The new CFG previously only emitted exception edges for explicit `raise`
and `assert` statements. As a result, code that became reachable only
via the exception path of an arbitrary expression (e.g., the body of an
`except` handler following a try-body whose `call()` could raise) was
classified as dead, breaking analyses like StackTraceExposure,
FileNotAlwaysClosed, ExceptionInfo, UseOfExit, and CatchingBaseException.
This commit adds a `mayThrow` predicate over expressions that are known
sources of implicit exceptions in Python (calls, attribute access,
subscripts, arithmetic/comparison operators, imports, await/yield/yield
from) plus `from m import *` at the statement level, and routes them
through the shared CFG's `beginAbruptCompletion(_, _, ExceptionSuccessor,
always=false)` hook.
The set of exception sources is restricted to nodes that are
syntactically inside a `try`/`with` statement in the same scope.
This mirrors Java's `ControlFlowGraph::mayThrow`, which only emits
exception edges where local handling can observe them — outside such
contexts, the edges add CFG complexity (weakening BarrierGuard
precision and breaking SSA continuity around augmented assignments and
subscript stores) without analysis benefit, since exceptions just
propagate to the function exit anyway.
Net effect on the test suite: ~100 alerts restored across the exception-
related query tests (StackTraceExposure +29, ExceptionInfo +17,
FileNotAlwaysClosed +52, UseOfExit +1, CatchingBaseException restored)
with no precision regressions. Affected `.expected` files and the
regression-guard `dead_under_no_raise.py` are updated accordingly.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Flips the Python dataflow trunk from the legacy CFG (semmle/python/Flow.qll)
and legacy ESSA SSA (semmle/python/essa/*) to the new shared CFG facade
(semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg) and the new SSA adapter
(semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.SsaImpl), both introduced
additively in the preceding PRs in this stack.
This is the trunk-flip equivalent of the original draft PR #21894 (kept
around as documentation), rebased on top of the four preparatory PRs:
P1: Remove AstNode.getAFlowNode() and rewrite callers (#21919).
P2: Qualify Flow.qll's AST references with Py:: prefix (#21920).
P3: Add new shared-CFG-backed control flow graph (#21921).
P4: Add new shared-SSA-backed SSA adapter (#21923).
The Python dataflow library (semmle/python/dataflow/new/) now imports
the new CFG facade and SSA adapter. All CFG-typed predicates
(ControlFlowNode, CallNode, BasicBlock, NameNode, AttrNode, ...) are
qualified with the Cfg:: prefix; SSA references switch from
EssaVariable/EssaDefinition to SsaImpl::Definition/SourceVariable.
GuardNode is redesigned to use the new CFG's outcome-node model
(isAfterTrue / isAfterFalse) instead of the legacy ConditionBlock +
flipped indirection. Only BarrierGuard<...> is preserved as public
API.
Framework files (Bottle, FastApi, Django, Tornado, Pyramid, Stdlib,
...) are updated to take CFG nodes from the new facade.
A handful of dataflow consistency tweaks for the new CFG:
- Augmented-assignment targets are treated as both load and store.
- 'from X import *' produces uncertain SSA writes for unknown names.
- CFG nodes are canonicalised so dataflow does not see equivalent
pre/post-order pairs as distinct nodes.
Two AST tweaks for the new CFG:
- AstNodeImpl: omit PEP 695 type-parameter names from
FunctionDefExpr / ClassDefExpr children.
- ImportResolution: drop the legacy essa import.
Test churn (~175 files): reblessed library- and query-test .expected
files reflect slightly different CFG granularity, different toString
output, and a handful of true alert deltas in security queries.
Verification: all 367 lib + src + consistency-queries compile clean.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Preparatory refactor for the shared-CFG dataflow migration. Adds the
new Python SSA adapter additively, without changing any production
behaviour.
Library additions:
- semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.SsaImpl — Python SSA
implementation built on the new (shared) CFG. Mirrors the Java SSA
adapter (java/ql/lib/semmle/code/java/dataflow/internal/SsaImpl.qll):
an InputSig is defined in terms of positional (BasicBlock, int)
variable references, and the shared
codeql.ssa.Ssa::Make<Location, Cfg, Input> module is then
instantiated.
SourceVariable is the AST-level Py::Variable. Variable references
are looked up via the new CFG facade's NameNode.defines/uses/deletes
predicates (added in the preceding PR), which themselves are
one-line bridges to AST-level Name.defines/uses/deletes.
Implicit-entry definitions are inserted for non-local/global/builtin
reads, captured variables, and (when needed) parameters.
Test additions:
- library-tests/dataflow-new-ssa/ — exercises the new SSA over a
representative test corpus and checks expected def/use chains.
- library-tests/dataflow-new-ssa-vs-legacy/ — runs both new SSA and
legacy ESSA over the same corpus and diffs the results, so any
semantic divergence shows up as a test failure.
Production impact:
None. The new SSA adapter has zero callers in lib/ and src/ — the
legacy ESSA SSA (semmle/python/essa/*) remains the default. The
dataflow library is not migrated yet; that lands in a follow-up PR.
Verified by:
- All 367 lib + src + consistency-queries compile clean.
- All 641 ControlFlow + PointsTo + dataflow + essa + consistency
library-tests pass.
