Python: add new shared-CFG-backed control flow graph

Preparatory refactor for the shared-CFG dataflow migration. Adds the
new Python CFG library additively, without changing any production
behaviour.

Library additions:

- semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl — mediates between
  the Python AST and the shared codeql.controlflow.ControlFlowGraph
  signature. Wraps Python's Stmt/Expr/Scope/Pattern and adds two
  synthetic kinds of node (BlockStmt for body slots, intermediate
  nodes for multi-operand boolean expressions).

- semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg — public facade
  re-exposing the same API surface as semmle/python/Flow.qll
  (ControlFlowNode, CallNode, BasicBlock, NameNode, DefinitionNode,
  CompareNode, ...), backed by the shared CFG.

- lib/printCfgNew.ql — debug/visualisation query for the new CFG.

- consistency-queries/CfgConsistency.ql — consistency query running
  the shared CFG's standard checks against Python.

Shared library:

- shared.controlflow.ControlFlowGraph — adds two defaulted
  getWhileElse / getForeachElse predicates to AstSig so Python can
  model while-else / for-else (no behavioural change for other
  languages).

Test additions:

- ControlFlow/bindings/* — annotation-driven SSA-binding tests for
  the new CFG (annassign, compound, comprehension, decorated,
  except_handler, imports, match_pattern, parameters, simple,
  type_params, walrus_starred, with_stmt, dead_under_no_raise).

- ControlFlow/store-load/* — basic store/load coverage.

- ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfg*.ql — mirrors of the existing
  OldCfg evaluation-order self-validation suite, run against the
  new CFG via NewCfgImpl.qll.

- Minor extensions to existing test_if.py / test_boolean.py +
  cosmetic .expected churn on a handful of OldCfg tests.

No dataflow, SSA, or production query is migrated yet — that lands in
follow-up PRs. The new CFG library has zero callers in lib/ and src/.

Verified by:
- All lib + src + consistency-queries compile clean (367 queries).
- All 56 ControlFlow library-tests pass.
- All 474 dataflow + PointsTo library-tests + consistency tests pass.
- syntax_error/CONSISTENCY/CfgConsistency passes.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

python/ql/consistency-queries/CfgConsistency.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+import semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl
+import ControlFlow::Consistency

python/ql/lib/change-notes/2026-05-19-add-shared-cfg.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+---
+category: minorAnalysis
+---
+* A new Python control flow graph implementation has been added under `semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg` (backed by `AstNodeImpl.qll`), built on the shared `codeql.controlflow.ControlFlowGraph` library. It is not yet used by the dataflow library or any production query; the legacy CFG in `semmle/python/Flow.qll` remains the default. The new library is exposed for tests and for upcoming migrations.

python/ql/lib/printCfgNew.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/**
+ * @name Print CFG (New)
+ * @description Produces a representation of a file's Control Flow Graph
+ *              using the new shared control flow library.
+ *              This query is used by the VS Code extension.
+ * @id python/print-cfg
+ * @kind graph
+ * @tags ide-contextual-queries/print-cfg
+ */
+
+private import python as Py
+import semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl
+
+external string selectedSourceFile();
+
+private predicate selectedSourceFileAlias = selectedSourceFile/0;
+
+external int selectedSourceLine();
+
+private predicate selectedSourceLineAlias = selectedSourceLine/0;
+
+external int selectedSourceColumn();
+
+private predicate selectedSourceColumnAlias = selectedSourceColumn/0;
+
+module ViewCfgQueryInput implements ControlFlow::ViewCfgQueryInputSig<Py::File> {
+  predicate selectedSourceFile = selectedSourceFileAlias/0;
+
+  predicate selectedSourceLine = selectedSourceLineAlias/0;
+
+  predicate selectedSourceColumn = selectedSourceColumnAlias/0;
+
+  predicate cfgScopeSpan(
+    Ast::Callable callable, Py::File file, int startLine, int startColumn, int endLine,
+    int endColumn
+  ) {
+    exists(Py::Scope scope |
+      scope = callable.asScope() and
+      file = scope.getLocation().getFile() and
+      scope.getLocation().hasLocationInfo(_, startLine, startColumn, endLine, endColumn)
+    )
+  }
+}
+
+import ControlFlow::ViewCfgQuery<Py::File, ViewCfgQueryInput>

python/ql/test/extractor-tests/syntax_error/CONSISTENCY/CfgConsistency.expected

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+consistencyOverview
+| deadEnd | 1 |
+deadEnd
+| without_loop.py:7:5:7:9 | Break |

