Tom Hvitved
301bd44a4c
Rust: Add type inference tests for index expressions
2025-06-11 13:08:59 +02:00
Owen Mansel-Chan
c8a5418969
Remove trailing spaces and extra blank lines
2025-06-11 12:03:17 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
eeaccc5a9a
Update shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll
...
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com >
2025-06-11 12:48:06 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
9f8a3abcff
Rust: Add another type inference debug predicate
2025-06-11 12:44:17 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
b90e8679a9
Shared: Add elaborate QL doc to TypeInference.qll
2025-06-11 12:38:04 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
75caa182f5
Merge pull request #19724 from github/rust/type-inference-borrow
...
Rust: Implement type inference for ref expression as type equality
2025-06-11 12:36:43 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
58266e6ca8
Merge branch 'main' into redsun82/rust-extract-libs
2025-06-11 12:13:10 +02:00
Napalys Klicius
92084dd74f
JS: add js/template-syntax-in-string-literal to the Code Quality suite.
2025-06-11 11:48:05 +02:00
idrissrio
645ce5bbda
C++: update change note after review comments
2025-06-11 11:41:51 +02:00
idrissrio
2bae21cbcd
C++: address review comments
2025-06-11 11:41:50 +02:00
idrissrio
f759550e5a
C++: update stats file
2025-06-11 11:41:49 +02:00
idrissrio
e4a9a5aee8
C++: add upgrade and downgrade scripts
2025-06-11 11:41:48 +02:00
idrissrio
b0c0fb9699
C++: Add change node
2025-06-11 11:41:47 +02:00
idrissrio
cb17a35cbd
C++: Add test to check lambda parameters emptyness
2025-06-11 11:41:46 +02:00
idrissrio
6c9959d8bc
C++: Add predicates for lambda parameter list
2025-06-11 11:41:45 +02:00
idrissrio
3ecc4c9ad7
C++: Adapt existing code to use the new layout of the underlying lambda table
2025-06-11 11:41:44 +02:00
idrissrio
9ac9607cb7
C++: Add boolean for explicit lambda parameter list
2025-06-11 11:41:43 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
fbcd9eaf09
Merge pull request #19674 from github/redsun82/mad
...
Rust: regenerate MaD files using DCA
2025-06-11 11:10:08 +02:00
Napalys Klicius
6811cad687
Merge pull request #19711 from Napalys/js/quality/promote_duplicate_char_class
...
JS: Promote `js/regex/duplicate-in-character-class` to quality
2025-06-11 11:05:07 +02:00
Asger F
e848aa747b
JS: Clarifying comment on commonStep
2025-06-11 10:24:21 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
3c9cbf186e
Rust: Fix bad join in typeParametersEqualFromIndex
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@9c099swn was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 154ms (delta sizes total: 0).
16307861 ~1% {5} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.1
37736 ~1% {7} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.1, _, In.5
0 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (InOut.6 - Tmp.5)
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 6 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {8} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, _, Lhs.5, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6
12808446 ~1% {5} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
22081 ~1% {7} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5
0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.5, _
{8} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5
22081 ~1% {8} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
22081 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.5, _, In.3, In.0, In.1, In.4
22081 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
22081 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
37736 ~1% {8} r7 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7
37736 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, _, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
37736 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
37736 ~1% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {6} r8 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7
0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r8
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@81728ywe was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 2ms (delta sizes total: 0).
0 ~0% {6} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {6} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.2, _
0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
66609 ~1% {3} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#reorder_0_4_1_2_3_5#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, _, Rhs.5, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (Tmp.6 + In.7), Tmp.8 := 0, TEST Out.6 != Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.5, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {8} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, In.5, _
{6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {6} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r5
```
2025-06-11 10:23:57 +02:00
Asger F
2aa5fa17f7
JS: Add comment and examples in FlowImpl doc
2025-06-11 10:21:24 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
79e1af04df
Rust: Fix bad join in satisfiesConstraintTypeMention
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@e8671rw7 was evaluated in 378 iterations totaling 313ms (delta sizes total: 168323).
