Some of our IR consistency failure query predicates already produced results in the schema as an `@kind problem` query, including `$@` replacements for the enclosing `IRFunction` to make it easier to figure out which function to dump when debugging. This change moves the rest of the query predicates in `IRConsistency.qll` to do the same. In addition, it wraps each call to `getEnclosingIRFunction()` to return an `OptionalIRFunction`, which can be either a real `IRFunction` or a placeholder in case `getEnclosingIRFunction()` returned no results. This exposes a couple new consistency failures in `syntax-zoo`, which will be fixed in a subsequent commit.
This change also deals with consistency failures when the enclosing `IRFunction` has more than one `Function` or `Location`. For multiple `Function`s, we concatenate the function names. For multiple `Location`s, we pick the first one in lexicographical order. This changes the number of results produced in the existing tests, but does't change the actual number of problems.
The conflicts came from how `this` is now a parameter but not a
`Parameter` on `master`.
Conflicts:
cpp/ql/src/semmle/code/cpp/ir/dataflow/internal/DataFlowUtil.qll
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/defaulttainttracking.cpp
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/tainted.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/test_diff.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/dataflow-tests/dataflow-ir-consistency.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/fields/ir-flow.expected
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/syntax-zoo/dataflow-ir-consistency.expected
While investigating a bug with `TInstruction` sharing, I discovered that we had a case where alias analysis could create two `VirtualVariable`s for the same `Allocation`. For an indirect parameter allocation, we were using the type of the pointer variable as the type of the indirect allocation, instead of just `Unknown`. If the `IRType` of the pointer variable was the same type as the type of at least one access to the indirect allocation, we'd create both an `EntireAllocationVirtualVariable` and a `VariableVirtualVariable` for the allocation.
I added a new consistency test to guard against this in the future. This also turned out to be the root cause of the one existing known consistency failure in the IR tests.
