Commit Graph

24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mathias Vorreiter Pedersen
3efe60fdd2 C++: Accept test changes. 2021-10-28 12:35:01 +01:00
Mathias Vorreiter Pedersen
a082172422 C++: Add testcase demonstrating missing local flow out of fields that are defined by reference. 2021-07-29 14:46:32 +02:00
Jonas Jensen
064568c36d Revert "Merge pull request #4784 from MathiasVP/mathiasvp/reverse-read-take-3"
This reverts commit 1b3d69d617, reversing
changes made to 527c41520e.
2021-02-03 08:49:37 +01:00
Mathias Vorreiter Pedersen
72a80e3722 C++: Accept test changes. 2020-12-22 09:14:54 +01:00
Cornelius Riemenschneider
644a0fac98 C++: Port dataflow/dataflow-tests to inline expectations test library. 2020-11-27 16:03:15 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
bdce24735c C++: Add flow through arrays
This works by adding data-flow edges to skip over array expressions when
reading from arrays. On the post-update side, there was already code to
skip over array expressions when storing to arrays. That happens in
`valueToUpdate` in `AddressFlow.qll`, which needed just a small tweak to
support assignments with non-field expressions at the top-level LHS,
like `*a = ...` or `a[0] = ...`.

The new code in `AddressFlow.qll` is copy-pasted from `EscapesTree.qll`,
and there is already a note in these files saying that they share a lot
of code and must be maintained in sync.
2020-09-15 14:46:11 +02:00
Jonas Jensen
5f0d283212 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into dataflow-indirect-args
The conflicts came from how `this` is now a parameter but not a
`Parameter` on `master`.

Conflicts:
	cpp/ql/src/semmle/code/cpp/ir/dataflow/internal/DataFlowUtil.qll
	cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/defaulttainttracking.cpp
	cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/tainted.expected
	cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/DefaultTaintTracking/test_diff.expected
	cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/dataflow-tests/dataflow-ir-consistency.expected
	cpp/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/fields/ir-flow.expected
	cpp/ql/test/library-tests/syntax-zoo/dataflow-ir-consistency.expected
2020-06-02 15:35:02 +02:00
Robert Marsh
71d87be773 C++: add flow through partial loads in DTT 2020-01-29 17:51:42 -08:00
Ian Lynagh
1d56407c72 C++: Pull some of library-tests/dataflow/dataflow-tests into clang.cpp
g++ doesn't support this code:

    sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported
       twoIntFields sSwapped = { .m2 = source(), .m1 = 0 };

so we need to build it in clang mode.
2019-09-05 15:12:17 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
e9a029cba3 C++: Local field flow using global library
This commit removes fields from the responsibilities of `FlowVar.qll`.
The treatment of fields in that file was slow and imprecise.

It then adds another copy of the shared global data flow library, used
only to find local field flow, and it exposes that local field flow
through `localFlow` and `localFlowStep`.

This has a performance cost. It adds two cached stages to any query that
uses `localFlow`: the stage from `DataFlowImplCommon`, which is shared
with all queries that use global data flow, and a new stage just for
`localFlowStep`.
2019-09-02 11:17:27 +02:00
Dave Bartolomeo
8a9528b1a8 C++: Accept test output after fixes for PointerAdd element sizes 2019-08-22 10:43:31 -07:00
Jonas Jensen
1b4b352316 C++: Field flow through ClassAggregateLiteral 2019-08-15 12:01:42 +02:00
Jonas Jensen
6a3f5efc1b C++: Accept AST field flow test output 2019-08-08 14:05:03 +02:00
Dave Bartolomeo
95a62beb7a C++: Update test expectations due to better dataflow analysis 2019-05-02 11:18:09 -07:00
Jonas Jensen
fedd652de8 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/rc/1.20' into mergeback-20190408 2019-04-08 08:39:44 +02:00
Jonas Jensen
71659594c8 C++: Let data flow past definition by reference
This commit changes how data flow works in the following code.

    MyType x = source();
    defineByReference(&x);
    sink(x);

The question here is whether there should be flow from `source` to
`sink`. Such flow is desirable if `defineByReference` doesn't write to
all of `x`, but it's undesirable if `defineByReference` is a typical
init function in `C` that writes to every field or if
`defineByReference` is `memcpy` or `memset` on the full range.

Before 1.20.0, there would be flow from `source` to `sink` in case `x`
happened to be modeled with `BlockVar` but not in case `x` happened to
be modelled with SSA. The choice of modelling depends on an analysis of
how `x` is used elsewhere in the function, and it's supposed to be an
internal implementation detail that there are two ways to model
variables. In 1.20.0, I changed the `BlockVar` behavior so it worked the
same as SSA, never allowing that flow. It turns out that this change
broke a customer's query.

This commit reverts `BlockVar` to its old behavior of letting flow
propagate past the `defineByReference` call and then regains consistency
by changing all variables that are ever defined by reference to be
modelled with `BlockVar` instead of SSA. This means we now get too much
flow in certain cases, but that appears to be better overall than
getting too little flow. See also the discussion in CPP-336.
2019-04-01 14:13:47 +02:00
Jonas Jensen
0a57767cc6 C++: Data flow through StmtExpr 2019-03-05 14:36:40 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
a2de057c26 C++: Test for StmtExpr data flow 2019-03-05 14:34:19 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
8e6daafd7c C++: Add DefinitionByReferenceNode.getParameter
This commits also adds a test that uses `getParameter`. The new tests
demonstrate that support for array-to-pointer decay works, but we get
data flow to the array rather than its contents.
2019-02-28 09:39:51 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
80183464d9 C++: Define DefinitionByReferenceNode
This enables data flow through `memcpy` and similar functions modeled in
`semmle.code.cpp.model`.
2019-02-27 15:53:00 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
5647a1a658 C++: BlockVar value stops at def by ref (partial) 2019-02-27 15:05:53 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
20f3df0d09 C++: Add tests to demo lack dataflow by reference 2019-02-27 13:19:16 +01:00
Jonas Jensen
502b7cfe33 C++: Don't use C-style varargs in test.cpp sink
As we prepare to clarify how conversions are treated, we don't want a
`sink(...)` declaration where it's non-obvious which conversions are
applied to arguments.
2019-01-16 09:47:58 +01:00
Pavel Avgustinov
b55526aa58 QL code and tests for C#/C++/JavaScript. 2018-08-02 17:53:23 +01:00