Commit Graph

219 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Arthur Baars
0f313231bc AlertSuppression: add more tests 2022-12-19 16:43:11 +01:00
Arthur Baars
06736e3e91 Add .gitattributes for Windows test files 2022-12-19 12:39:01 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
50414cc748 Make DataFlowType a singleton 2022-12-14 14:40:15 +00:00
Alvaro Muñoz
8a27660615 change handler function name 2022-11-18 09:43:17 +01:00
Alvaro Muñoz
7496b61b8d Add rsync since both --rsh and --rsync-path admit commands 2022-11-18 09:43:17 +01:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
1a65a27fde Update test expectations
In https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/8641, `localFlowExit` was
changed to use `Stage2::readStepCand` instead of `read`, which means
that the big-step relation is broken up less. This causes test result
changes. Nothing is lost from the `select` clause, but some results may
have fewer paths, and fewer nodes and edges are output in the test
results.
2022-11-17 14:27:06 +00:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
71aeeee7c8 Accept trivial change to test output
In the `subpaths` section, the last node is now printed without its type
if it is the sink of the path.

This comes from the commit "Dataflow: Bugfix: include subpaths ending at
a sink. " in https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/7526
2022-11-17 14:27:06 +00:00
Chris Smowton
3573e211cc Correct test expectations 2022-10-29 11:40:58 +01:00
Chris Smowton
5c66d87ed6 gofmt 2022-10-29 11:40:57 +01:00
Chris Smowton
0c6c135967 Go: exclude protobuf read steps from cleartext-logging query
This query already treats structs differently to usual: it includes field -> whole struct taint steps, but explicitly excludes struct -> field steps. This means that a logging framework sinking an entire struct with a tainted field yields an alert, but we don't get FPs caused by writing field `x` but then reading field `y`.

However, protobuf messages have a special treatment, with taint usually associated with the whole struct and getter methods propagating that taint out. Suppressing these getter method steps specifically for the cleartext-logging query mirrors its treatment of structs in general and avoids this sort of field-mismatch FP.

On the downside we will miss same-field propagation like `m.field = password; Log(m.GetField())` if we don't have source code for the implementation of `m`. However this is hopefully unusual since the typical use of protobufs is to serialize and deserialize, rather than using the struct as a general-purpose datastructure.
2022-10-29 11:40:57 +01:00
Henry Mercer
c1984ea35f Go: Update expected output 2022-10-26 19:11:21 +01:00
Josh Soref
b1052992fe spelling: against
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-10-11 00:23:35 -04:00
erik-krogh
d5c45056bd fix some more style-guide violations in the alert-messages 2022-10-07 11:21:01 +02:00
erik-krogh
83bedc0320 be more specific about what the source is in go/suspicious-character-in-regex, which also avoids using "here" in the alert-message 2022-09-20 22:51:35 +02:00
erik-krogh
1be14962a0 use "depends to" for a taint-tracking query 2022-09-20 22:51:35 +02:00
erik-krogh
c241185c21 avoid more instances of "this location" and "here" in alert-messages 2022-09-20 22:51:35 +02:00
erik-krogh
2602a38d94 update expected test output 2022-09-20 22:51:35 +02:00
erik-krogh
7e0bd5bde4 update expected output of tests 2022-08-22 21:41:47 +02:00
Chuan-kai Lin
aa514fff32 codeql-go merge prep: move into go/ directory 2022-05-20 10:07:19 -07:00