This file is now identical in all languages. Unifying this file led to
the following changes:
- The documentation spelling fixes and example from the C++ version
were copied to the other versions and updated.
- The steps through `NonLocalJumpNode` from C# were abstracted into a
`globalAdditionalTaintStep` predicate that's empty for C++ and Java.
- The `defaultTaintBarrier` predicate from Java is now present but empty
on C++ and C#.
- The C++ `isAdditionalFlowStep` predicate on
`TaintTracking::Configuration` no longer includes `localFlowStep`.
That should avoid some unnecessary tuple copying.
This class was copy-pasted in all `DataFlowN.qll` files without using
the identical-files system to keep the copies in sync. The class is now
moved to the `DataFlowImplN.qll` files.
This also has the effect of preventing recursion through first data flow
library copy for C/C++. Such recursion has been deprecated for over a
year, and some forms of recursions are already ruled out by the library
implementation.
To compensate for the lack of field flow, the taint tracking library has
previously considered taint to flow from fields to their containing
structs and back again from the structs to any of their fields. This
leads to false flow between unrelated fields and is not needed now that
we have proper flow through fields.
There's now a `localFlowStep` predicate for use directly in queries and
other libraries and a `simpleLocalFlowStep` for use only by the global
data flow library. The former predicate is intended to include field
flow, but the latter may not.
This will let Java and C# (and possibly C++ IR) avoid getting two kinds
of field flow at the same time, both from SSA and from the global data
flow library. It should let C++ AST add some form of field flow to
`localFlowStep` without making it an input to the global data flow
library.
Because `ConstructorFieldInit` (member initializer lists) are not part
of the control flow graph, there was no data flow from the initial value
of parameters to their uses in member initializers. This commit adds the
necessary flow under the assumption that parameters are not overwritten
in member initializers.
This allows a member initializer list to be seen as a sequence of field
assignments. For example, the constructor
C() : a(taint()) { }
now has data flow similar to
C() { this.a = taint(); }
This brings the annotation style in sync with how we annotate new tests
these days. I also changed a few annotations to have different expected
outcome based on my understanding of the code.
