mirror of
https://github.com/github/codeql.git
synced 2026-04-26 17:25:19 +02:00
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
import javascript
|
||||
import semmle.javascript.security.performance.SuperlinearBackTracking
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This query implements the analysis described in the following two papers:
|
||||
@@ -43,9 +44,10 @@ import javascript
|
||||
* condition is equivalent to saying that `(q, q)` is reachable from `(r1, r2)`
|
||||
* in the product NFA.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is what the query does. It makes no attempt to construct a prefix
|
||||
* leading into `q`, and only a weak one to construct a suffix that ensures
|
||||
* rejection; this causes some false positives.
|
||||
* This is what the query does. It makes a simple attempt to construct a
|
||||
* prefix `v` leading into `q`, but only to improve the alert message.
|
||||
* And the query tries to prove the existence of a suffix that ensures
|
||||
* rejection. This check might fail, which can cause false positives.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Finally, sometimes it depends on the translation whether the NFA generated
|
||||
* for a regular expression has a pumpable fork or not. We implement one
|
||||
@@ -57,7 +59,9 @@ import javascript
|
||||
*
|
||||
* * Every sub-term `t` gives rise to an NFA state `Match(t,i)`, representing
|
||||
* the state of the automaton before attempting to match the `i`th character in `t`.
|
||||
* * There is one additional accepting state `Accept(r)`.
|
||||
* * There is one accepting state `Accept(r)`.
|
||||
* * There is a special `AcceptAnySuffix(r)` state, which accepts any suffix string
|
||||
* by using an epsilon transition to `Accept(r)` and an any transition to itself.
|
||||
* * Transitions between states may be labelled with epsilon, or an abstract
|
||||
* input symbol.
|
||||
* * Each abstract input symbol represents a set of concrete input characters:
|
||||
@@ -71,13 +75,8 @@ import javascript
|
||||
* * Once a trace of pairs of abstract input symbols that leads from a fork
|
||||
* back to itself has been identified, we attempt to construct a concrete
|
||||
* string corresponding to it, which may fail.
|
||||
* * Instead of trying to construct a suffix that makes the automaton fail,
|
||||
* we ensure that repeating `n` copies of `w` does not reach a state that is
|
||||
* an epsilon transition from the accepting state.
|
||||
* This assumes that the accepting state accepts any suffix.
|
||||
* Regular expressions - where the end anchor `$` is used - have an accepting state
|
||||
* that does not accept all suffixes. Such regular expression not accurately
|
||||
* modelled by this assumption, which can cause false negatives.
|
||||
* * Lastly we ensure that any state reached by repeating `n` copies of `w` has
|
||||
* a suffix `x` (possible empty) that is most likely __not__ accepted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -104,15 +103,7 @@ class RegExpRoot extends RegExpTerm {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate isRelevant() {
|
||||
// there is at least one repetition
|
||||
exists(RegExpRepetition rep | getRoot(rep) = this |
|
||||
// that could possibly match the same thing in multiple ways.
|
||||
exists(RegExpTerm child |
|
||||
child instanceof RegExpAlt or
|
||||
child instanceof RegExpQuantifier
|
||||
|
|
||||
child.getParent+() = rep
|
||||
)
|
||||
) and
|
||||
exists(MaybeBacktrackingRepetition rep | getRoot(rep) = this) and
|
||||
// there are no lookbehinds
|
||||
not exists(RegExpLookbehind lbh | getRoot(lbh) = this) and
|
||||
// is actually used as a RegExp
|
||||
@@ -121,13 +112,16 @@ class RegExpRoot extends RegExpTerm {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A term that matches repetitions of a given pattern, that is, `E*`, `E+`, or `E{n,m}`.
