mirror of
https://github.com/github/codeql.git
synced 2025-12-21 19:26:31 +01:00
C++: Make PartialDefinitionNode private and add/update comments based on review comments
This commit is contained in:
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ abstract class PostUpdateNode extends InstructionNode {
|
||||
* setY(&x); // a partial definition of the object `x`.
|
||||
* ```
|
||||
*/
|
||||
abstract class PartialDefinitionNode extends PostUpdateNode, TInstructionNode { }
|
||||
abstract private class PartialDefinitionNode extends PostUpdateNode, TInstructionNode { }
|
||||
|
||||
private class ExplicitFieldStoreQualifierNode extends PartialDefinitionNode {
|
||||
override ChiInstruction instr;
|
||||
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ private class ExplicitFieldStoreQualifierNode extends PartialDefinitionNode {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// There might be multiple `ChiInstructions` that has a particular instruction as
|
||||
// the total operand - so this definition give consistency errors in
|
||||
// the total operand - so this definition gives consistency errors in
|
||||
// DataFlowImplConsistency::Consistency. However, it's not clear what (if any) implications
|
||||
// this consistency failure has.
|
||||
override Node getPreUpdateNode() { result.asInstruction() = instr.getTotal() }
|
||||
@@ -430,9 +430,23 @@ private predicate simpleInstructionLocalFlowStep(Instruction iFrom, Instruction
|
||||
// for now.
|
||||
iTo.getAnOperand().(ChiTotalOperand).getDef() = iFrom
|
||||
or
|
||||
// The next two rules allow flow from partial definitions in setters to succeeding loads in the caller.
|
||||
// First, we add flow from write side-effects to non-conflated chi instructions through their
|
||||
// partial operands. Consider the following example:
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// void setX(Point* p, int new_x) {
|
||||
// p->x = new_x;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
// setX(&p, taint());
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// Here, a `WriteSideEffectInstruction` will provide a new definition for `p->x` after the call to
|
||||
// `setX`, which will be melded into `p` through a chi instruction.
|
||||
iTo.getAnOperand().(ChiPartialOperand).getDef() = iFrom.(WriteSideEffectInstruction) and
|
||||
not iTo.isResultConflated()
|
||||
or
|
||||
// Next, we add flow from non-conflated chi instructions to loads (even when they are not precise).
|
||||
// This ensures that loads of `p->x` gets data flow from the `WriteSideEffectInstruction` above.
|
||||
exists(ChiInstruction chi | iFrom = chi |
|
||||
not chi.isResultConflated() and
|
||||
iTo.(LoadInstruction).getSourceValueOperand().getAnyDef() = chi
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -85,14 +85,14 @@ void class_field_test() {
|
||||
|
||||
mc1.myMethod();
|
||||
|
||||
sink(mc1.a); // [FALSE POSITIVE]
|
||||
sink(mc1.b); // tainted
|
||||
sink(mc1.c); // tainted
|
||||
sink(mc1.d); // tainted
|
||||
sink(mc2.a); // [FALSE POSITIVE]
|
||||
sink(mc2.b); // tainted
|
||||
sink(mc2.c); // tainted
|
||||
sink(mc2.d); // [FALSE POSITIVE]
|
||||
sink(mc1.a);
|
||||
sink(mc1.b); // tainted [NOT DETECTED with IR]
|
||||
sink(mc1.c); // tainted [NOT DETECTED with IR]
|
||||
sink(mc1.d); // tainted [NOT DETECTED with IR]
|
||||
sink(mc2.a);
|
||||
sink(mc2.b); // tainted [NOT DETECTED with IR]
|
||||
sink(mc2.c); // tainted [NOT DETECTED with IR]
|
||||
sink(mc2.d);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// --- arrays ---
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user