Commit Graph

210 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Hvitved
f4b82cb2e8 Python: Update expected test output 2022-09-22 15:01:40 +02:00
yoff
ea743173d5 Merge pull request #8781 from yoff/python-dataflow/flow-summaries-from-scratch
Python dataflow: flow summaries restart
2022-09-20 14:08:31 +02:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
245baa51a3 Python: rename summary map -> list_map,
since map resolves to a class call

also fix test expectation
2022-09-14 11:21:16 +02:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
efc5cfb852 Merge branch 'main' of github.com:github/codeql into python-dataflow/flow-summaries-from-scratch 2022-09-12 19:56:16 +02:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
0f95992b2f Python: remove NonLibraryDataFlowCallable
this required managing parameters and their pre-update nodes a bit
2022-09-12 15:17:29 +02:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
4296ac1ac0 Python: Allow CallNode.getArgByName for keyword args after **kwargs 2022-09-12 15:03:13 +02:00
erik-krogh
1d1aa7c8b4 update some expected output 2022-08-25 20:52:30 +02:00
yoff
8bf60301da python: we have hidden isParameterOf
but now allow a clear alternative
2022-06-23 08:57:50 +00:00
yoff
fe0c5d8ee5 python: make ArgumentNode publicly usable
- add `getCall`
2022-06-23 08:48:55 +00:00
yoff
cedf9ef538 python: make DataFlowCall "publicly usable"
- add `getCallable`, `getArg` and `getNode`
- these are `none` for summary calls
- revert "external" uses (they had been changed to `DataFlowSourceCall`)
2022-06-23 08:32:23 +00:00
yoff
dd69100dcd python: ParameterNode -> SourceParameterNode 2022-06-21 12:55:22 +00:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
506efcf051 python: refactor TDataFlowCall
- Branch predicates are made simple. In particular, they do not try to detect library calls.
- All branches based on `CallNode`s are gathered into one.
- That branch has been given a class `NonSpecialCall`, which is the new parent of call classes based on `CallNode`s. (Those classes now have more involved charpreds.)
- A new such class, 'LambdaCall` has been split out from `FunctionCall` to allow the latter to replace its
  general `CallNode` field with a specific `FunctionValue` one.
- `NonSpecialCall` is not an abstract class, but it has some abstract overrides. Therefor, it is not
  considered a resolved call in the test `UnresolvedCalls.qll`.
2022-05-10 12:48:42 +00:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
828db3a392 python: Add summary nodes
allowing more `OutNode`s (not restricting to `CallNode`s),
gives more flow in the `classesCallGraph` test
2022-05-10 12:48:42 +00:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
80175a9af5 Python: Compiles and mostly pass tests
- add flowsummaries shared files
- register in indentical files
- fix initial non-monotonic recursions
  - add DataFlowSourceCall
  - add resolvedCall
  - add SourceParameterNode

failing tests:
- 3/library-tests/with/test.ql
2022-05-10 12:48:42 +00:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
01d426dc58 Python: Replace rest of from testlib import *
I think we should write our tests in a way that puts points-to in the
best condition to resolve calls. Although this specific change did not
change much, it should help set us up for success in the future 👍
2022-02-28 10:58:44 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
d2cd77aefb Merge branch 'main' into dataflow-improvements 2022-02-21 14:49:40 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
67ca14876a Python: Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: yoff <lerchedahl@gmail.com>
2022-02-18 13:47:07 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
a8edd44a3c Python: Update .expected 2022-02-08 11:12:34 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
cc4fe38fbd Python: Delete dedicated argumentRouting<N> tests
I feel like they don't bring any value anymore, since we have the nice
inline expectation tests. If I'm wrong, happy to revert this commit
though.
2022-02-01 17:51:33 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
54f53c828e Python: Refactor argumentRoutingTest.ql to be more generic
I checked to see that the tests still works. If I deleted the `arg5`
annotation, it got failures:

```diff
diff --git a/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentPassing.py b/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentPassing.py
index e218bdde9b..71816c1e01 100644
--- a/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentPassing.py
+++ b/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentPassing.py
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ def argument_passing(
     c,
     d=arg4,  #$ arg4 func=argument_passing
     *,
-    e=arg5,  #$ arg5 func=argument_passing
+    e=arg5,
     f,
     **g,
 ):
diff --git a/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentRoutingTest.expected b/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentRoutingTest.expected
index e69de29bb2..22037a40c3 100644
--- a/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentRoutingTest.expected
+++ b/python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/coverage/argumentRoutingTest.expected
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+| argumentPassing.py:49:7:49:10 | ControlFlowNode for arg5 | Unexpected result: arg5= |
+| argumentPassing.py:49:7:49:10 | ControlFlowNode for arg5 | Unexpected result: func=argument_passing |
```
2022-02-01 17:50:06 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
76f3d74fed Python: Remove extra whitespace from argumentPassing.py 2022-02-01 17:48:16 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
5ee755db09 Python: Require MISSING: flow annotations for normal data-flow tests
I had to rewrite the SINK1-SINK7 definitions, since this new requirement
complained that we had to add this `MISSING: flow` annotation :D

Doing this implementation also revealed that there was a bug, since I
did not compare files when checking for these `MISSING:` annotations. So
fixed that up in the implementation for inline taint tests as well.