|
||||
* A infinitely repeating quantifier that might backtrack.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
class RegExpRepetition extends RegExpParent {
|
||||
RegExpRepetition() {
|
||||
this instanceof RegExpStar or
|
||||
this instanceof RegExpPlus or
|
||||
this instanceof RegExpRange
|
||||
class MaybeBacktrackingRepetition extends InfiniteRepetitionQuantifier {
|
||||
MaybeBacktrackingRepetition() {
|
||||
exists(RegExpTerm child |
|
||||
child instanceof RegExpAlt or
|
||||
child instanceof RegExpQuantifier
|
||||
|
|
||||
child.getParent+() = this
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -164,9 +158,9 @@ newtype TInputSymbol =
|
||||
(
|
||||
recc instanceof RegExpCharacterClass and
|
||||
not recc.(RegExpCharacterClass).isUniversalClass()
|
||||
or
|
||||
recc instanceof RegExpCharacterClassEscape
|
||||
)
|
||||
or
|
||||
recc instanceof RegExpCharacterClassEscape
|
||||
} or
|
||||
/** An input symbol representing all characters matched by `.`. */
|
||||
Dot() or
|
||||
@@ -460,29 +454,43 @@ newtype TState =
|
||||
exists(t.(RegexpCharacterConstant).getValue().charAt(i))
|
||||
)
|
||||
} or
|
||||
Accept(RegExpRoot l) { l.isRelevant() }
|
||||
Accept(RegExpRoot l) { l.isRelevant() } or
|
||||
AcceptAnySuffix(RegExpRoot l) { l.isRelevant() }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A state in the NFA corresponding to a regular expression.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Each regular expression literal `l` has one accepting state
|
||||
* `Accept(l)` and a state `Match(t, i)` for every subterm `t`,
|
||||
* `Accept(l)`, one state that accepts all suffixes `AcceptAnySuffix(l)`,
|
||||
* and a state `Match(t, i)` for every subterm `t`,
|
||||
* which represents the state of the NFA before starting to
|
||||
* match `t`, or the `i`th character in `t` if `t` is a constant.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
class State extends TState {
|
||||
RegExpParent repr;
|
||||
RegExpTerm repr;
|
||||
|
||||
State() { this = Match(repr, _) or this = Accept(repr) }
|
||||
State() {
|
||||
this = Match(repr, _) or
|
||||
this = Accept(repr) or
|
||||
this = AcceptAnySuffix(repr)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
string toString() {
|
||||
exists(int i | this = Match(repr, i) | result = "Match(" + repr + "," + i + ")")
|
||||
or
|
||||
this instanceof Accept and
|
||||
result = "Accept(" + repr + ")"
|
||||
or
|
||||
this instanceof AcceptAnySuffix and
|
||||
result = "AcceptAny(" + repr + ")"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Location getLocation() { result = repr.getLocation() }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets the term represented by this state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
RegExpTerm getRepr() { result = repr }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
class EdgeLabel extends TInputSymbol {
|
||||
@@ -522,7 +530,7 @@ State after(RegExpTerm t) {
|
||||
or
|
||||
exists(RegExpOpt opt | t = opt.getAChild() | result = after(opt))
|
||||
or
|
||||
exists(RegExpRoot root | t = root | result = Accept(root))
|
||||
exists(RegExpRoot root | t = root | result = AcceptAnySuffix(root))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -577,6 +585,16 @@ predicate delta(State q1, EdgeLabel lbl, State q2) {
|
||||
or
|
||||
q1 = before(opt) and q2 = after(opt)
|
||||
)
|
||||
or
|
||||
exists(RegExpRoot root | q1 = AcceptAnySuffix(root) |
|
||||
lbl = Any() and q2 = q1
|
||||
or
|
||||
lbl = Epsilon() and q2 = Accept(root)
|
||||
)
|
||||
or
|
||||
exists(RegExpDollar dollar | q1 = before(dollar) |
|
||||
lbl = Epsilon() and q2 = Accept(getRoot(dollar))
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -596,6 +614,14 @@ State epsilonPred(State q) { q = epsilonSucc(result) }
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate deltaClosed(State q1, InputSymbol s, State q2) { delta(epsilonSucc*(q1), s, q2) }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if state `s` might be inside a backtracking repetition.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pragma[noinline]
|
||||
predicate stateInsideBacktracking(State s) {
|
||||
s.getRepr().getParent*() instanceof MaybeBacktrackingRepetition
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A state in the product automaton.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@@ -605,12 +631,16 @@ predicate deltaClosed(State q1, InputSymbol s, State q2) { delta(epsilonSucc*(q1
|
||||
