mirror of
https://github.com/github/codeql.git
synced 2026-05-04 13:15:21 +02:00
less heuristics when flagging division that is rounded
This commit is contained in:
@@ -13,5 +13,3 @@
|
||||
| bad-random.js:85:11:85:35 | goodRan ... Random2 | Using addition on a $@ produces biased results. | bad-random.js:84:23:84:38 | secureRandom(10) | cryptographically secure random number |
|
||||
| bad-random.js:87:16:87:24 | bad + bad | Using addition on a $@ produces biased results. | bad-random.js:83:23:83:38 | secureRandom(10) | cryptographically secure random number |
|
||||
| bad-random.js:87:16:87:24 | bad + bad | Using addition on a $@ produces biased results. | bad-random.js:84:23:84:38 | secureRandom(10) | cryptographically secure random number |
|
||||
| bad-random.js:90:29:90:54 | secureR ... / 25.6 | Using division and rounding the result on a $@ produces biased results. | bad-random.js:90:29:90:44 | secureRandom(10) | cryptographically secure random number |
|
||||
| bad-random.js:96:29:96:58 | crypto. ... ] / 100 | Using division and rounding the result on a $@ produces biased results. | bad-random.js:96:29:96:49 | crypto. ... ytes(1) | cryptographically secure random number |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ var bad = goodRandom1 + goodRandom2; // NOT OK
|
||||
var dontFlag = bad + bad; // OK - the operands have already been flagged - but flagged anyway due to us not detecting that [INCONSISTENCY].
|
||||
|
||||
var good = secureRandom(10)[0] / 0xff; // OK - result is not rounded.
|
||||
var good = Math.ceil(0.5 - (secureRandom(10)[0] / 25.6)); // NOT OK - division generally introduces bias.
|
||||
var good = Math.ceil(0.5 - (secureRandom(10)[0] / 25.6)); // NOT OK - division generally introduces bias - but not flagged due to not looking through nested arithmetic [INCONSISTENCY].
|
||||
|
||||
var good = (crypto.randomBytes(1)[0] << 8) + crypto.randomBytes(3)[0]; // OK - bit shifts are usually used to construct larger/smaller numbers,
|
||||
|
||||
var good = Math.floor(max * (crypto.randomBytes(1)[0] / 0xff)); // OK - division by 0xff (255) gives a uniformly random number between 0 and 1.
|
||||
|
||||
var bad = Math.floor(max * (crypto.randomBytes(1)[0] / 100)); // NOT OK - division by 100 gives bias.
|
||||
var bad = Math.floor(max * (crypto.randomBytes(1)[0] / 100)); // NOT OK - division by 100 gives bias - but not flagged due to not looking through nested arithmetic [INCONSISTENCY].
|
||||
|
||||
var crb = crypto.randomBytes(4);
|
||||
var cryptoRand = 0x01000000 * crb[0] + 0x00010000 * crb[1] + 0x00000100 * crb[2] + 0x00000001 * crb[3]; // OK - producing a larger number from smaller numbers.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user