In the IR, some memory accesses are "must" accesses (the entire memory location is always read or written), and some are "may" accesses (some, all, or none of the bits in the location are written). We previously had to special case specific "may" accesses in a few places. This change regularizes our handling of "may" accesses.
The `MemoryAccessKind` enumeration now describes only the extent of the access (the set of locations potentially accessed), but does not distinguish "must" from "may". The new predicates `Operand.hasMayMemoryAccess()` and `Instruction.hasResultMayMemoryAccess()` hold when the access is a "may" access.
Unaliased SSA now correctly ignores variables that are ever accessed via a "may" access.
Aliased SSA now distinguishes `MemoryLocation`s for "may" and "must" accesses. I've refactored `getOverlap()` into the core `getExtentOverlap()`, which considers only the extent, but not the "may" vs. "must", and `getOverlap()`, which tweaks the result of `getExtentOverlap()` based on "may" vs. "must" and read-only locations.
When determining the overlap between a `Phi` operand and its definition, we now use the result of the defining `Chi` instruction, if one exists. This gives exact definitions for `Phi` operands for virtual variables.
Previously, we didn't track string literals as known memory locations at all, so they all just got marked as `UnknownMemoryLocation`, just like an aribtrary read from a random pointer. This led to some confusing def-use chains, where it would look like the contents of a string literal were being written to by the side effect of an earlier function call, which of course is impossible.
To fix this, I've made two changes. First, each string literal is now given a corresponding `IRVariable` (specifically `IRStringLiteral`), since a string literal behaves more or less as a read-only global variable. Second, the `IRVariable` for each string literal is now marked `isReadOnly()`, which the alias analysis uses to determine that an arbitrary write to aliased memory will not overwrite the contents of a string literal.
I originally planned to treat all string literals with the same value as being the same memory location, since this is the usual behavior of modern compilers. However, this made implementing `IRVariable.getAST()` tricky for string literals, so I left them unpooled.
Expressions like the `e` in `e;` or `e, e2`, whose result is immediately
discarded, should not get a synthetic `CopyValue`. This removes a lot of
redundancy from the IR.
To prevent these expressions from being confused with the expressions
from which they get their result, the predicate
`getInstructionConvertedResultExpression` now suppresses results for
expressions that don't produce their own result. This should fix the
mapping between expressions and IR data-flow nodes.