* already constructed. To cut down on the number of states,
|
||||
* we only represent states `(q1, q2)` where `q1` is lexicographically
|
||||
* no bigger than `q2`.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* States are only constructed if both states in the pair are
|
||||
* inside a repetition that might backtrack.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
newtype TStatePair =
|
||||
MkStatePair(State q1, State q2) {
|
||||
isFork(q1, _, _, _, _) and q2 = q1
|
||||
or
|
||||
step(_, _, _, q1, q2) and q1.toString() <= q2.toString()
|
||||
step(_, _, _, q1, q2) and
|
||||
q1.toString() <= q2.toString()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
class StatePair extends TStatePair {
|
||||
@@ -656,6 +686,7 @@ int statePairDist(StatePair q, StatePair r) =
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pragma[noopt]
|
||||
predicate isFork(State q, InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, State r1, State r2) {
|
||||
stateInsideBacktracking(q) and
|
||||
exists(State q1, State q2 |
|
||||
q1 = epsilonSucc*(q) and
|
||||
delta(q1, s1, r1) and
|
||||
@@ -671,7 +702,9 @@ predicate isFork(State q, InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, State r1, State r2) {
|
||||
r1 != r2
|
||||
or
|
||||
r1 = r2 and q1 != q2
|
||||
)
|
||||
) and
|
||||
stateInsideBacktracking(r1) and
|
||||
stateInsideBacktracking(r2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -685,6 +718,9 @@ predicate step(StatePair q, InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, StatePair r) {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if there are transitions from the components of `q` to `r1` and `r2`
|
||||
* labelled with `s1` and `s2`, respectively.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We only consider transitions where the resulting states `(r1, r2)` are both
|
||||
* inside a repetition that might backtrack.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pragma[noopt]
|
||||
predicate step(StatePair q, InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, State r1, State r2) {
|
||||
@@ -693,16 +729,14 @@ predicate step(StatePair q, InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, State r1, State r2)
|
||||
deltaClosed(q2, s2, r2) and
|
||||
// use noopt to force the join on `intersect` to happen last.
|
||||
exists(intersect(s1, s2))
|
||||
)
|
||||
) and
|
||||
stateInsideBacktracking(r1) and
|
||||
stateInsideBacktracking(r2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A list of pairs of input symbols that describe a path in the product automaton
|
||||
* starting from some fork state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
newtype Trace =
|
||||
private newtype TTrace =
|
||||
Nil() or
|
||||
Step(InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, Trace t) {
|
||||
Step(InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, TTrace t) {
|
||||
exists(StatePair p |
|
||||
isReachableFromFork(_, p, t, _) and
|
||||
step(p, s1, s2, _)
|
||||
@@ -711,6 +745,20 @@ newtype Trace =
|
||||
t = Nil() and isFork(_, s1, s2, _, _)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A list of pairs of input symbols that describe a path in the product automaton
|
||||
* starting from some fork state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
class Trace extends TTrace {
|
||||
string toString() {
|
||||
this = Nil() and result = "Nil()"
|
||||
or
|
||||
exists(InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2, Trace t | this = Step(s1, s2, t) |
|
||||
result = "Step(" + s1 + ", " + s2 + ", " + t + ")"
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets the minimum char that is matched by both the character classes `c` and `d`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -849,46 +897,241 @@ StatePair getAForkPair(State fork) {
|
||||
predicate isPumpable(State fork, string w) {
|
||||
exists(StatePair q, Trace t |
|
||||
isReachableFromFork(fork, q, t, _) and
|
||||
(
|
||||
q = getAForkPair(fork) and w = concretise(t)
|
||||
or
|
||||
exists(InputSymbol s1, InputSymbol s2 |
|
||||
step(q, s1, s2, getAForkPair(fork)) and
|
||||
w = concretise(Step(s1, s2, t))
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
q = getAForkPair(fork) and
|
||||
w = concretise(t)
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets a state that can be reached from pumpable `fork` consuming all
|
||||
* chars in `w` any number of times followed by the first `i+1` characters of `w`.