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/BindingsTest.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/**
+ * Phase -1 of the dataflow CFG migration: verifies that every variable
+ * binding visible to the AST (`Name.defines(v)`) corresponds to a CFG node
+ * in the new CFG (`semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl`).
+ *
+ * The expected tag is `cfgdefines=<name>`. Each binding annotation in the
+ * test sources looks like `# $ cfgdefines=x` for a binding currently
+ * covered by the new CFG, or `# $ MISSING: cfgdefines=x` for a binding
+ * that is known to be uncovered (a "red" test case that should be
+ * green-flipped once the corresponding `cfg-ext-*` extension lands).
+ */
+
+import python
+import semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl as CfgImpl
+import utils.test.InlineExpectationsTest
+
+module CfgBindingsTest implements TestSig {
+  string getARelevantTag() { result = "cfgdefines" }
+
+  predicate hasActualResult(Location location, string element, string tag, string value) {
+    exists(Name n, Variable v, CfgImpl::ControlFlowNode cfg |
+      n.defines(v) and
+      cfg.getAstNode().asExpr() = n and
+      location = n.getLocation() and
+      element = n.toString() and
+      tag = "cfgdefines" and
+      value = v.getId()
+    )
+  }
+}
+
+import MakeTest<CfgBindingsTest>

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/annassign.py

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+# Annotated assignment (PEP 526). Both with and without an initializer.
+
+a: int = 1  # $ cfgdefines=a
+b: str = "hi"  # $ cfgdefines=b
+
+# Annotation without value: the AST records `c` as defined,
+# and the new CFG now visits it via the AnnAssignStmt wrapper.
+c: int  # $ cfgdefines=c
+
+class K:  # $ cfgdefines=K
+    field: int = 0  # $ cfgdefines=field
+
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/compound.py

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Compound (tuple/list) assignment targets — actually wired in the new CFG.
+
+a, b = (1, 2)  # $ cfgdefines=a cfgdefines=b
+[c, d] = [3, 4]  # $ cfgdefines=c cfgdefines=d
+
+# Nested unpacking.
+(e, (f, g)) = (1, (2, 3))  # $ cfgdefines=e cfgdefines=f cfgdefines=g
+
+# Star unpacking.
+h, *i = [1, 2, 3]  # $ cfgdefines=h cfgdefines=i
+
+# Chained assignment with compound target.
+j = k, l = (5, 6)  # $ cfgdefines=j cfgdefines=k cfgdefines=l
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/comprehension.py

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Comprehension and `for` loop targets — wired in the new CFG.
+# Comprehensions are nested function scopes with a synthetic `.0` parameter
+# bound to the iterable.
+
+# Bare-name `for` target.
+for i in range(3):  # $ cfgdefines=i
+    pass
+
+# Compound `for` target.
+for k, v in [(1, 2)]:  # $ cfgdefines=k cfgdefines=v
+    pass
+
+# Comprehension targets.
+_ = [x for x in range(3)]  # $ cfgdefines=_ cfgdefines=x cfgdefines=.0
+_ = {y: z for y, z in []}  # $ cfgdefines=_ cfgdefines=y cfgdefines=z cfgdefines=.0
+_ = (a for a in [])  # $ cfgdefines=_ cfgdefines=a cfgdefines=.0
+
+# Nested comprehensions.
+_ = [b for c in [] for b in c]  # $ cfgdefines=_ cfgdefines=c cfgdefines=b cfgdefines=.0
+
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/dead_under_no_raise.py

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Dead bindings under the "no expressions raise" CFG abstraction.
+#
+# The new CFG does not currently model raise edges from arbitrary
+# expressions. As a consequence, code that is only reachable through
+# exception flow is (correctly) classified as dead and has no CFG node.
+# Variable bindings in dead code do not need CFG nodes - SSA / dataflow
+# over dead code is moot.
+#
+# These tests act as a regression guard: the bindings below intentionally
+# have no `cfgdefines=` annotations. If raise modelling is later added,
+# the BindingsTest infrastructure will surface the new CFG nodes as
+# unexpected results, and this file will need to be revisited.
+
+
+def f(obj):  # $ cfgdefines=f cfgdefines=obj
+    try:
+        return len(obj)
+    except TypeError:
+        pass
+
+    # The first try's body always returns; its except handler does not
+    # raise or otherwise transfer control, so under "no expressions
+    # raise" the only paths out of the try-statement are dead. Everything
+    # below is unreachable.
+    try:
+        hint = type(obj).__length_hint__
+    except AttributeError:
+        return None
+    return hint
+
+
+def g():  # $ cfgdefines=g
+    try:
+        raise Exception("inner")
+    except:
+        raise Exception("outer")
+    else:
+        # Unreachable: the inner try body always raises, so the `else:`
+        # clause never runs.
+        hit_inner_else = True
+
+
+def h(cache, key):  # $ cfgdefines=h cfgdefines=cache cfgdefines=key
+    try:
+        return cache[key]
+    except KeyError:
+        pass
+
+    # Same pattern as `f`: dead under "no expressions raise".
+    value = compute(key)
+    cache[key] = value
+    return value

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/decorated.py

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Decorated `def`/`class` — wired in the new CFG.
+
+
+def deco(f):  # $ cfgdefines=deco cfgdefines=f
+    return f
+
+
+@deco
+def decorated_func():  # $ cfgdefines=decorated_func
+    pass
+
+
+@deco
+class DecoratedClass:  # $ cfgdefines=DecoratedClass
+    pass
+
+
+# Stacked decorators.
+@deco
+@deco
+def doubly():  # $ cfgdefines=doubly
+    pass
+
+
+# Inside a class body.
+class Outer:  # $ cfgdefines=Outer
+    @staticmethod
+    def inner():  # $ cfgdefines=inner
+        pass
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/except_handler.py