462477 ~1% {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
993561 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
993561 ~38% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
772102 ~427% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.4, In.5, In.2, In.6, In.1
56885 ~1% {4} r2 = SCAN TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#prev_delta OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2
0 ~0% {7} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1
462477 ~1% {8} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
993561 ~39% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
23413 ~1% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
2817 ~7% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
11550 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
2397 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.0, In.5, In.4
66727 ~0% {6} r5 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3
19305359 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4
3454881 ~1% {10} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.6, Lhs.8, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7
753104 ~1% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a_01243#join_rhs` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.9, Rhs.4
32040 ~18% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.2
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
13192 ~54% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
13192 ~54% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
13192 ~55% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0
0 ~0% {8} r6 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.7, Rhs.3
0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7, Lhs.8
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2
0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4
787691 ~403% {6} r7 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6
212766 ~54% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r7
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@9c099xwn was evaluated in 380 iterations totaling 11ms (delta sizes total: 153004).
768937 ~1% {7} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention0/9#c82a4f76#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.5, In.8, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.7
{7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
745524 ~423% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1
26916 ~0% {9} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, _, Rhs.6, Lhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
8530 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0
11763 ~1% {9} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7
2461 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4
756515 ~396% {6} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
155599 ~6% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6)
return r4
```
2025-06-11 10:04:15 +02:00
Geoffrey White
ecac0dbe69
Rust: Accept consistency check failures.
2025-06-11 08:52:52 +01:00
Tom Hvitved
f9915e66a7
Rust: Fix bad join in satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@061312x0 was evaluated in 367 iterations totaling 3484ms (delta sizes total: 563408).
66609 ~0% {3} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.0
867138261 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_210#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1
29320 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
29320 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.3, In.2, In.0
29320 ~0% {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
{4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.4 KEEPING 4
29320 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, _, In.3
29320 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3)
29296 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
29320 ~0% {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, _, In.1, In.0, In.3
0 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0
0 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _
0 ~0% {4} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0
563353 ~1% {4} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3
563353 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, _, Lhs.3, _
{4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4
563353 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.0, In.1
258647 ~1% {5} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
102998 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3
52485 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
258647 ~0% {5} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.1
259340 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4
16033 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.1
{6} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
15992 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.1, In.5, In.2, In.0, In.4
68477 ~1% {6} r7 = r5 UNION r6
68477 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.5
465635 ~0% {3} r8 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.2
465635 ~0% {5} r9 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0
465635 ~1% {5} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
275069 ~0% {5} r11 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Rhs.1, Rhs.2
0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.3, _
0 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.1 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5
0 ~0% {5} r12 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.4, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3
465635 ~1% {5} r13 = r10 UNION r12
94444 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0
6 ~20% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
465635 ~0% {5} r14 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, _, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0
0 ~0% {5} r15 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3, In.4
465635 ~1% {5} r16 = r14 UNION r15
465635 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.4
465635 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0
{6} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
465629 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.4, In.3, In.5, In.0
465635 ~1% {6} r17 = r13 UNION r16
465635 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.3
563408 ~1% {4} r18 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r7 UNION r17
563408 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r18
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@e8671bx7 was evaluated in 376 iterations totaling 245ms (delta sizes total: 563353).
563353 ~1% {6} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3, _
563353 ~1% {4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4
259340 ~1% {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
52485 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
259340 ~1% {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3
16033 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
15992 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4
741397 ~1% {7} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
465635 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 = Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
465635 ~1% {5} r5 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.1, In.5, In.0, In.2, _
465635 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0
741397 ~1% {7} r6 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _
275762 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6
0 ~0% {7} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _
{7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5
0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
465635 ~0% {5} r8 = r5 UNION r7
6 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4
29310 ~0% {5} r9 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#reorder_0_4_5_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5
29310 ~0% {6} r10 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.0, In.3, _
0 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0
29310 ~0% {6} r11 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 5
29310 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, _, In.1, In.4
29310 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.3)
29241 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.5
29241 ~0% {5} r12 = r10 UNION r11
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
29241 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4
465635 ~0% {6} r13 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, _
465635 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0
0 ~0% {8} r14 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _
{8} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6
0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, In.3
465635 ~1% {6} r15 = r13 UNION r14
465635 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5
{5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2)
465629 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4
563353 ~1% {4} r16 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r8 UNION r12 UNION r15
563353 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r16
```
2025-06-11 09:15:17 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
bc60d033e5
Rust: Fix bad join in inferAccessType
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4@202c46xq was evaluated in 600 iterations totaling 2282ms (delta sizes total: 5827084).