|
||||
* Predicates for constructing a prefix string that leads to a given state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
module PrefixConstruction {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if `state` starts the string matched by the regular expression.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private predicate isStartState(State state) {
|
||||
state instanceof StateInPumpableRegexp and
|
||||
(
|
||||
state = Match(any(RegExpRoot r), _)
|
||||
or
|
||||
exists(RegExpCaret car | state = after(car))
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if `state` is the textually last start state for the regular expression.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private predicate lastStartState(State state) {
|
||||
exists(RegExpRoot root |
|
||||
state =
|
||||
max(State s, Location l |
|
||||
isStartState(s) and getRoot(s.getRepr()) = root and l = s.getRepr().getLocation()
|
||||
|
|
||||
s order by l.getStartLine(), l.getStartColumn()
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if there exists any transition (Epsilon() or other) from `a` to `b`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private predicate existsTransition(State a, State b) { delta(a, _, b) }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets the minimum number of transitions it takes to reach `state` from the `start` state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int prefixLength(State start, State state) =
|
||||
shortestDistances(lastStartState/1, existsTransition/2)(start, state, result)
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets the minimum number of transitions it takes to reach `state` from the start state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private int lengthFromStart(State state) { result = prefixLength(_, state) }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets a string for which the regular expression will reach `state`.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Has at most one result for any given `state`.
|
||||
* This predicate will not always have a result even if there is a ReDoS issue in
|
||||
* the regular expression.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
string prefix(State state) {
|
||||
lastStartState(state) and
|
||||
result = ""
|
||||
or
|
||||
// the search stops past the last redos candidate state.
|
||||
lengthFromStart(state) <= max(lengthFromStart(any(State s | isReDoSCandidate(s, _)))) and
|
||||
exists(State prev |
|
||||
// select a unique predecessor (by an arbitrary measure)
|
||||
prev =
|
||||
min(State s, Location loc |
|
||||
lengthFromStart(s) = lengthFromStart(state) - 1 and
|
||||
loc = s.getRepr().getLocation() and
|
||||
delta(s, _, state)
|
||||
|
|
||||
s order by loc.getStartLine(), loc.getStartColumn(), loc.getEndLine(), loc.getEndColumn()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
||||
// greedy search for the shortest prefix
|
||||
result = prefix(prev) and delta(prev, Epsilon(), state)
|
||||
or
|
||||
not delta(prev, Epsilon(), state) and
|
||||
result =
|
||||
prefix(prev) +
|
||||
min(string c | delta(prev, any(InputSymbol symbol | c = intersect(Any(), symbol)), state))
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A state within a regular expression that has a pumpable state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
class StateInPumpableRegexp extends State {
|
||||
pragma[noinline]
|
||||
StateInPumpableRegexp() {
|
||||
exists(State s | isReDoSCandidate(s, _) | getRoot(s.getRepr()) = getRoot(this.getRepr()))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Predicates for testing the presence of a rejecting suffix.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This predicate is used to ensure that the accepting state is not reached from the fork by repeating `w`.
|
||||
* This works under the assumption that any accepting state accepts all suffixes.
|
||||
* For example, a regexp like `/^(a+)+/` will accept any string as long the prefix is some number of `"a"`s,
|
||||
* and it is therefore not possible to construct a rejected suffix.
|
||||
* This assumption breaks on regular expression that use the anchor `$`, e.g: `/^(a+)+$/`, and such regular
|
||||
* expression are not accurately modeled by this query.
|
||||
* These predicates are used to ensure that the all states reached from the fork
|
||||
* by repeating `w` have a rejecting suffix.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For example, a regexp like `/^(a+)+/` will accept any string as long the prefix is
|
||||
* some number of `"a"`s, and it is therefore not possible to construct a rejecting suffix.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A regexp like `/(a+)+$/` or `/(a+)+b/` trivially has a rejecting suffix,
|
||||
* as the suffix "X" will cause both the regular expressions to be rejected.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The string `w` is repeated any number of times because it needs to be
|
||||
* infinitely repeatedable for the attack to work.
