There are a few IR APIs that we've found to be confusingly named. This PR renames them to be more consistent within the IR and with the AST API:
`Instruction.getFunction` -> `Instruction.getEnclosingFunction`: This was especially confusing when you'd call `FunctionAddressInstruction.getFunction` to get the function whose address was taken, and wound up with the enclosing function instead.
`Instruction.getXXXOperand` -> `Instruction.getXXX`. Now that `Operand` is an exposed type, we want a way to get a specific `Operand` of an `Instruction`, but more often we want to get the definition instruction of that operand. Now, the pattern is that `getXXXOperand` returns the `Operand`, and `getXXX` is equivalent to `getXXXOperand().getDefinitionInstruction()`.
`Operand.getInstruction` -> `Operand.getUseInstruction`: More consistent with the existing `Operand.getDefinitionInstruction` predicate.