120407742 ~1% {4} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Access.getTarget/0#dispred#29d66fd1#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::accessDeclarationPositionMatch/2#6c58c89d` CARTESIAN PRODUCT OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Rhs.0, Lhs.0
6495868 ~109% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.2
{4} | AND NOT Type::TypeParameter#f85657da(FIRST 1)
3049994 ~10% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.3, In.0
7891 ~0% {5} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::explicitTypeMatch/5#98ce2c39#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
4445 ~3% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5
4445 ~3% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
4445 ~5% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2
3553075 ~1% {5} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::directTypeMatch/5#319f8680#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
6860451 ~16% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5
6860451 ~19% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
6211129 ~20% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2
115218 ~1% {5} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::typeConstraintBaseTypeMatch/5#ebeb4216#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3
181668 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5
181668 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5
181668 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2
9447236 ~16% {4} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4
5902300 ~4% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4#prev`(FIRST 4)
return r5
```
Afer
```
Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4@061316x0 was evaluated in 600 iterations totaling 1727ms (delta sizes total: 5918371
2025-06-11 09:15:16 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
8c956647de
Rust: Fix bad join in fileImport
...
Before
```
Evaluated relational algebra for predicate PathResolution::fileImport/2#d9e57816@c790f609 with tuple counts:
241 ~0% {3} r1 = JOIN `_Locatable::Locatable.getFile/0#dispred#f7e24934_PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032#shared` WITH `FileSystem::Folder::Append<PathResolution::shouldAppend>::append/2#beb8f79a_201#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.1
291 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::pathAttrImport/3#88463ffa_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2
14978 ~8% {2} r2 = SCAN `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` OUTPUT In.0, In.1
14978 ~8% {2} | STREAM DEDUP
14392 ~9% {2} r3 = r2 AND NOT `PathResolution::modImportNested/3#991244df_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
14392 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0
14355 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf_120#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2
14978 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0
329862 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf_102#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Rhs.1
577 ~3% {4} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImportNestedLookup/3#6cc4b913#ffb` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0
14932 ~0% {4} r5 = r3 UNION r4
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0
15223 ~0% {2} r6 = r1 UNION r5
return r6
```
Afer
```
Evaluated relational algebra for predicate PathResolution::fileImport/2#d9e57816@007bd81i with tuple counts:
241 ~0% {3} r1 = JOIN `_Locatable::Locatable.getFile/0#dispred#f7e24934_PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032#shared` WITH `FileSystem::Folder::Append<PathResolution::shouldAppend>::append/2#beb8f79a_201#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.1
291 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::pathAttrImport/3#88463ffa_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2
14978 ~8% {2} r2 = SCAN `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` OUTPUT In.0, In.1
14978 ~8% {2} | STREAM DEDUP
14392 ~9% {2} r3 = r2 AND NOT `PathResolution::modImportNested/3#991244df_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
14392 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0
14978 ~9% {3} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.0, Lhs.1
577 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImportNestedLookup/3#6cc4b913#ffb` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.0
14969 ~1% {3} r5 = r3 UNION r4
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef_120#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2
14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0
15223 ~0% {2} r6 = r1 UNION r5
return r6
```
2025-06-11 09:15:14 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
63aac1babb
Rust: Fix bad join in getCanonicalPath
...
Before
```
Pipeline standard for PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6@5132b1w8 was evaluated in 107 iterations totaling 1217ms (delta sizes total: 870557).
568160 ~1% {2} r1 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::AssocItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#120fa1ad_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
564597 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
68670 ~1% {2} r2 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::VariantItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#12012145_project#PathResolution::ItemNod__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
68670 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#5` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
49047 ~1% {2} r3 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::StructItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f482e99c_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
49047 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#2` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
229 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::UnionItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f67c4b73_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
229 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#4` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
12207 ~0% {2} r5 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::EnumItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#03ce35b1_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
12207 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::EnumItemNode.getName/0#dispred#f21ce0ed_PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathP__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
26698 ~2% {2} r6 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ModuleItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#2fee2540_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
26698 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
6315 ~1% {2} r7 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::TraitItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#824f98e3_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
6315 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
112374 ~0% {3} r8 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanoni__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _
112374 ~3% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 3
872046 ~1% {2} r9 = SCAN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0
777662505 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#4e7c51c6_10#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.0
150127 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.resolveSelfTy/0#dispred#cf157d04` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, _
150127 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 1
262501 ~1% {3} r10 = r8 UNION r9
230996 ~1% {5} r11 = JOIN r10 WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, _, _
230996 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 4, Out.4 := 0
{3} r12 = r10 AND NOT `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
31487 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, _
31487 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 2, Out.4 := 0
262483 ~0% {5} r13 = r11 UNION r12
262483 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH PRIMITIVE range#bbb ON Lhs.4,Lhs.3,Lhs.2
262483 ~0% {3} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1
142807 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_PathResolution::Imp__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3
870570 ~1% {3} r14 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7 UNION r13
870566 ~1% {3} | AND NOT `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev`(FIRST 3)
return r14
```
After
```
Pipeline standard for PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6@90aba2wd was evaluated in 100 iterations totaling 28ms (delta sizes total: 870531).