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# Exception-handler name bindings. These are already wired in the new
+# CFG provided the try body can raise; `raise` statements are reliably
+# treated as exception sources.
+
+try:
+    raise ValueError("oops")
+except ValueError as e:  # $ cfgdefines=e
+    pass
+
+try:
+    raise TypeError("oops")
+except (TypeError, KeyError) as err:  # $ cfgdefines=err
+    pass
+
+# Exception groups (Python 3.11+).
+try:
+    raise ValueError("oops")
+except* ValueError as eg:  # $ cfgdefines=eg
+    pass

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/imports.py

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Import aliases — all bound names below are now reachable via the new
+# CFG's `ImportStmt` wrapper.
+
+import os  # $ cfgdefines=os
+import os.path  # $ cfgdefines=os
+import os as o  # $ cfgdefines=o
+from os import path  # $ cfgdefines=path
+from os import path as p  # $ cfgdefines=p
+from os import sep, linesep  # $ cfgdefines=sep cfgdefines=linesep
+from os import (
+    getcwd,  # $ cfgdefines=getcwd
+    getcwdb,  # $ cfgdefines=getcwdb
+)
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/match_pattern.py

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Match-statement pattern bindings — wired in the new CFG.
+
+def f(subject):  # $ cfgdefines=f cfgdefines=subject
+    match subject:
+        case x:  # $ cfgdefines=x
+            pass
+        case [a, b]:  # $ cfgdefines=a cfgdefines=b
+            pass
+        case {"k": v}:  # $ cfgdefines=v
+            pass
+        case Point(p, q):  # $ cfgdefines=p cfgdefines=q
+            pass
+        case [_, *rest]:  # $ cfgdefines=rest
+            pass
+        case (1 | 2) as n:  # $ cfgdefines=n
+            pass
+
+
+class Point:  # $ cfgdefines=Point
+    __match_args__ = ("x", "y")  # $ cfgdefines=__match_args__
+    x: int  # $ cfgdefines=x
+    y: int  # $ cfgdefines=y
+
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/parameters.py

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# Function parameters.
+
+def positional(a, b):  # $ cfgdefines=positional cfgdefines=a cfgdefines=b
+    pass
+
+
+def with_default(x=1, y=2):  # $ cfgdefines=with_default cfgdefines=x cfgdefines=y
+    pass
+
+
+def with_vararg(*args):  # $ cfgdefines=with_vararg cfgdefines=args
+    pass
+
+
+def with_kwarg(**kwargs):  # $ cfgdefines=with_kwarg cfgdefines=kwargs
+    pass
+
+
+def with_kwonly(*, k1, k2=5):  # $ cfgdefines=with_kwonly cfgdefines=k1 cfgdefines=k2
+    pass
+
+
+def kitchen_sink(a, b=2, *args, k1, k2=5, **kw):  # $ cfgdefines=kitchen_sink cfgdefines=a cfgdefines=b cfgdefines=args cfgdefines=k1 cfgdefines=k2 cfgdefines=kw
+    pass
+
+
+# Methods get `self` / `cls`.
+class C:  # $ cfgdefines=C
+    def method(self, x):  # $ cfgdefines=method cfgdefines=self cfgdefines=x
+        pass
+
+    @classmethod
+    def cmethod(cls, x):  # $ cfgdefines=cmethod cfgdefines=cls cfgdefines=x
+        pass
+
+
+# Lambda parameter.
+_ = lambda p: p + 1  # $ cfgdefines=_ cfgdefines=p
+
+# PEP 570 positional-only.
+def pos_only(a, b, /, c):  # $ cfgdefines=pos_only cfgdefines=a cfgdefines=b cfgdefines=c
+    pass

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/simple.py

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Simple bindings that should already work in the new CFG.
+# No MISSING annotations expected.
+
+x = 1  # $ cfgdefines=x
+y = x + 1  # $ cfgdefines=y
+
+def f():  # $ cfgdefines=f
+    pass
+
+class C:  # $ cfgdefines=C
+    pass
+
+# Re-assignment.
+x = 2  # $ cfgdefines=x

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/type_params.py

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# PEP 695 type parameters (Python 3.12+).
+
+# PEP 695 type-param names on `def`/`class` bind in an annotation scope
+# that nests the function/class body — they have no CFG node in the
+# enclosing scope (matching the legacy CFG).
+def func[T](x: T) -> T:  # $ cfgdefines=func cfgdefines=x
+    return x
+
+
+class Box[T]:  # $ cfgdefines=Box
+    item: T  # $ cfgdefines=item
+
+
+# Multi-parameter, with bound and variadics.
+def multi[T: int, *Ts, **P](x: T, *args: *Ts, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> T:  # $ cfgdefines=multi cfgdefines=x cfgdefines=args cfgdefines=kwargs
+    return x
+
+
+# `type` statement (PEP 695).
+type Alias[T] = list[T]  # $ cfgdefines=Alias cfgdefines=T
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/walrus_starred.py

