOT [NOT [Tmp.6 := "borrow", TEST InOut.5 = Tmp.6, Tmp.6 := true, TEST InOut.2 = Tmp.6], NOT [Tmp.6 := "", TEST InOut.5 = Tmp.6, Tmp.6 := true, TEST InOut.2 != Tmp.6]] KEEPING 6
           81298   ~1%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, _, In.0, In.3
                          {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
           64110   ~1%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

        36102333   ~0%    {5} r4 = SCAN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.1, In.3, In.4
        17473531   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `FunctionType::FunctionPosition.isSelf/0#dispred#9e84d302` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
           47409   ~1%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev_delta` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, _, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, _
                          {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := ";", Tmp.5 := (In.6 ++ Tmp.5), Tmp.8 := "", Out.5 := InverseAppend(Tmp.5,Tmp.8,In.7) KEEPING 6
           29885   ~0%    {7}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
                          {6}    | REWRITE WITH NOT [NOT [Tmp.6 := "borrow", TEST InOut.5 = Tmp.6, Tmp.6 := true, TEST InOut.2 = Tmp.6], NOT [Tmp.6 := "", TEST InOut.5 = Tmp.6, Tmp.6 := true, TEST InOut.2 != Tmp.6]] KEEPING 6
           16952   ~1%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, _, In.0, In.3
                          {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
           16829   ~0%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