568160 ~0% {2} r1 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::AssocItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#120fa1ad_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
564597 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
68670 ~0% {2} r2 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::VariantItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#12012145_project#PathResolution::ItemNod__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
68670 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#5` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
49047 ~0% {2} r3 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::StructItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f482e99c_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
49047 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#2` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
229 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::UnionItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f67c4b73_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
229 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#4` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
12207 ~1% {2} r5 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::EnumItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#03ce35b1_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
12207 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::EnumItemNode.getName/0#dispred#f21ce0ed_PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathP__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
26698 ~0% {2} r6 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ModuleItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#2fee2540_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
26698 ~4% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
6315 ~1% {2} r7 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::TraitItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#824f98e3_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1
6315 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2
150127 ~0% {3} r8 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getSelfCanonicalPath/1#dispred#8ed81fbe#prev_delta` WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#4e7c51c6` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _
150127 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 1
112374 ~1% {3} r9 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanoni__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _
112374 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 3
262501 ~0% {3} r10 = r8 UNION r9
230996 ~1% {5} r11 = JOIN r10 WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, _, _
230996 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 4, Out.4 := 0
{3} r12 = r10 AND NOT `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1)
31487 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, _
31487 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 2, Out.4 := 0
262483 ~1% {5} r13 = r11 UNION r12
262483 ~1% {5} | JOIN WITH PRIMITIVE range#bbb ON Lhs.4,Lhs.3,Lhs.2
262483 ~0% {3} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1
142772 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_PathResolution::Imp__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3
870535 ~1% {3} r14 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7 UNION r13
870531 ~1% {3} | AND NOT `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev`(FIRST 3)
return r14
```
2025-06-11 09:15:13 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
01701de4a7
Rust: Implement type inference for ref expression as type equality
2025-06-11 09:09:22 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
3fed7f5397
Merge pull request #19714 from hvitved/rust/fix-bad-join
...
Rust: Fix bad join
2025-06-11 09:08:52 +02:00
Simon Friis Vindum
8f5d9d7702
Rust: Add type inference tests for borrowing
2025-06-11 08:40:15 +02:00
Ana Scolari
510bbac0e4
Create 2025-06-10-reduce-precision-for-building-cmdline-with-string-concatenation.md
2025-06-10 16:17:32 -07:00
Ana Scolari
857b51be58
Update ExecUnescaped.ql - causing FPs with hard coded strings
...
This query is generating False positives with hard coded strings declared within the function - issue reported by customer. We had a discussion on code_scanning channel on 6/5/25 and the team agreed upon reducing its precision to Medium.
2025-06-10 16:06:22 -07:00
Aditya Sharad
d659d40d58
Merge pull request #19701 from adityasharad/actions/bash-parsing-ranking-performance
...
Actions: Improve Bash parsing performance on command and string interpolations
2025-06-11 00:59:19 +05:30
REDMOND\brodes
7d479940e5
Crypto: Nop out signature operations for now until complete. Minor model update. Remove setting RSA bits as an RSA algorithm. Fix bug in hash algorithm. Add missing PKey encryption to cipher ops. Consolidate ctx initializers. Add unit tests, and alter unit test directory structure to allow for application to other APIs. Update expected files for unit tests (not all updated yet, a work in progress).
2025-06-10 13:37:17 -04:00
Tom Hvitved
64ab7c78c8
Merge pull request #19717 from hvitved/rust/use-get-arg-param
...
Rust: Use `get(An){Arg,Param}` helper predicates
2025-06-10 18:48:51 +02:00
Geoffrey White
e64d083fc1
Rust: Lets also output the total number of nodes to make understanding this easier.
