Commit Graph

78 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Hvitved
f1193d084b C#: Add missing toString() relations 2019-12-16 19:38:46 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
abcb6b8aab C#: Type-based pruning for data flow 2019-12-10 15:48:48 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
54088248a1 C#: Use source declarations in field flow 2019-12-10 15:46:31 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
a344707baa C#: Add more data flow tests
Add tests that exhibit missing type pruning.
2019-12-10 15:46:31 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
78ddb37a8c C#: Track type information in data flow
This commit adds type information to data flow paths, by mapping node types onto
the smaller set of GVN types, and implementing `ppReprType()`.

The effect is a mere change in `DataFlow::PathNode::toString()`; no type-based
pruning is done yet.
2019-12-10 15:46:28 +01:00
Calum Grant
4b0a149704 C#: Update qltest output. 2019-12-06 12:41:20 +00:00
Tom Hvitved
af453d081e C#: Only track taint through conversion operators defined in libraries 2019-11-28 15:21:04 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
71e958eabc C#: Add taint-tracking steps through conversion operator calls 2019-11-26 13:53:50 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
acb069f69b C#: Add data flow tests for conversion operators 2019-11-26 13:53:17 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
f9bff172d4 C#: Add missing assignment data flow steps 2019-11-15 11:36:05 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
f8791c884f C#: Add more data flow tests for assignments 2019-11-15 11:30:40 +01:00
Calum Grant
051dd6b3dc C#: Update qltests. 2019-11-14 17:14:51 +00:00
Calum Grant
fe83bac0fb C#: Fix up test output
C#: Fix a qltest whereby a tuple type having multiple underlying types was causing an issue with the IR sanity checks.
C#: Revert more changes.
C#: Fix tests and remove dead code.
2019-11-12 13:40:58 +00:00
Calum Grant
df1e215d98 C#: Add ?? as a local dataflow step. 2019-10-23 21:47:03 +01:00
Calum Grant
48c0d9ecca C#: Add qltests for ?? dataflow. 2019-10-23 15:17:26 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
c57015af7d C#: Data-flow pruning based on call contexts 2019-10-16 13:51:32 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
853cbd8728 C#: Add dataflow tests exhibiting missing call-context based pruning 2019-10-16 13:39:35 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
e4d17a9b04 C#: Refactor getAnOutNode() predicate 2019-09-22 18:55:34 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
cf4db48eb1 Merge branch 'rc/1.22' into master 2019-09-18 16:53:55 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
09e4e7901a C#: Update expected test output 2019-09-18 13:36:15 +02:00
Luke Cartey
407f6349a3 C#: Fix potential bug in CaptureOutNode.
In theory this bug could associated CaptureOutNodes with the wrong transitively called
callable. However, in practice I could not create a test case that revealed incorrect
behaviour. I've included one such test case in the commit.

I believe that the cause of this is that OutNode::getACall() is not actually used in the
data flow libraries. Instead, DataFlowDispatch::Cached::getAnOutNode is the predicate
which is used to associated OutNode's with DataFlowCall's in practice, and that is always
used in a context that correctly binds the runtime target of the call.
2019-09-18 11:48:29 +01:00
Luke Cartey
4ecfe97e7b C#: Adjust line numbers in test case. 2019-09-18 10:55:59 +01:00
Luke Cartey
3c07caefe4 C#: Add test for transitive capture calls. 2019-09-17 15:21:30 +01:00
Luke Cartey
70c2cc595b C#: Add capture test for nested lambdas, commented out
Add a commented out version of the test, and modify the expected files
to contain the same results at new offsets.
2019-09-17 15:13:10 +01:00
Anders Schack-Mulligen
6299625b3d C#: Adjust qltest expected output. 2019-09-12 11:00:49 +02:00
Jonas Jensen
b1be123e31 C#/C++/Java: Prettier AccessPath.toString
The `ppReprType` predicate should now be `none()` instead of `result=""`
to signal that there is nothing to print. That seems clearer to me.
2019-09-02 13:14:20 +02:00
Jonas Jensen
dbe8034e04 C#: Accept test results 2019-09-02 13:14:17 +02:00
semmle-qlci
394563de43 Merge pull request #1807 from hvitved/csharp/dataflow/barrier-guard
Approved by calumgrant
2019-08-30 12:40:25 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
6e7ef66642 C#: Revert to using GuardedDataFlowNode in TaintedPath.qll 2019-08-30 09:37:23 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
751985dcf2 C#: Address review comments 2019-08-30 09:37:23 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
ae5fb7f330 C#: Introduce BarrierGuards 2019-08-30 09:37:16 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
c5d9d74c0a C#: Nested field flow 2019-08-23 09:25:05 +02:00
Calum Grant
ff20a2ceb9 Merge pull request #1761 from hvitved/csharp/dataflow/fields
C#: Data flow through fields
2019-08-22 20:46:00 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
5d140930d0 C#: Add field initializers to CFG for constructors
This commit adds field initializers to the CFG for non-static constructors. For
example, in

```
class C
{
    int Field1 = 0;
    int Field2 = Field1 + 1;
    int Field3;

    public C()
    {
        Field3 = 2;
    }

    public C(int i)
    {
        Field3 = 3;
    }
}
```

the initializer expressions `Field1 = 0` and `Field2 = Field1 + 1` are added
to the two constructors, mimicking

```
public C()
{
    Field1 = 0;
    Field2 = Field1 + 1;
    Field3 = 2;
}
```

and

```
public C()
{
    Field1 = 0;
    Field2 = Field1 + 1;
    Field3 = 3;
}
```

respectively. This means that we no longer have to synthesize calls, callables,
parameters, and arguments in the data flow library, so much of the work from
d1755500e4 can be simplified.
2019-08-21 16:21:38 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
d1755500e4 C#: Data flow through fields
Initial implementation of data flow through fields, using the algorithm of the
shared data flow implementation. Fields (and field-like properties) are covered,
and stores can be either
 - ordinary assignments, `Foo = x`,
 - object initializers, `new C() { Foo = x }`, or
 - field initializers, `int Foo = x`.