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Walrus and starred-target edge cases — wired in the new CFG.
+
+# Walrus in expression context.
+if (y := 5) > 0:  # $ cfgdefines=y
+    pass
+
+# Walrus in a comprehension. The comprehension introduces a synthetic
+# `.0` parameter bound to the iterable.
+_ = [w for _ in range(3) if (w := 1)]  # $ cfgdefines=_ cfgdefines=w cfgdefines=.0
+
+# Starred target in a Tuple LHS.
+*head, tail = [1, 2, 3]  # $ cfgdefines=head cfgdefines=tail
+
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/bindings/with_stmt.py

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# `with cm() as x:` bindings — wired in the new CFG.
+
+class CM:  # $ cfgdefines=CM
+    def __enter__(self): return self  # $ cfgdefines=__enter__ cfgdefines=self
+    def __exit__(self, *a): pass  # $ cfgdefines=__exit__ cfgdefines=self cfgdefines=a
+
+with CM() as x:  # $ cfgdefines=x
+    pass
+
+# Multiple items.
+with CM() as a, CM() as b:  # $ cfgdefines=a cfgdefines=b
+    pass
+
+# Parenthesised form (Python 3.10+).
+with (CM() as p, CM() as q):  # $ cfgdefines=p cfgdefines=q
+    pass
+
+# Compound target in `with`.
+with CM() as (m, n):  # $ cfgdefines=m cfgdefines=n
+    pass
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/AllLiveReachable.ql

@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
  * have separate CFGs and are excluded from this check.
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/AnnotationHasCfgNode.ql

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
  * Checks that every timer annotation has a corresponding CFG node.
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/BasicBlockAnnotationGap.ql

@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
  * edge leaves the basic block and the normal successor may be dead.
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/BasicBlockOrdering.expected

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 | test_boolean.py:9:10:9:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:9:59:9:59 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 2 | test_boolean.py:9:19:9:19 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:15:10:15:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:15:50:15:50 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 1 | test_boolean.py:15:20:15:20 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:21:10:21:42 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:21:49:21:49 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 1 | test_boolean.py:21:19:21:19 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
-| test_boolean.py:27:10:27:34 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:27:50:27:50 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 2 | test_boolean.py:27:20:27:20 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
+| test_boolean.py:27:10:27:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:27:59:27:59 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 2 | test_boolean.py:27:20:27:20 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:40:10:40:61 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:40:86:40:86 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 3 | test_boolean.py:40:16:40:16 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:46:10:46:61 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:46:86:46:86 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 3 | test_boolean.py:46:16:46:16 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:52:10:52:95 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@ | test_boolean.py:52:120:52:120 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 4 | test_boolean.py:52:20:52:20 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/BasicBlockOrdering.ql

@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
  * increasing minimum-timestamp order.
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/ConsecutiveTimestamps.ql

@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
  * lambdas that have annotations in nested scopes).
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/ContiguousTimestamps.ql

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
  * in at least one annotation (live or dead).
  */
 
+import python
 import TimerUtils
 
 from TestFunction f, int missing, int maxTs, TimerAnnotation maxAnn

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NeverReachable.ql

@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
  * entry (including within the same basic block).
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgAllLiveReachable.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/** New-CFG version of AllLiveReachable. */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerCfgNode a, TestFunction f
+where allLiveReachable(a, f)
+select a, "Unreachable live annotation; entry of $@ does not reach this node", f, f.getName()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgAnnotationHasCfgNode.expected

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgAnnotationHasCfgNode.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of AnnotationHasCfgNode.
+ *
+ * Checks that every timer annotation has a corresponding CFG node.
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerAnnotation ann
+where annotationWithoutCfgNode(ann)
+select ann, "Annotation in $@ has no CFG node", ann.getTestFunction(),
+  ann.getTestFunction().getName()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgBasicBlockAnnotationGap.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of BasicBlockAnnotationGap.
+ *
+ * Original:
+ * Checks that within a basic block, if a node is annotated then its
+ * successor is also annotated (or excluded). A gap in annotations
+ * within a basic block indicates a missing annotation, since there
+ * are no branches to justify the gap.
+ *
+ * Nodes with exceptional successors are excluded, as the exception
+ * edge leaves the basic block and the normal successor may be dead.
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerCfgNode a, CfgNode succ
+where basicBlockAnnotationGap(a, succ)
+select a, "Annotated node followed by unannotated $@ in the same basic block", succ,
+  succ.getNode().toString()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgBasicBlockOrdering.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of BasicBlockOrdering.
+ *
+ * Original:
+ * Checks that within a single basic block, annotations appear in
+ * increasing minimum-timestamp order.
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerCfgNode a, TimerCfgNode b, int minA, int minB
+where basicBlockOrdering(a, b, minA, minB)
+select a, "Basic block ordering: $@ appears before $@", a.getTimestampExpr(minA),
+  "timestamp " + minA, b.getTimestampExpr(minB), "timestamp " + minB