2025-06-10 17:37:42 +01:00
Geoffrey White
50bf246add
Rust: Adjust the taint reach metric for better stability.
2025-06-10 17:08:15 +01:00
Asger F
72cc439125
JS: Normalize a few more extensions
2025-06-10 17:36:56 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
1bd6446f7e
Merge pull request #19715 from jketema/neon-ir-test
...
C++: Add basic Aarch64 Neon IR test
2025-06-10 16:57:46 +02:00
Geoffrey White
652d32d4ff
Merge pull request #19626 from geoffw0/futures
...
Rust: Model futures-io, rustls, futures-rustls
2025-06-10 15:23:43 +01:00
Michael Nebel
dc81f5a6b2
Merge pull request #19713 from michaelnebel/csharp/freezequalityinsecurityandquality
...
C#: Freeze quality queries in the security-and-quality suite.
2025-06-10 16:19:45 +02:00
Asger F
18f9133715
JS: Rename and clarify comment for trackFunctionType
2025-06-10 16:14:46 +02:00
Asger F
a6488cbad9
Update javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/internal/NameResolution.qll
...
Co-authored-by: Erik Krogh Kristensen <erik-krogh@github.com >
2025-06-10 16:06:42 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
a4be27659b
C++: Minor test case reformatting
2025-06-10 15:55:18 +02:00
Michael Nebel
99dc923f1f
C#: Add cs/gethashcode-is-not-defined to the Code Quality suite.
2025-06-10 15:45:41 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
e41b4f4022
Rust: Use get(An){Arg,Param} helper predicates
2025-06-10 15:45:34 +02:00
Jeroen Ketema
7d1b5ce584
C++: Add basic Aarch64 Neon test
2025-06-10 15:34:06 +02:00
Paolo Tranquilli
8f0f2006a8
Merge pull request #19708 from github/redsun82/rust-getArg-getParam
...
Rust: add `Callable::getParam` and `CallExprBase::getArg` shortcuts
2025-06-10 15:31:05 +02:00
Tom Hvitved
209cfb78a3
Rust: Fix bad join
...
```
[2025-06-10 15:21:37] (83s) Tuple counts for TypeMention::PathTypeReprMention.aliasResolveTypeAt/1#dispred#ae16f47b#fbf#cpe#13/2@i5#5a5451wi after 57.7s:
205999 ~1028% {3} r1 = JOIN `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_1_0_2#prev_delta` WITH `_TypeAlias::Generated::TypeAlias.getTypeRepr/0#dispred#5fd7e521_TypeMention::PathTypeReprMention#a35__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2 'result', Rhs.3 'this'
{3} | AND NOT `project#TypeMention::pathGetTypeParameter/2#fd301eed#2`(FIRST 2)
204000 ~982% {2} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2 'this', In.1 'result'
5499 ~448% {7} r2 = JOIN `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1#prev_delta` WITH `_GenericArgList::GenericArgList.getTypeArg/1#dispred#1c780027_PathSegment::Generated::PathSegment.ge__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2 'this', Rhs.3, Lhs.1 'result', _, Lhs.2, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := "", Tmp.6 := "", Out.4 := InverseAppend(Tmp.4,In.5,Tmp.6) KEEPING 5
2500 ~398% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.4, In.1 'this', In.3 'result'
0 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3 'this', Lhs.4 'result'
9000 ~489% {7} r3 = JOIN `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1#prev_delta` WITH `_PathSegment::Generated::PathSegment.getGenericArgList/0#dispred#e072653b__Path::Generated::Path.get__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2 'this', Rhs.3, Lhs.1, _, Lhs.2, _
{5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := "", Tmp.6 := "", Out.4 := InverseAppend(In.5,Tmp.4,Tmp.6) KEEPING 5
5000 ~411% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.0, In.1 'this', In.2, In.3
10461919500 ~610% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_1_0_2#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2 'this', Lhs.4, Rhs.2 'result'
500 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `GenericArgList::GenericArgList.getTypeArg/1#dispred#1c780027_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3 'this', Lhs.5 'result'
0 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::pathGetTypeParameter/2#fd301eed` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3 'this', Lhs.4 'result'
204000 ~982% {2} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3
203964 ~982% {2} | AND NOT `TypeMention::PathTypeReprMention.aliasResolveTypeAt/1#dispred#ae16f47b#fbf#cpe#13#prev`(FIRST 2)
return r4
```
2025-06-10 15:25:05 +02:00
