From 355cb6eeecb08916936b9f32f61734ca8f3f9eea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: intrigus-lgtm <60750685+intrigus-lgtm@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:24:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Qhelp format

Co-authored-by: Felicity Chapman <felicitymay@github.com>
---
 .../src/Security/CWE/CWE-297/UnsafeHostnameVerification.qhelp   | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/java/ql/src/Security/CWE/CWE-297/UnsafeHostnameVerification.qhelp b/java/ql/src/Security/CWE/CWE-297/UnsafeHostnameVerification.qhelp
index f8bfc87a9c3..cca6b6e4a5b 100644
--- a/java/ql/src/Security/CWE/CWE-297/UnsafeHostnameVerification.qhelp
+++ b/java/ql/src/Security/CWE/CWE-297/UnsafeHostnameVerification.qhelp
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ An attack would look like this:
 <recommendation>
 <p>
 Do not use an open <code>HostnameVerifier</code>.
+</p>
 <li>If you use an open verifier to solve a configuration problem with TLS/HTTPS you should solve the configuration problem instead.
 </li>
-</p>
 
 </recommendation>