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgBranchTimestamps.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of BranchTimestamps.
+ *
+ * Checks that when a node has both a true and false successor, the
+ * live timestamps on one branch are marked as dead on the other.
+ * This ensures that boolean branches are fully annotated with dead()
+ * markers for the paths not taken.
+ *
+ * Limitation: the `@ t[ts, ...]` / `dead(ts)` annotation scheme can only
+ * model branch-dead-ness for plain boolean control flow that reconverges
+ * linearly after the split — i.e. `if`-with-else and `if`-expression.
+ * It cannot model:
+ *
+ *   * loops (`while` / `for`): body timestamps repeat across iterations,
+ *     so the loop-exit annotation can't list them as dead;
+ *   * `match` statements: each `case` body is a syntactically distinct
+ *     sub-tree, and the branches don't reconverge through a common
+ *     annotation point in the timeline;
+ *   * `try` / `with` and `raise` / `assert`: exception edges are modelled
+ *     as true/false but flow to syntactically distinct handlers, with no
+ *     reconvergence in the linear annotation order;
+ *   * short-circuit `and` / `or` (`BoolExpr`): the branches reconverge at
+ *     the BoolExpr's after-node, so timestamps on one branch are live
+ *     downstream of the other rather than dead;
+ *   * `if` without an `else` clause, and `if`/`elif` chains: the false
+ *     branch reconverges with the true branch at the post-if statement
+ *     (no-else) or fans out across multiple elif-test annotations,
+ *     neither of which fit the binary annotation scheme.
+ *
+ * Branch nodes inside those constructs are therefore whitelisted out
+ * below. The check still fires (and is useful) for plain `if`/`else`
+ * and conditional-expression branching.
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+/**
+ * Holds if `f` contains a construct whose branches the linear-timestamp
+ * annotation scheme cannot describe (see file-level comment).
+ */
+private predicate hasUnmodellableBranching(Function f) {
+  exists(AstNode bad |
+    bad.getScope() = f and
+    (
+      bad instanceof While
+      or
+      bad instanceof For
+      or
+      bad instanceof MatchStmt
+      or
+      bad instanceof Try
+      or
+      bad instanceof With
+      or
+      bad instanceof Raise
+      or
+      bad instanceof Assert
+      or
+      bad instanceof BoolExpr
+      or
+      bad instanceof If and
+      (not exists(bad.(If).getAnOrelse()) or bad.(If).isElif())
+    )
+  )
+}
+
+from TimerCfgNode node, int ts, string branch
+where
+  missingBranchTimestamp(node, ts, branch) and
+  not hasUnmodellableBranching(node.getTestFunction())
+select node,
+  "Timestamp " + ts + " on true/false branch is missing a dead() annotation on the " + branch +
+    " successor in $@", node.getTestFunction(), node.getTestFunction().getName()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgConsecutivePredecessorTimestamps.expected

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgConsecutivePredecessorTimestamps.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of ConsecutivePredecessorTimestamps.
+ *
+ * Checks that each annotated node (except the minimum timestamp) has
+ * a predecessor annotation with timestamp `a - 1`. This is the reverse
+ * of ConsecutiveTimestamps: it catches nodes that are reachable but
+ * arrived at from the wrong place (skipping an intermediate node).
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerAnnotation ann, int a
+where consecutivePredecessorTimestamps(ann, a)
+select ann, "$@ in $@ has no consecutive predecessor (expected " + (a - 1) + ")",
+  ann.getTimestampExpr(a), "Timestamp " + a, ann.getTestFunction(), ann.getTestFunction().getName()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgConsecutiveTimestamps.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of ConsecutiveTimestamps.
+ *
+ * Original:
+ * Checks that consecutive annotated nodes have consecutive timestamps:
+ * for each annotation with timestamp `a`, some CFG node for that annotation
+ * must have a next annotation containing `a + 1`.
+ *
+ * Handles CFG splitting (e.g., finally blocks duplicated for normal/exceptional
+ * flow) by checking that at least one split has the required successor.
+ *
+ * Only applies to functions where all annotations are in the function's
+ * own scope (excludes tests with generators, async, comprehensions, or
+ * lambdas that have annotations in nested scopes).
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerAnnotation ann, int a
+where consecutiveTimestamps(ann, a)
+select ann, "$@ in $@ has no consecutive successor (expected " + (a + 1) + ")",
+  ann.getTimestampExpr(a), "Timestamp " + a, ann.getTestFunction(), ann.getTestFunction().getName()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgImpl.qll