|
||||
* For a regular expression `/((ab)+)*abab/` the accepting state is not reachable from the fork
|
||||
* using epsilon transitions. But any attempt at repeating `w` will end in the accepting state.
|
||||
* This also relies on the assumption that any accepting state will accept all suffixes.
|
||||
* For the regular expression `/((ab)+)*abab/` the accepting state is not reachable from the fork
|
||||
* using epsilon transitions. But any attempt at repeating `w` will end in a state that accepts all suffixes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
State process(State fork, string w, int i) {
|
||||
isPumpable(fork, w) and
|
||||
exists(State prev |
|
||||
i = 0 and prev = fork
|
||||
module SuffixConstruction {
|
||||
import PrefixConstruction
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if all states reachable from `fork` by repeating `w`
|
||||
* are likely rejectable by appending some suffix.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate reachesOnlyRejectableSuffixes(State fork, string w) {
|
||||
isReDoSCandidate(fork, w) and
|
||||
forex(State next | next = process(fork, w, w.length() - 1) | isLikelyRejectable(next))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if there likely exists a suffix starting from `s` that leads to the regular expression being rejected.
|
||||
* This predicate might find impossible suffixes when searching for suffixes of length > 1, which can cause FPs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pragma[nomagic]
|
||||
private predicate isLikelyRejectable(StateInPumpableRegexp s) {
|
||||
// exists a reject edge with some char.
|
||||
hasRejectEdge(s)
|
||||
or
|
||||
prev = process(fork, w, i - 1)
|
||||
hasEdgeToLikelyRejectable(s)
|
||||
or
|
||||
// repeat until fixpoint
|
||||
i = 0 and
|
||||
prev = process(fork, w, w.length() - 1)
|
||||
|
|
||||
deltaClosed(prev, getAnInputSymbolMatching(w.charAt(i)), result)
|
||||
// stopping here is rejection
|
||||
isRejectState(s)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if `s` is not an accept state, and there is no epsilon transition to an accept state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate isRejectState(StateInPumpableRegexp s) { not epsilonSucc*(s) = Accept(_) }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if there is likely a non-empty suffix leading to rejection starting in `s`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate hasEdgeToLikelyRejectable(StateInPumpableRegexp s) {
|
||||
// all edges (at least one) with some char leads to another state that is rejectable.
|
||||
// the `next` states might not share a common suffix, which can cause FPs.
|
||||
exists(string char | char = relevant() |
|
||||
forex(State next | deltaClosedChar(s, char, next) | isLikelyRejectable(next))
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if there is a state `next` that can be reached from `prev`
|
||||
* along epsilon edges, such that there is a transition from
|
||||
* `prev` to `next` that the character symbol `char`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate deltaClosedChar(StateInPumpableRegexp prev, string char, StateInPumpableRegexp next) {
|
||||
char = relevant() and
|
||||
deltaClosed(prev, getAnInputSymbolMatching(char), next)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets a char used for finding possible suffixes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private string relevant() { result = CharacterClasses::getARelevantChar() }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if there is no edge from `s` labeled `char` in our NFA.
|
||||
* The NFA does not model reject states, so the above is the same as saying there is a reject edge.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private predicate hasRejectEdge(State s) {
|
||||
exists(string char | char = relevant() | not deltaClosedChar(s, char, _))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets a state that can be reached from pumpable `fork` consuming all
|
||||
* chars in `w` any number of times followed by the first `i+1` characters of `w`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private State process(State fork, string w, int i) {
|
||||
isReDoSCandidate(fork, w) and
|
||||
exists(State prev |
|
||||
i = 0 and prev = fork
|
||||
or
|
||||
prev = process(fork, w, i - 1)
|
||||
or
|
||||
// repeat until fixpoint
|
||||
i = 0 and
|
||||
prev = process(fork, w, w.length() - 1)
|
||||
|
|
||||
deltaClosed(prev, getAnInputSymbolMatching(w.charAt(i)), result)
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if `term` may cause exponential backtracking on strings containing many repetitions of `pump`.
