Flips the Python dataflow trunk from the legacy CFG (semmle/python/Flow.qll)
and legacy ESSA SSA (semmle/python/essa/*) to the new shared CFG facade
(semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg) and the new SSA adapter
(semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.SsaImpl), both introduced
additively in the preceding PRs in this stack.
This is the trunk-flip equivalent of the original draft PR #21894 (kept
around as documentation), rebased on top of the four preparatory PRs:
P1: Remove AstNode.getAFlowNode() and rewrite callers (#21919).
P2: Qualify Flow.qll's AST references with Py:: prefix (#21920).
P3: Add new shared-CFG-backed control flow graph (#21921).
P4: Add new shared-SSA-backed SSA adapter (#21923).
The Python dataflow library (semmle/python/dataflow/new/) now imports
the new CFG facade and SSA adapter. All CFG-typed predicates
(ControlFlowNode, CallNode, BasicBlock, NameNode, AttrNode, ...) are
qualified with the Cfg:: prefix; SSA references switch from
EssaVariable/EssaDefinition to SsaImpl::Definition/SourceVariable.
GuardNode is redesigned to use the new CFG's outcome-node model
(isAfterTrue / isAfterFalse) instead of the legacy ConditionBlock +
flipped indirection. Only BarrierGuard<...> is preserved as public
API.
Framework files (Bottle, FastApi, Django, Tornado, Pyramid, Stdlib,
...) are updated to take CFG nodes from the new facade.
A handful of dataflow consistency tweaks for the new CFG:
- Augmented-assignment targets are treated as both load and store.
- 'from X import *' produces uncertain SSA writes for unknown names.
- CFG nodes are canonicalised so dataflow does not see equivalent
pre/post-order pairs as distinct nodes.
Two AST tweaks for the new CFG:
- AstNodeImpl: omit PEP 695 type-parameter names from
FunctionDefExpr / ClassDefExpr children.
- ImportResolution: drop the legacy essa import.
Test churn (~175 files): reblessed library- and query-test .expected
files reflect slightly different CFG granularity, different toString
output, and a handful of true alert deltas in security queries.
Verification: all 367 lib + src + consistency-queries compile clean.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Preparatory refactor for the shared-CFG dataflow migration.
Deprecates the AstNode.getAFlowNode() cached predicate on the public
Python QL API and rewrites all ~140 internal callers across lib/, src/,
test/, and tools/ from `expr.getAFlowNode() = cfgNode` to
`cfgNode.getNode() = expr`, using ControlFlowNode.getNode() which
already exists in Flow.qll.
The predicate itself is preserved (with a deprecation note pointing at
the new pattern) so external users do not experience churn — they can
migrate at their own pace and the AST/CFG hierarchies still get the
intended untangling once the deprecation eventually elapses.
Semantic noop verified by:
- All 361 lib/ + src/ queries compile clean.
- All 122 ControlFlow + PointsTo library-tests pass.
- All 64 dataflow library-tests pass.
- All 113 Variables/Exceptions/Expressions/Statements/Functions/Imports/
Security/CWE-798/ModificationOfParameterWithDefault query-tests pass.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
We won't be able to run these tests until Python 3.15 is actually out
(and our CI is using it), so it seemed easiest to just put them in their
own test directory.
Adds `hasOverloadDecorator` as a predicate on functions. It looks for
decorators called `overload` or `something.overload` (usually
`typing.overload` or `t.overload`). These are then filtered out in the
predicates that (approximate) resolving methods according to the MRO.
As the test introduced in the previous commit shows, this removes the
spurious resolutions we had before.
With `ModuleVariableNode`s now appearing for _all_ global variables (not
just the ones that actually seem to be used), some of the tests changed
a bit. Mostly this was in the form of new flow (because of new nodes
that popped into existence). For some inline expectation tests, I opted
to instead exclude these results, as there was no suitable location to
annotate. For the normal tests, I just accepted the output (after having
vetted it carefully, of course).
This test demonstrates the current state of affairs: that `copy.replace`
essentially blocks all flow of taint through it, because it has not been
modelled yet.
This can also serve for a place to add tests for
constructs like threading.Thread, mulitprocess.Process, concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor, and concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor.