For field initializers, we need to synthesize calls (`SynthesizedCall`),
callables (`SynthesizedCallable`), parameters (`InstanceParameterNode`), and
arguments (`SynthesizedThisArgumentNode`), as the C# extractor does not (yet)
extract such entities. For example, in

```
class C
{
    int Field1 = 1;
    int Field2 = 2;

    C() { }
}
```

there is a synthesized call from the constructor `C`, with a synthesized `this`
argument, and the targets of that call are two synthesized callables with bodies
`this.Field1 = 1` and `this.Field2 = 2`, respectively.

A consequence of this is that `DataFlowCallable` is no longer an alias for
`DotNet::Callable`, but instead an IPA type.
2019-08-16 15:49:37 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
5ecf680cc2 C#: Improve performance of SSA adjacent reads calculation
- Speedup the `varBlockReaches()` predicate, by restricting to basic blocks
  in which a given SSA definition may still be live, in constrast to just
  being able to reach *any* access (read or write) to the underlying source
  variable.
- Account for some missing cases in the `lastRead()` predicate.
2019-08-08 16:21:57 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
4d58154ff5 C#: Fix data flow for out/ref parameters 2019-08-02 14:25:38 -07:00
Tom Hvitved
04db1bf3f4 C#: Add data flow test for methods with multiple out/ref parameters 2019-08-02 13:46:18 -07:00
semmle-qlci
f58c7cc79c Merge pull request #1446 from hvitved/csharp/cached-stages
Approved by calumgrant
2019-06-27 08:03:24 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
a1d7382a67 C#: Update expected test output 2019-06-17 20:07:54 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
946be967f8 C#: Break up a big cached stage into multiple stages
- Add `Caching.qll` for controlling caching across multiple files.
- Move `isUncertainRefCall()` out of cached module in `Assignable.qll` to avoid
  collapsing with CFG stage.
- Remove dependency on `AlwaysNullExpr` in `NullValue::getAnExpr()` to avoid
  collapsing with CFG stage.
- Avoid caching pre-SSA library as it should only be used during the CFG construction
  stage.
2019-06-12 16:05:45 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
8c1cab2d03 C#: Simplify extraction of is expressions and case statements 2019-06-03 15:50:41 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
e1d4166e3c C#: Data flow through this parameter 2019-05-20 13:42:32 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
c6a471e4b6 C#: Adopt shared data flow implementation
- General refactoring to fit with the shared data flow implementation.
- Move CFG splitting logic into `ControlFlowReachability.qll`.
- Replace `isAdditionalFlowStepIntoCall()` with `TaintedParameterNode`.
- Redefine `ReturnNode` to be the actual values that are returned, which should
  yield better path information.
- No longer consider overrides in CIL calls.
2019-05-06 14:54:11 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
26debb846c C#: Change ImplicitCapturedArgumentNode::toString() 2019-05-06 14:54:11 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
dfdfae8dd6 C#: Add more data flow tests 2019-05-03 09:41:39 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
b48576d7b9 C#: Address review comments 2019-03-10 15:45:31 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
e6f7632d4c C#: Introduce data flow return nodes
Before this change,

```
flowOutOfCallableStep(CallNode call, ReturnNode ret, OutNode out, CallContext cc)
```

would compute all combinations of call sites `call` and returned expressions `ret`
up front.

Now, we instead introduce explicit return nodes, so each callable has exactly
one return node (as well as one for each `out`/`ref` parameter). There is then
local flow from a returned expression to the relevant return node, and
`flowOutOfCallableStep()` computes combinations of call sites and return nodes.

Not only does this result in better performance, it also makes `flowOutOfCallableStep()`
symmetric to `flowIntoCallableStep()`, where each argument is mapped to a parameter,
and not to all reads of that parameter.
2019-03-07 12:16:06 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
5ce9b25ec9 C#: Improve CFG for assignments
Write accesses in assignments, such as the access to `x` in `x = 0` are not
evaluated, so they should not have entries in the control flow graph. However,
qualifiers (and indexer arguments) should still be evaluated, for example in

```
x.Foo.Bar = 0;
```

the CFG should be `x --> x.Foo --> 0 --> x.Foo.Bar = 0` (as opposed to
`x --> x.Foo --> x.Foo.Bar --> 0 --> x.Foo.Bar = 0`, prior to this change).

A special case is assignments via acessors (properties, indexers, and event
adders), where we do want to include the access in the control flow graph,
as it represents the accessor call:

```
x.Prop = 0;
```

But instead of `x --> x.set_Prop --> 0 --> x.Prop = 0` the CFG should be
`x --> 0 --> x.set_Prop --> x.Prop = 0`, as the setter is called *after* the
assigned value has been evaluated.

An even more special case is tuple assignments via accessors:

```
(x.Prop1, y.Prop2) = (0, 1);
```

Here the CFG should be
`x --> y --> 0 --> 1 --> x.set_Prop1 --> y.set_Prop2 --> (x.Prop1, y.Prop2) = (0, 1)`.
2019-02-16 19:19:24 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
8cb8c967d2 C#: Remove some impossible CFG exception edges 2019-02-11 16:17:01 +01:00