          182949   ~1%    {3} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
          182949   ~1%    {3}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#e8abf748#prev`(FIRST 3)
                          return r5
```

After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#e8abf748@31ee547w was evaluated in 801 iterations totaling 19ms (delta sizes total: 182946).
         81298   ~0%    {5} r1 = JOIN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev_delta WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Rhs.4, _, Lhs.3, Rhs.3
                        {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
         64110   ~1%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

         39574   ~0%    {5} r2 = JOIN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev_delta WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.3, Rhs.2
                        {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
         36996   ~0%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

         16952   ~0%    {5} r3 = JOIN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredSelfType/3#dispred#45b2f893#prev_delta` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Rhs.4, _, Lhs.3, Rhs.3
                        {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
         16829   ~0%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

         90175   ~0%    {5} r4 = JOIN TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#7a01048b#prev WITH `TypeInference::MethodCallMatchingInput::Access.getInferredNonSelfType/2#dispred#b181cb0a#prev_delta` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Rhs.3, _, Lhs.3, Rhs.2
                        {3}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.2 := "", Out.2 := InverseAppend(In.3,Tmp.2,In.4) KEEPING 3
         65014   ~0%    {3}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1

        182949   ~1%    {3} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
        182949   ~1%    {3}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::MethodCallMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#e8abf748#prev`(FIRST 3)
                        return r5
```
 2025-10-28 13:09:32 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
409f7fb743 Address review comments 2025-10-28 11:48:45 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
0e885e9297 Rust: Compute incompatible blanket implementations 2025-10-24 11:37:24 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
41602d3efa Address review comments 2025-10-21 18:44:42 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
4b70d20cd6 Rust: Rework call resolution and type inference for calls 2025-10-21 17:58:52 +02:00
github-actions[bot]
6dd07790ac Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.23.3 2025-10-14 11:16:33 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
33542f7d40 Release preparation for version 2.23.3 2025-10-14 09:30:24 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
a7a4e43991 Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.23.2 2025-09-29 15:10:19 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
d2130a589b Release preparation for version 2.23.2 2025-09-29 10:28:45 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
4e8343664f Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.23.1 2025-09-17 10:13:40 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
02a1b1efcb Release preparation for version 2.23.1 2025-09-16 14:14:42 +00:00
Simon Friis Vindum
29ba013580 Rust: Add support for resolving methods from blanket implementations 2025-09-12 15:34:04 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
e3e1bcd63f Rename Environment -> AccessEnvironment 2025-09-09 15:06:56 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
2e90499df4 Rename State -> Environment 2025-09-09 15:05:58 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
a1980ee23c Shared: Make some generalizations in type inference library 2025-09-09 15:05:56 +02:00
github-actions[bot]
e8a2600a0c Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.23.0 2025-09-02 11:46:23 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
0bfa93828b Release preparation for version 2.23.0 2025-09-02 11:09:32 +00:00
Chris Smowton
1829060fab Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into smowton/admin/merge-rc319-into-main 2025-08-21 16:33:37 +01:00
github-actions[bot]
42e3d31c49 Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.22.4 2025-08-18 14:42:42 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
90d29994c8 Release preparation for version 2.22.4 2025-08-18 14:06:09 +00:00
Tom Hvitved
b104535b32 Type inference: Rename some variables 2025-08-15 13:46:30 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
1be542ec56 Rust: Generalize certain type inference logic 2025-08-07 10:37:17 +02:00
github-actions[bot]
fb4b0aac53 Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.22.3 2025-08-04 17:18:08 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
fd82aeb1f8 Release preparation for version 2.22.3 2025-08-04 15:47:57 +00:00
Simon Friis Vindum
43b2977cb4 Shared, Rust: Reuse hasTypeConstraint in potentialInstantiationOf and factor out multipleConstraintImplementations 2025-07-18 15:33:17 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
bdcecdfc2c Shared, Rust: Ensure that the constraints in satisfiesConstraintType are in relevantConstraint 2025-07-18 15:33:16 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
475d872ffb Shared, Rust: Adjust type inference predicates to better match use sites 2025-07-18 15:32:42 +02:00
github-actions[bot]
24a0ac1223 Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.22.2 2025-07-07 18:15:04 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
f12daefabe Release preparation for version 2.22.2 2025-07-07 14:00:26 +00:00
Tom Hvitved
e88d7baa7d Rust: Apply inherent method prioritization inside type inference loop 2025-07-01 10:17:26 +02:00
Kasper Svendsen
9d2dd782d9 Merge remote-tracking branch 'github/main' into kaspersv/overlay-java-annotations 2025-06-26 13:18:25 +02:00
github-actions[bot]
6972c7a872 Post-release preparation for codeql-cli-2.22.1 2025-06-24 12:55:14 +00:00
github-actions[bot]
3e074b2425 Release preparation for version 2.22.1 2025-06-24 08:55:31 +00:00
Kasper Svendsen
81b677a2d9 rename overlay[caller] to overlay[caller?] 2025-06-24 10:25:07 +02:00
Kasper Svendsen
c207cfdeb7 Overlay: Add overlay annotations to Java & shared libraries 2025-06-24 10:25:06 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
60c27f8c30 Rust: Address PR feedback 2025-06-23 13:11:15 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
a367388326 Shared: Refactor type inference and expose SatisfiesConstraint module 2025-06-23 12:50:45 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
70c3ae4609 Merge pull request #19727 from hvitved/shared/type-inference-doc 
Shared: Add elaborate QL doc to `TypeInference.qll`
 2025-06-12 16:31:50 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
1ec376073b Update shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll 
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey White <40627776+geoffw0@users.noreply.github.com>
 2025-06-12 12:14:52 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
18392a07ce Rust: Also apply adjustedAccessType in RelevantAccess 2025-06-11 15:00:35 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
eeaccc5a9a Update shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll 
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
 2025-06-11 12:48:06 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
b90e8679a9 Shared: Add elaborate QL doc to TypeInference.qll 2025-06-11 12:38:04 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
3c9cbf186e Rust: Fix bad join in typeParametersEqualFromIndex 
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@9c099swn was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 154ms (delta sizes total: 0).
        16307861   ~1%    {5} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.1

           37736   ~1%    {7} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
                          {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
               0   ~0%    {7}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.1, _, In.5
               0   ~0%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (InOut.6 - Tmp.5)
               0   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 6 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6

               0   ~0%    {8} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, _, Lhs.5, _
                          {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
               0   ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
               0   ~0%    {7}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
               0   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6