|
||||
* Gets the minimum possible string that causes exponential backtracking.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate isReDoSAttackable(RegExpTerm term, string pump, State s) {
|
||||
exists(int i, string c | s = Match(term, i) |
|
||||
c =
|
||||
min(string w |
|
||||
isReDoSCandidate(s, w) and
|
||||
SuffixConstruction::reachesOnlyRejectableSuffixes(s, w)
|
||||
|
|
||||
w order by w.length(), w
|
||||
) and
|
||||
pump = escape(rotate(c, i))
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Holds if repeating `pump' starting at `state` is a candidate for causing exponential backtracking.
|
||||
* No check whether a rejected suffix exists has been made.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
predicate isReDoSCandidate(State state, string pump) {
|
||||
isPumpable(state, pump) and
|
||||
(
|
||||
not isPumpable(epsilonSucc+(state), _)
|
||||
or
|
||||
epsilonSucc+(state) = state and
|
||||
state =
|
||||
max(State s, Location l |
|
||||
s = epsilonSucc+(state) and
|
||||
l = s.getRepr().getLocation() and
|
||||
isPumpable(s, _) and
|
||||
s.getRepr() instanceof InfiniteRepetitionQuantifier
|
||||
|
|
||||
s order by l.getStartLine(), l.getStartColumn(), l.getEndColumn(), l.getEndLine()
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -898,13 +1141,17 @@ State process(State fork, string w, int i) {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bindingset[s]
|
||||
string escape(string s) {
|
||||
result = s.replaceAll("\\", "\\\\").replaceAll("\n", "\\n").replaceAll("\r", "\\r")
|
||||
result =
|
||||
s.replaceAll("\\", "\\\\")
|
||||
.replaceAll("\n", "\\n")
|
||||
.replaceAll("\r", "\\r")
|
||||
.replaceAll("\t", "\\t")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Gets `str` with the last `i` characters moved to the front.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We use this to adjust the witness string to match with the beginning of
|
||||
* We use this to adjust the pump string to match with the beginning of
|
||||
* a RegExpTerm, so it doesn't start in the middle of a constant.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bindingset[str, i]
|
||||
@@ -912,16 +1159,17 @@ string rotate(string str, int i) {
|
||||
result = str.suffix(str.length() - i) + str.prefix(str.length() - i)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
from RegExpTerm t, string c, int i
|
||||
from RegExpTerm t, string pump, State s, string prefixMsg
|
||||
where
|
||||
c =
|
||||
min(string w |
|
||||
isPumpable(Match(t, i), w) and
|
||||
not isPumpable(epsilonSucc+(Match(t, i)), _) and
|
||||
not epsilonSucc*(process(Match(t, i), w, _)) = Accept(_)
|
||||
|
|
||||
w order by w.length(), w
|
||||
)
|
||||
isReDoSAttackable(t, pump, s) and
|
||||
(
|
||||
prefixMsg = "starting with '" + escape(PrefixConstruction::prefix(s)) + "' and " and
|
||||
not PrefixConstruction::prefix(s) = ""
|
||||
or
|
||||
PrefixConstruction::prefix(s) = "" and prefixMsg = ""
|
||||
or
|
||||
not exists(PrefixConstruction::prefix(s)) and prefixMsg = ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
select t,
|
||||
"This part of the regular expression may cause exponential backtracking on strings " +
|
||||
"containing many repetitions of '" + escape(rotate(c, i)) + "'."
|
||||
"This part of the regular expression may cause exponential backtracking on strings " + prefixMsg +
|
||||
"containing many repetitions of '" + pump + "'."
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import javascript
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A regular expression term that permits unlimited repetitions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private class InfiniteRepetitionQuantifier extends RegExpQuantifier {
|
||||
class InfiniteRepetitionQuantifier extends RegExpQuantifier {
|
||||
InfiniteRepetitionQuantifier() {
|
||||
this instanceof RegExpPlus
|
||||
or
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user