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/**
+ * Implementation of the evaluation-order CFG signature using the new
+ * shared control flow graph from AstNodeImpl.
+ */
+
+private import python as Py
+import TimerUtils
+private import semmle.python.controlflow.internal.AstNodeImpl as CfgImpl
+private import codeql.controlflow.SuccessorType
+
+private class NewControlFlowNode = CfgImpl::ControlFlowNode;
+
+private class NewBasicBlock = CfgImpl::BasicBlock;
+
+/** New (shared) CFG implementation of the evaluation-order signature. */
+module NewCfg implements EvalOrderCfgSig {
+  class CfgNode instanceof NewControlFlowNode {
+    // Use the post-order representative for each AST node: the "after" node.
+    // For simple leaf nodes this is the merged before/after node. For
+    // post-order expressions this is the TAstNode. For pre-order expressions
+    // (and/or/not/ternary) this uses an AfterValueNode, which places the
+    // expression after its operands — matching the timer test expectations.
+    CfgNode() { NewControlFlowNode.super.isAfter(_) }
+
+    string toString() { result = NewControlFlowNode.super.toString() }
+
+    Py::Location getLocation() { result = NewControlFlowNode.super.getLocation() }
+
+    Py::AstNode getNode() {
+      result = CfgImpl::astNodeToPyNode(NewControlFlowNode.super.getAstNode())
+    }
+
+    CfgNode getASuccessor() { nextCfgNode(this, result) }
+
+    CfgNode getATrueSuccessor() {
+      NewControlFlowNode.super.isAfterTrue(_) and
+      // Only where there's also a false branch (true boolean split)
+      exists(NewControlFlowNode other | other.isAfterFalse(NewControlFlowNode.super.getAstNode())) and
+      nextCfgNodeFrom(this, result)
+    }
+
+    CfgNode getAFalseSuccessor() {
+      NewControlFlowNode.super.isAfterFalse(_) and
+      // Only where there's also a true branch (true boolean split)
+      exists(NewControlFlowNode other | other.isAfterTrue(NewControlFlowNode.super.getAstNode())) and
+      nextCfgNodeFrom(this, result)
+    }
+
+    CfgNode getAnExceptionalSuccessor() {
+      exists(NewControlFlowNode mid |
+        mid = NewControlFlowNode.super.getAnExceptionSuccessor() and
+        nextCfgNodeFrom(mid, result)
+      )
+    }
+
+    Py::Scope getScope() { result = NewControlFlowNode.super.getEnclosingCallable().asScope() }
+
+    BasicBlock getBasicBlock() {
+      exists(NewBasicBlock bb, int i | bb.getNode(i) = this and result = bb)
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Holds if `next` is the nearest CfgNode reachable from `n` via
+   * one or more raw CFG successor edges, skipping non-CfgNode intermediaries.
+   */
+  private predicate nextCfgNodeFrom(NewControlFlowNode n, CfgNode next) {
+    next = n.getASuccessor()
+    or
+    exists(NewControlFlowNode mid |
+      mid = n.getASuccessor() and
+      not mid instanceof CfgNode and
+      nextCfgNodeFrom(mid, next)
+    )
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Holds if `next` is the nearest CfgNode successor of `n`,
+   * skipping synthetic intermediate nodes.
+   */
+  private predicate nextCfgNode(CfgNode n, CfgNode next) { nextCfgNodeFrom(n, next) }
+
+  class BasicBlock instanceof NewBasicBlock {
+    string toString() { result = NewBasicBlock.super.toString() }
+
+    CfgNode getNode(int n) { result = NewBasicBlock.super.getNode(n) }
+
+    predicate reaches(BasicBlock bb) { this = bb or this.strictlyReaches(bb) }
+
+    predicate strictlyReaches(BasicBlock bb) { NewBasicBlock.super.getASuccessor+() = bb }
+
+    predicate strictlyDominates(BasicBlock bb) { NewBasicBlock.super.strictlyDominates(bb) }
+  }
+
+  CfgNode scopeGetEntryNode(Py::Scope s) {
+    exists(CfgImpl::ControlFlow::EntryNode entry |
+      entry.getEnclosingCallable().asScope() = s and
+      nextCfgNodeFrom(entry, result)
+    )
+  }
+}

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgNeverReachable.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of NeverReachable.
+ *
+ * Original:
+ * Checks that expressions annotated with `t.never` either have no CFG
+ * node, or if they do, that the node is not reachable from its scope's
+ * entry (including within the same basic block).
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerAnnotation ann
+where neverReachable(ann)
+select ann, "Node annotated with t.never is reachable in $@", ann.getTestFunction(),
+  ann.getTestFunction().getName()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgNoBackwardFlow.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of NoBackwardFlow.
+ *
+ * Original:
+ * Checks that time never flows backward between consecutive timer annotations
+ * in the CFG. For each pair of consecutive annotated nodes (A -> B), there must
+ * exist timestamps a in A and b in B with a < b.
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerCfgNode a, TimerCfgNode b, int minA, int maxB
+where noBackwardFlow(a, b, minA, maxB)
+select a, "Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@)", a.getTimestampExpr(minA),
+  minA.toString(), b, b.getNode().toString(), b.getTimestampExpr(maxB), maxB.toString()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgNoBasicBlock.expected

