QL code and tests for C#/C++/JavaScript.

This commit is contained in:
Pavel Avgustinov
2018-08-02 17:53:23 +01:00
commit b55526aa58
10684 changed files with 581163 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
/**
* @name Wrong use of 'this' for static method
* @description A reference to a static method from within an instance method needs to be qualified with the class name, not `this`.
* @kind problem
* @problem.severity error
* @id js/mixed-static-instance-this-access
* @tags correctness
* methods
* @precision high
*/
import javascript
/**
* Holds if `access` is in`fromMethod`, and it references `toMethod` through `this`.
*/
predicate isLocalMethodAccess(PropAccess access, MethodDefinition fromMethod, MethodDefinition toMethod) {
fromMethod.getDeclaringClass() = toMethod.getDeclaringClass() and
access.getEnclosingFunction() = fromMethod.getBody() and
access.getBase() instanceof ThisExpr and
access.getPropertyName() = toMethod.getName()
}
string getKind(MethodDefinition m) {
if m.isStatic() then result = "static" else result = "instance"
}
from PropAccess access, MethodDefinition fromMethod, MethodDefinition toMethod, string fromKind, string toKind
where
isLocalMethodAccess(access, fromMethod, toMethod) and
fromKind = getKind(fromMethod) and
toKind = getKind(toMethod) and
toKind != fromKind and
not toKind = fromKind and
// exceptions
not (
// the class has a second member with the same name and the right kind
exists (MethodDefinition toMethodWithSameKind |
isLocalMethodAccess(access, fromMethod, toMethodWithSameKind) and
fromKind = getKind(toMethodWithSameKind)
)
or
// there is a dynamically assigned second member with the same name and the right kind
exists (AnalyzedPropertyWrite apw, AbstractClass declaringClass, AbstractValue base |
"static" = fromKind and base = declaringClass or
"instance" = fromKind and base = TAbstractInstance(declaringClass) |
declaringClass = TAbstractClass(fromMethod.getDeclaringClass()) and
apw.writes(base, access.getPropertyName(), _)
)
or
// the access is an assignment, probably deliberate
access instanceof LValue
)
select access, "Access to " + toKind + " method $@ from " + fromKind + " method $@ is not possible through `this`.", toMethod, toMethod.getName(), fromMethod, fromMethod.getName()