From bed1ec89816dacf1fddc92afb1d09b38fd4a1363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Smowton Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 12:10:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Enhance path validation recommendations Expanded recommendations for validating user input when constructing file paths, including normalization and using allowlists. --- .../src/Security/CWE-022/PathInjection.qhelp | 25 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/python/ql/src/Security/CWE-022/PathInjection.qhelp b/python/ql/src/Security/CWE-022/PathInjection.qhelp index ed12b74b6d9..ebe267a462c 100644 --- a/python/ql/src/Security/CWE-022/PathInjection.qhelp +++ b/python/ql/src/Security/CWE-022/PathInjection.qhelp @@ -13,21 +13,26 @@ attacker being able to influence behavior by modifying unexpected files.

-Validate user input before using it to construct a file path, either using an off-the-shelf library function -like werkzeug.utils.secure_filename, or by performing custom validation. +Validate paths constructed from untrusted user input before using them to access files.

-Ideally, follow these rules: +The choice of validation depends on the use case.

- +

+If you want to allow paths spanning multiple folders, a common strategy is to make sure that the constructed +file path is contained within a safe root folder. First, normalize the path using os.path.normpath or +os.path.realpath to remove any ".." segments. Then check that the normalized path starts with the +root folder. Note that the normalization step is important, since otherwise even a path that starts with the root +folder could be used to access files outside the root folder. +

+ +

+More restrictive options include using a library function like werkzeug.utils.secure_filename to eliminate +any special characters from the file path, or restricting the path to an allow list of safe paths. These options are +safe, but can only be used in particular circumstances. +