        12808446   ~1%    {5} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2

           22081   ~1%    {7} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
                          {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
               0   ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5
               0   ~0%    {8}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.5, _
                          {8}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6
               0   ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5

           22081   ~1%    {8} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
                          {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
           22081   ~0%    {7}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.5, _, In.3, In.0, In.1, In.4
           22081   ~0%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
           22081   ~0%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
               0   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, _
               0   ~0%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0

           37736   ~1%    {8} r7 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
                          {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
           37736   ~0%    {7}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, _, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
           37736   ~0%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
           37736   ~1%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
               0   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, _
               0   ~0%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0

               0   ~0%    {6} r8 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7
               0   ~0%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
                          return r8
```

After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@81728ywe was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 2ms (delta sizes total: 0).
            0   ~0%    {6} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, _
            0   ~0%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0

            0   ~0%    {6} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.2, _
            0   ~0%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0

        66609   ~1%    {3} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1
            0   ~0%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#reorder_0_4_1_2_3_5#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, _, Rhs.5, _
                       {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (Tmp.6 + In.7), Tmp.8 := 0, TEST Out.6 != Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
            0   ~0%    {7}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
            0   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.5, Lhs.2

            0   ~0%    {8} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, In.5, _
                       {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
            0   ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
            0   ~0%    {7}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
            0   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6

            0   ~0%    {6} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
            0   ~0%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
                       return r5
```
 2025-06-11 10:23:57 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
79e1af04df Rust: Fix bad join in satisfiesConstraintTypeMention 
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@e8671rw7 was evaluated in 378 iterations totaling 313ms (delta sizes total: 168323).
          462477    ~1%    {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
          993561    ~2%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
          993561   ~38%    {7}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
                           {7}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
          772102  ~427%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.4, In.5, In.2, In.6, In.1

           56885    ~1%    {4} r2 = SCAN TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#prev_delta OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2

               0    ~0%    {7} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.3
               0    ~0%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
               0    ~0%    {7}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
                           {7}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
               0    ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1

          462477    ~1%    {8} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
          993561   ~39%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
           23413    ~1%    {8}    | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
            2817    ~7%    {7}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
           11550    ~0%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
            2397    ~1%    {11}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
            2397    ~1%    {9}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
            2397    ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.0, In.5, In.4

           66727    ~0%    {6} r5 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
        19305359    ~0%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4
         3454881    ~1%    {10}    | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.6, Lhs.8, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7
          753104    ~1%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a_01243#join_rhs` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.9, Rhs.4
           32040   ~18%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.2
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
           13192   ~54%    {11}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
           13192   ~54%    {9}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
           13192   ~55%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0

               0    ~0%    {8} r6 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Rhs.3
               0    ~0%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
               0    ~0%    {8}    | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
               0    ~0%    {7}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
               0    ~0%    {9}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
               0    ~0%    {11}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
               0    ~0%    {9}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
                           {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
               0    ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4

