Preparatory refactor for the shared-CFG dataflow migration. Adds the
new Python CFG library additively, without changing any production
behaviour.
Library additions:
- semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl — mediates between
the Python AST and the shared codeql.controlflow.ControlFlowGraph
signature. Wraps Python's Stmt/Expr/Scope/Pattern and adds two
synthetic kinds of node (BlockStmt for body slots, intermediate
nodes for multi-operand boolean expressions).
- semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg — public facade
re-exposing the same API surface as semmle/python/Flow.qll
(ControlFlowNode, CallNode, BasicBlock, NameNode, DefinitionNode,
CompareNode, ...), backed by the shared CFG.
- lib/printCfgNew.ql — debug/visualisation query for the new CFG.
- consistency-queries/CfgConsistency.ql — consistency query running
the shared CFG's standard checks against Python.
Shared library:
- shared.controlflow.ControlFlowGraph — adds two defaulted
getWhileElse / getForeachElse predicates to AstSig so Python can
model while-else / for-else (no behavioural change for other
languages).
Test additions:
- ControlFlow/bindings/* — annotation-driven SSA-binding tests for
the new CFG (annassign, compound, comprehension, decorated,
except_handler, imports, match_pattern, parameters, simple,
type_params, walrus_starred, with_stmt, dead_under_no_raise).
- ControlFlow/store-load/* — basic store/load coverage.
- ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfg*.ql — mirrors of the existing
OldCfg evaluation-order self-validation suite, run against the
new CFG via NewCfgImpl.qll.
- Minor extensions to existing test_if.py / test_boolean.py +
cosmetic .expected churn on a handful of OldCfg tests.
No dataflow, SSA, or production query is migrated yet — that lands in
follow-up PRs. The new CFG library has zero callers in lib/ and src/.
Verified by:
- All lib + src + consistency-queries compile clean (367 queries).
- All 56 ControlFlow library-tests pass.
- All 474 dataflow + PointsTo library-tests + consistency tests pass.
- syntax_error/CONSISTENCY/CfgConsistency passes.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This one is potentially a bit iffy -- it checks for a very powerful
property (that implies many of the other queries), but as the test
results show, it can produce false positives when there is in fact no
problem. We may want to get rid of it entirely, if it becomes too noisy.