(extra whitespace in argumentPassing.py to avoid changing line numbers
for other tests)
2022-02-01 17:46:53 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
2bc4a60496 Python: Unify normal dataflow test setup
I went with NormalDataflowTest to signify that if you don't know what
you're looking for, this is probably the one. I did not want to just
call it DataflowTest, since that becomes a big vague when there are also
`FlowTest.qll` and `MaximalFlowTest.qll` -- I'm open to renaming this
though 👍
2022-02-01 17:31:31 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
8444388ec7 Python: Update .expected 2021-10-11 09:48:56 +02:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
a50b193c40 Python: Model data-flow for x or y and x and y 2021-10-08 18:32:30 +02:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
15476c2513 Python: Add data-flow tests for BoolExp
> 6.11. Boolean operations

> The expression x and y first evaluates x; if x is false, its value is
> returned; otherwise, y is evaluated and the resulting value is
> returned.

> The expression x or y first evaluates x; if x is true, its value is
> returned; otherwise, y is evaluated and the resulting value is
> returned.
2021-10-08 18:29:06 +02:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
baca9edbb1 Merge branch 'main' of github.com:github/codeql into python-add-parameter-default-value-flow-step 2021-09-08 14:48:13 +02:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
4a5f70e6c8 Python: Reclassify defaultValueFlowStep
as a `jumpStep`.
2021-09-08 10:05:31 +02:00
Anders Schack-Mulligen
f30dad7705 Dataflow: Update test expected outputs. 2021-09-07 13:02:20 +02:00
Taus
53711dc82f Merge pull request #5238 from RasmusWL/no-flow-default-value
Python: Highlight missing flow from default value in functions
2021-02-23 13:27:41 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
5249b54a9b Python: Highlight missing flow from default value in functions
Although it is becoming non-trivial to get an overview of what tests we have and
don't have, I didn't find any that highlighted this one

I used all 3 variants of parameters, just to be sure :)
2021-02-22 14:52:51 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
d23a8ad016 Python: elide test output 2021-02-21 13:12:54 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
46faba69ff Python: Fix for-iteration of tuples 2021-02-21 12:41:16 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
0aecf33fe6 Python: test iteration through overflow parameters
These are in a tuple, so the for-step does not fire
2021-02-21 12:33:04 +01:00
Taus
634041d2d7 Merge pull request #5047 from yoff/python-dataflow-unpacking-unifying-experiments
Python: dataflow, unify iterated unpacking
2021-02-04 12:57:43 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
a7ca065411 Python: Fix ForTarget 2021-02-03 22:14:15 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
27fd46b855 Python: Update test expectation 2021-02-01 08:55:20 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
f6fa1276a6 Python: Add consistency checks
to all data-flow test floders
2021-01-29 21:28:43 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
05a138694d Python: Fix crashing test 2021-01-29 21:12:44 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
182d435dc6 Python: Replace comprehension read-step by for
read-step. Add a version targetting sequence nodes.
2021-01-29 17:31:59 +01:00
Taus
cb195a0dc4 Merge pull request #4752 from yoff/python-dataflow-unpacking-assignment
Python: Dataflow, unpacking assignment
2021-01-29 14:15:28 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen
902bade5ae Merge pull request #5015 from yoff/python-add-missing-postupdate-nodes
Python: add missing postupdate nodes
2021-01-26 14:39:29 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
7b9ca7171a Python: update test expectations 2021-01-26 09:47:48 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
dacc21d0b5 Python: update test expectation 2021-01-26 09:45:41 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
ad39bfb2ff Python: Add postupdate nodes for subscripts.
This drops reverse read inconsistencies on saltstack from 14909 to 1353.
2021-01-25 17:01:25 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
361bee851a Python: Tests inspired by reverse read check 2021-01-25 17:01:25 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
4ff2c6d85a Python: fix test expectation
probably a copy-paste error..
2021-01-25 16:49:51 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
0d20a4cb4a Python: Simplify modelling 2021-01-22 19:40:34 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
f948ef8f27 Merge branch 'main' of github.com:github/codeql into python-dataflow-unpacking-assignment 2021-01-22 16:26:48 +01:00
Rasmus Lerchedahl Petersen
e786be06ae Python: Fix broken references 2021-01-21 12:40:35 +01:00