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgNoBasicBlock.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of NoBasicBlock.
+ *
+ * Checks that every annotated CFG node belongs to a basic block.
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from CfgNode n, TestFunction f
+where noBasicBlock(n, f)
+select n, "CFG node in $@ does not belong to any basic block", f, f.getName()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgNoSharedReachable.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of NoSharedReachable.
+ *
+ * Original:
+ * Checks that two annotations sharing a timestamp value are on
+ * mutually exclusive CFG paths (neither can reach the other).
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerCfgNode a, TimerCfgNode b, int ts
+where noSharedReachable(a, b, ts)
+select a, "Shared timestamp $@ but this node reaches $@", a.getTimestampExpr(ts), ts.toString(), b,
+  b.getNode().toString()

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NewCfgStrictForward.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/**
+ * New-CFG version of StrictForward.
+ *
+ * Original:
+ * Stronger version of NoBackwardFlow: for consecutive annotated nodes
+ * A -> B that both have a single timestamp (non-loop code) and B does
+ * NOT dominate A (forward edge), requires max(A) < min(B).
+ */
+
+import python
+import TimerUtils
+import NewCfgImpl
+
+private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<NewCfg>;
+
+private import Utils
+private import Utils::CfgTests
+
+from TimerCfgNode a, TimerCfgNode b, int maxA, int minB
+where strictForward(a, b, maxA, minB)
+select a, "Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@", a.getTimestampExpr(maxA), "timestamp " + maxA,
+  b.getTimestampExpr(minB), "timestamp " + minB

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NoBackwardFlow.expected

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 | test_boolean.py:9:10:9:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:9:59:9:59 | IntegerLiteral | 2 | test_boolean.py:9:10:9:13 | ControlFlowNode for True | True | test_boolean.py:9:19:9:19 | IntegerLiteral | 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:15:10:15:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:15:50:15:50 | IntegerLiteral | 1 | test_boolean.py:15:10:15:14 | ControlFlowNode for False | False | test_boolean.py:15:20:15:20 | IntegerLiteral | 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:21:10:21:42 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:21:49:21:49 | IntegerLiteral | 1 | test_boolean.py:21:10:21:13 | ControlFlowNode for True | True | test_boolean.py:21:19:21:19 | IntegerLiteral | 0 |
-| test_boolean.py:27:10:27:34 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:27:50:27:50 | IntegerLiteral | 2 | test_boolean.py:27:10:27:14 | ControlFlowNode for False | False | test_boolean.py:27:20:27:20 | IntegerLiteral | 0 |
+| test_boolean.py:27:10:27:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:27:59:27:59 | IntegerLiteral | 2 | test_boolean.py:27:10:27:14 | ControlFlowNode for False | False | test_boolean.py:27:20:27:20 | IntegerLiteral | 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:40:10:40:61 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:40:86:40:86 | IntegerLiteral | 3 | test_boolean.py:40:10:40:10 | ControlFlowNode for IntegerLiteral | IntegerLiteral | test_boolean.py:40:16:40:16 | IntegerLiteral | 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:46:10:46:61 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:46:86:46:86 | IntegerLiteral | 3 | test_boolean.py:46:10:46:10 | ControlFlowNode for IntegerLiteral | IntegerLiteral | test_boolean.py:46:16:46:16 | IntegerLiteral | 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:52:10:52:95 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Backward flow: $@ flows to $@ (max timestamp $@) | test_boolean.py:52:120:52:120 | IntegerLiteral | 4 | test_boolean.py:52:11:52:47 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | BoolExpr | test_boolean.py:52:63:52:63 | IntegerLiteral | 2 |

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NoBackwardFlow.ql

@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
  * exist timestamps a in A and b in B with a < b.
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NoBasicBlock.ql

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
  * Checks that every annotated CFG node belongs to a basic block.
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/NoSharedReachable.ql

@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
  * mutually exclusive CFG paths (neither can reach the other).
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/OldCfgImpl.qll

@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@
  * Python control flow graph.
  */
 
-private import python as PY
+private import python as Py
 import TimerUtils
 
 /** Existing Python CFG implementation of the evaluation-order signature. */
 module OldCfg implements EvalOrderCfgSig {
-  class CfgNode = PY::ControlFlowNode;
+  class CfgNode = Py::ControlFlowNode;
 
-  class BasicBlock = PY::BasicBlock;
+  class BasicBlock = Py::BasicBlock;
 
-  CfgNode scopeGetEntryNode(PY::Scope s) { result = s.getEntryNode() }
+  CfgNode scopeGetEntryNode(Py::Scope s) { result = s.getEntryNode() }
 }