          787691  ~403%    {6} r7 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6
          212766   ~54%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
                           return r7
```

After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@9c099xwn was evaluated in 380 iterations totaling 11ms (delta sizes total: 153004).
        768937    ~1%    {7} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention0/9#c82a4f76#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.5, In.8, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.7
                         {7}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
        745524  ~423%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1

         26916    ~0%    {9} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, _, Rhs.6, Lhs.1
                         {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
          8530    ~1%    {11}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
                         {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
          8530    ~1%    {9}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
                         {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
          8530    ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0

         11763    ~1%    {9} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
                         {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
          2461    ~1%    {11}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
                         {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
          2461    ~1%    {9}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
                         {7}    | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
          2461    ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4

        756515  ~396%    {6} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
        155599    ~6%    {6}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
                         return r4
```
 2025-06-11 10:04:15 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
f9915e66a7 Rust: Fix bad join in satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex 
Before

```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@061312x0 was evaluated in 367 iterations totaling 3484ms (delta sizes total: 563408).
            66609   ~0%    {3} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.0
        867138261   ~1%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_210#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1
            29320   ~0%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1
                           {5}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
            29320   ~1%    {4}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.3, In.2, In.0

            29320   ~0%    {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
                           {4}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.4 KEEPING 4
            29320   ~0%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, _, In.3
            29320   ~0%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3)
            29296   ~1%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4

            29320   ~0%    {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
                           {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
                0   ~0%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, _, In.1, In.0, In.3
                0   ~0%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0
                0   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _
                0   ~0%    {4}    | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0

           563353   ~1%    {4} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3
           563353   ~1%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, _, Lhs.3, _
                           {4}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4
           563353   ~0%    {4}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.0, In.1

           258647   ~1%    {5} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
           102998   ~1%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3
            52485   ~1%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5

           258647   ~0%    {5} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.1
           259340   ~1%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4
            16033   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.1
                           {6}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
            15992   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.1, In.5, In.2, In.0, In.4

            68477   ~1%    {6} r7 = r5 UNION r6
            68477   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.5

           465635   ~0%    {3} r8 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.2

           465635   ~0%    {5} r9 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
           465635   ~1%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0

           465635   ~1%    {5} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
           465635   ~1%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0

           275069   ~0%    {5} r11 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Rhs.1, Rhs.2
                0   ~0%    {7}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.3, _
                0   ~0%    {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.1 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5

                0   ~0%    {5} r12 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.4, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3

           465635   ~1%    {5} r13 = r10 UNION r12
            94444   ~1%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0
                6  ~20%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5

           465635   ~0%    {5} r14 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, _, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
           465635   ~1%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0

                0   ~0%    {5} r15 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3, In.4

           465635   ~1%    {5} r16 = r14 UNION r15
           465635   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
           465635   ~0%    {6}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0
                           {6}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
           465629   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.4, In.3, In.5, In.0

           465635   ~1%    {6} r17 = r13 UNION r16
           465635   ~1%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.3

           563408   ~1%    {4} r18 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r7 UNION r17
           563408   ~1%    {4}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4)
                           return r18
```

After

```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@e8671bx7 was evaluated in 376 iterations totaling 245ms (delta sizes total: 563353).
        563353   ~1%    {6} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3, _
        563353   ~1%    {4}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4

        259340   ~1%    {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
         52485   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4

        259340   ~1%    {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
         16033   ~0%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
                        {5}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
         15992   ~0%    {4}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4

        741397   ~1%    {7} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
        465635   ~1%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 = Tmp.6 KEEPING 6

        465635   ~1%    {5} r5 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.1, In.5, In.0, In.2, _
        465635   ~0%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0

        741397   ~1%    {7} r6 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
        275762   ~1%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6

             0   ~0%    {7} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _
                        {7}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5
             0   ~0%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3

        465635   ~0%    {5} r8 = r5 UNION r7
             6   ~0%    {4}    | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4

         29310   ~0%    {5} r9 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#reorder_0_4_5_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5

         29310   ~0%    {6} r10 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
                        {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
             0   ~0%    {5}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.0, In.3, _
             0   ~0%    {5}    | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0

         29310   ~0%    {6} r11 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
                        {5}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
         29310   ~1%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, _, In.1, In.4
         29310   ~1%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.3)
         29241   ~0%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.5

         29241   ~0%    {5} r12 = r10 UNION r11
                        {5}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
         29241   ~1%    {4}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4

        465635   ~0%    {6} r13 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, _
        465635   ~1%    {6}    | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0

             0   ~0%    {8} r14 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _
                        {8}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6
             0   ~0%    {6}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, In.3

        465635   ~1%    {6} r15 = r13 UNION r14
        465635   ~0%    {5}    | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
                        {5}    | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
        465629   ~1%    {4}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4

        563353   ~1%    {4} r16 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r8 UNION r12 UNION r15
        563353   ~1%    {4}    | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4)
                        return r16
```
 2025-06-11 09:15:17 +02:00