- Both new dataflow-new-ssa[/vs-legacy] test packs pass.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Preparatory refactor for the shared-CFG dataflow migration. Adds the
new Python CFG library additively, without changing any production
behaviour.
Library additions:
- semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl — mediates between
the Python AST and the shared codeql.controlflow.ControlFlowGraph
signature. Wraps Python's Stmt/Expr/Scope/Pattern and adds two
synthetic kinds of node (BlockStmt for body slots, intermediate
nodes for multi-operand boolean expressions).
- semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg — public facade
re-exposing the same API surface as semmle/python/Flow.qll
(ControlFlowNode, CallNode, BasicBlock, NameNode, DefinitionNode,
CompareNode, ...), backed by the shared CFG.
- lib/printCfgNew.ql — debug/visualisation query for the new CFG.
- consistency-queries/CfgConsistency.ql — consistency query running
the shared CFG's standard checks against Python.
Shared library:
- shared.controlflow.ControlFlowGraph — adds two defaulted
getWhileElse / getForeachElse predicates to AstSig so Python can
model while-else / for-else (no behavioural change for other
languages).
Test additions:
- ControlFlow/bindings/* — annotation-driven SSA-binding tests for
the new CFG (annassign, compound, comprehension, decorated,
except_handler, imports, match_pattern, parameters, simple,
type_params, walrus_starred, with_stmt, dead_under_no_raise).
- ControlFlow/store-load/* — basic store/load coverage.
- ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfg*.ql — mirrors of the existing
OldCfg evaluation-order self-validation suite, run against the
new CFG via NewCfgImpl.qll.
- Minor extensions to existing test_if.py / test_boolean.py +
cosmetic .expected churn on a handful of OldCfg tests.
No dataflow, SSA, or production query is migrated yet — that lands in
follow-up PRs. The new CFG library has zero callers in lib/ and src/.
Verified by:
- All lib + src + consistency-queries compile clean (367 queries).
- All 56 ControlFlow library-tests pass.
- All 474 dataflow + PointsTo library-tests + consistency tests pass.
- syntax_error/CONSISTENCY/CfgConsistency passes.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Preparatory refactor for the shared-CFG dataflow migration.
Deprecates the AstNode.getAFlowNode() cached predicate on the public
Python QL API and rewrites all ~140 internal callers across lib/, src/,
test/, and tools/ from `expr.getAFlowNode() = cfgNode` to
`cfgNode.getNode() = expr`, using ControlFlowNode.getNode() which
already exists in Flow.qll.
The predicate itself is preserved (with a deprecation note pointing at
the new pattern) so external users do not experience churn — they can
migrate at their own pace and the AST/CFG hierarchies still get the
intended untangling once the deprecation eventually elapses.
Semantic noop verified by:
- All 361 lib/ + src/ queries compile clean.
- All 122 ControlFlow + PointsTo library-tests pass.
- All 64 dataflow library-tests pass.
- All 113 Variables/Exceptions/Expressions/Statements/Functions/Imports/
Security/CWE-798/ModificationOfParameterWithDefault query-tests pass.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
We now find an alert on this line as we hope to
It is not an alert for _full_ SSRF, though, since that configuration cannot handle multiple substitutions.
- remove `tupleStoreStep` and `dictStoreStep` from `containerStep`
These are imprecise compared to the content being precise.
- add implicit reads to recover taint at sinks
- add implicit read steps for decoders
to supplement the `AdditionalTaintStep`
that now only covers when the full container is tainted.
This one is potentially a bit iffy -- it checks for a very powerful
property (that implies many of the other queries), but as the test
results show, it can produce false positives when there is in fact no
problem. We may want to get rid of it entirely, if it becomes too noisy.
This looks for nodes annotated with `t[never]` in the test that are
reachable in the CFG. This should not happen (it messes with various
queries, e.g. the "mixed returns" query), but the test shows that in a
few particular cases (involving the `match` statement where all cases
contain `return`s), we _do_ have reachable nodes that shouldn't be.
This one demonstrates a bug in the current CFG. In a dictionary
comprehension `{k: v for k, v in d.items()}`, we evaluate the value
before the key, which is incorrect. (A fix for this bug has been
implemented in a separate PR.)
These use the annotated, self-verifying test files to check various
consistency requirements.
Some of these may be expressing the same thing in different ways, but
it's fairly cheap to keep them around, so I have not attempted to
produce a minimal set of queries for this.
These tests consist of various Python constructions (hopefully a
somewhat comprehensive set) with specific timestamp annotations
scattered throughout. When the tests are run using the Python 3
interpreter, these annotations are checked and compared to the "current
timestamp" to see that they are in agreement. This is what makes the
tests "self-validating".
There are a few different kinds of annotations: the basic `t[4]` style
(meaning this is executed at timestamp 4), the `t[dead(4)]` variant
(meaning this _would_ happen at timestamp 4, but it is in a dead
branch), and `t[never]` (meaning this is never executed at all).
In addition to this, there is a query, MissingAnnotations, which checks
whether we have applied these annotations maximally. Many expression
nodes are not actually annotatable, so there is a sizeable list of
excluded nodes for that query.
We won't be able to run these tests until Python 3.15 is actually out
(and our CI is using it), so it seemed easiest to just put them in their
own test directory.
