C++: Fix false positive by adding another allow-list pattern in AssignWhereCompareMeant.

This commit is contained in:
Mathias Vorreiter Pedersen
2021-04-06 11:01:38 +02:00
parent 7045597139
commit a5f4d43d61
3 changed files with 20 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ class BooleanControllingAssignmentInExpr extends BooleanControllingAssignment {
override predicate isWhitelisted() {
this.getConversion().(ParenthesisExpr).isParenthesised()
or
// whitelist this assignment if all comparison operations in the expression that this
// Allow this assignment if all comparison operations in the expression that this
// assignment is part of, are not parenthesized. In that case it seems like programmer
// is fine with unparenthesized comparison operands to binary logical operators, and
// the parenthesis around this assignment was used to call it out as an assignment.
@@ -62,6 +62,21 @@ class BooleanControllingAssignmentInExpr extends BooleanControllingAssignment {
forex(ComparisonOperation op | op = getComparisonOperand*(this.getParent+()) |
not op.isParenthesised()
)
or
// Match a pattern like:
// ```
// if((a = b) && use_value(a)) { ... }
// ```
// where the assignment is meant to update the value of `a` before it's used in some other boolean
// subexpression that is guarenteed to be evaluate _after_ the assignment.
this.isParenthesised() and
exists(LogicalAndExpr parent, Variable var, VariableAccess access |
var = this.getLValue().(VariableAccess).getTarget() and
access = var.getAnAccess() and
not access.isUsedAsLValue() and
parent.getRightOperand() = access.getParent*() and
parent.getLeftOperand() = this.getParent*()
)
}
}

View File

@@ -19,10 +19,6 @@
| test.cpp:144:32:144:36 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:150:32:150:36 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:153:46:153:50 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:160:7:160:12 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:162:7:162:12 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:163:7:163:12 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:164:7:164:12 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:166:22:166:27 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:168:24:168:29 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |
| test.cpp:169:23:169:28 | ... = ... | Use of '=' where '==' may have been intended. |

View File

@@ -157,11 +157,11 @@ void f3(int x, int y) {
bool use(int);
void f4(int x, bool b) {
if((x = 10) && use(x)) {} // GOOD [FALSE POSITIVE]: This is likely just a short-hand way of writing an assignment
if((x = 10) && use(x)) {} // GOOD: This is likely just a short-hand way of writing an assignment
// followed by a boolean check.
if((x = 10) && b && use(x)) {} // GOOD [FALSE POSITIVE]: Same reason as above
if((x = 10) && use(x) && b) {} // GOOD [FALSE POSITIVE]: Same reason as above
if((x = 10) && (use(x) && b)) {} // GOOD [FALSE POSITIVE]: Same reason as above
if((x = 10) && b && use(x)) {} // GOOD: Same reason as above
if((x = 10) && use(x) && b) {} // GOOD: Same reason as above
if((x = 10) && (use(x) && b)) {} // GOOD: Same reason as above
if(use(x) && b && (x = 10)) {} // BAD: The assignment is the last thing that happens in the comparison.
// This doesn't match the usual pattern.