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/StrictForward.expected

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 | test_boolean.py:9:10:9:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:9:59:9:59 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 2 | test_boolean.py:9:19:9:19 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:15:10:15:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:15:50:15:50 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 1 | test_boolean.py:15:20:15:20 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:21:10:21:42 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:21:49:21:49 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 1 | test_boolean.py:21:19:21:19 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
-| test_boolean.py:27:10:27:34 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:27:50:27:50 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 2 | test_boolean.py:27:20:27:20 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
+| test_boolean.py:27:10:27:43 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:27:59:27:59 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 2 | test_boolean.py:27:20:27:20 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:40:10:40:61 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:40:86:40:86 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 3 | test_boolean.py:40:16:40:16 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:46:10:46:61 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:46:86:46:86 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 3 | test_boolean.py:46:16:46:16 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 0 |
 | test_boolean.py:52:10:52:95 | ControlFlowNode for BoolExpr | Strict forward violation: $@ flows to $@ | test_boolean.py:52:120:52:120 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 4 | test_boolean.py:52:63:52:63 | IntegerLiteral | timestamp 2 |

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/StrictForward.ql

@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
  * NOT dominate A (forward edge), requires max(A) < min(B).
  */
 
+import python
+import TimerUtils
 import OldCfgImpl
 
 private module Utils = EvalOrderCfgUtils<OldCfg>;

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/test_boolean.py

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def test_or_short_circuit(t):
 @test
 def test_or_both_sides(t):
     # False or X — both operands evaluated, result is X
-    x = (False @ t[0] or 42 @ t[1]) @ t[dead(1), 2]
+    x = (False @ t[0] or 42 @ t[1, dead(2)]) @ t[dead(1), 2]
 
 
 @test

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/evaluation-order/test_if.py

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ def test_nested_if_else(t):
         else:
             z = 2 @ t[dead(4)]
     else:
-        z = 3 @ t[dead(4)]
+        z = 3 @ t[dead(3), dead(4)]
     w = 0 @ t[5]
 
 

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/store-load/StoreLoadTest.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/**
+ * Inline-expectations test for the store/load/delete/parameter
+ * classification predicates on the new-CFG facade.
+ *
+ * Each tag fires when the corresponding predicate (`isLoad`,
+ * `isStore`, `isDelete`, `isParameter`, `isAugLoad`, `isAugStore`)
+ * holds on the canonical CFG node wrapping a `Py::Name` with the
+ * given identifier. Subscript and attribute stores are not covered
+ * by these tags — only the `Name`-typed targets/loads they involve.
+ */
+
+import python
+import semmle.python.controlflow.internal.Cfg as Cfg
+import utils.test.InlineExpectationsTest
+
+module StoreLoadTest implements TestSig {
+  string getARelevantTag() { result = ["load", "store", "delete", "param", "augload", "augstore"] }
+
+  predicate hasActualResult(Location location, string element, string tag, string value) {
+    exists(Cfg::NameNode n |
+      location = n.getLocation() and
+      element = n.toString() and
+      value = n.getId() and
+      (
+        n.isLoad() and not n.isAugLoad() and tag = "load"
+        or
+        n.isStore() and not n.isAugStore() and tag = "store"
+        or
+        n.isDelete() and tag = "delete"
+        or
+        n.isParameter() and tag = "param"
+        or
+        n.isAugLoad() and tag = "augload"
+        or
+        n.isAugStore() and tag = "augstore"
+      )
+    )
+  }
+}
+
+import MakeTest<StoreLoadTest>

python/ql/test/library-tests/ControlFlow/store-load/test.py

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+# Store/load/delete/parameter classification on the new-CFG facade.
+#
+# Each annotated location carries the (sorted, deduplicated) set of
+# kinds the CFG facade reports there. Comparing against the legacy
+# 'semmle.python.Flow' classification is done by the comparison query
+# 'StoreLoadParity.ql' — annotations here are only the positive
+# assertions for the new facade.
+#
+# Tags:
+#   load=<id>       -- isLoad() fires on the Name
+#   store=<id>      -- isStore() fires
+#   delete=<id>     -- isDelete() fires
+#   param=<id>      -- isParameter() fires
+#   augload=<id>    -- isAugLoad() fires (the LHS of x += ... when read)
+#   augstore=<id>   -- isAugStore() fires (the LHS of x += ... when written)
+
+
+# --- plain load / store / delete ---
+
+x = 1  # $ store=x
+y = x + 1  # $ store=y load=x
+print(y)  # $ load=print load=y
+del x  # $ delete=x
+
+
+# --- function definitions (parameters) ---
+
+def f(a, b=2, *args, c, **kwargs):  # $ store=f param=a param=b param=args param=c param=kwargs
+    return a + b + c  # $ load=a load=b load=c
+
+
+# --- augmented assignment splits one Name into load + store halves ---
+
+def aug():  # $ store=aug
+    n = 0  # $ store=n
+    n += 1  # $ augload=n augstore=n
+    return n  # $ load=n
+
+
+# --- subscript / attribute stores ---
+
+class C:  # $ store=C
+    pass
+
+
+def stores(obj, container, idx):  # $ store=stores param=obj param=container param=idx
+    obj.attr = 1  # $ load=obj
+    container[idx] = 2  # $ load=container load=idx
+    return obj  # $ load=obj
+
+
+# --- tuple unpacking ---
+
+def unpack(pair):  # $ store=unpack param=pair
+    a, b = pair  # $ store=a store=b load=pair
+    return a + b  # $ load=a load=b