8 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	83f87f0272	Python: Adjust .expected based on new comment ... That was changed in 9866214	2021-12-17 15:29:41 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	1d00730753	Python: Allow http[s]:// prefix for SSRF	2021-12-17 00:27:18 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	8d9a797b75	Python: Add tricky .format SSRF tests	2021-12-17 00:24:51 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	6f297f4e9c	Python: Fix SSRF sanitizer tests ... They were very misleading before, because a sanitizer that happened early, would remove taint from the rest of the cases by use-use flow :|	2021-12-16 23:24:08 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	4b5599fe17	Python: Improve full/partial SSRF split ... Now full-ssrf will only alert if **all** URL parts are fully user-controlled.	2021-12-16 22:48:51 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	cb934e17b1	Python: Adjust SSRF location to request call ... Since that might not be the same place where the vulnerable URL part is.	2021-12-16 22:48:51 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	b1bca85162	Python: Add interesting test-case	2021-12-16 22:48:51 +01:00
Rasmus Wriedt Larsen	1cc5e54357	Python: Add SSRF queries ... I've added 2 queries: - one that detects full SSRF, where an attacker can control the full URL, which is always bad - and one for partial SSRF, where an attacker can control parts of an URL (such as the path, query parameters, or fragment), which is not a big problem in many cases (but might still be exploitable) full SSRF should run by default, and partial SSRF should not (but makes it easy to see the other results). Some elements of the full SSRF queries needs a bit more polishing, like being able to detect `"https://" + user_input` is in fact controlling the full URL.	2021-12-16 01:48:34 +01:00