C++: replace Guards with IRGuards

This commit is contained in:
Robert Marsh
2022-11-21 12:28:18 -05:00
committed by Jeroen Ketema
parent db1dc6fa2c
commit 172445f5e7

View File

@@ -7,371 +7,7 @@ import cpp
import semmle.code.cpp.controlflow.BasicBlocks
import semmle.code.cpp.controlflow.SSA
import semmle.code.cpp.controlflow.Dominance
/**
* A Boolean condition that guards one or more basic blocks. This includes
* operands of logical operators but not switch statements.
*/
class GuardCondition extends Expr {
GuardCondition() { is_condition(this) }
/**
* Holds if this condition controls `block`, meaning that `block` is only
* entered if the value of this condition is `testIsTrue`.
*
* Illustration:
*
* ```
* [ (testIsTrue) ]
* [ this ----------------succ ---- controlled ]
* [ | | ]
* [ (testIsFalse) | ------ ... ]
* [ other ]
* ```
*
* The predicate holds if all paths to `controlled` go via the `testIsTrue`
* edge of the control-flow graph. In other words, the `testIsTrue` edge
* must dominate `controlled`. This means that `controlled` must be
* dominated by both `this` and `succ` (the target of the `testIsTrue`
* edge). It also means that any other edge into `succ` must be a back-edge
* from a node which is dominated by `succ`.
*
* The short-circuit boolean operations have slightly surprising behavior
* here: because the operation itself only dominates one branch (due to
* being short-circuited) then it will only control blocks dominated by the
* true (for `&&`) or false (for `||`) branch.
*/
cached
predicate controls(BasicBlock controlled, boolean testIsTrue) {
// This condition must determine the flow of control; that is, this
// node must be a top-level condition.
this.controlsBlock(controlled, testIsTrue)
or
exists(BinaryLogicalOperation binop, GuardCondition lhs, GuardCondition rhs |
this = binop and
lhs = binop.getLeftOperand() and
rhs = binop.getRightOperand() and
lhs.controls(controlled, testIsTrue) and
rhs.controls(controlled, testIsTrue)
)
or
exists(GuardCondition ne, GuardCondition operand |
this = operand and
operand = ne.(NotExpr).getOperand() and
ne.controls(controlled, testIsTrue.booleanNot())
)
}
/** Holds if (determined by this guard) `left < right + k` evaluates to `isLessThan` if this expression evaluates to `testIsTrue`. */
cached
predicate comparesLt(Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean isLessThan, boolean testIsTrue) {
compares_lt(this, left, right, k, isLessThan, testIsTrue)
}
/**
* Holds if (determined by this guard) `left < right + k` must be `isLessThan` in `block`.
* If `isLessThan = false` then this implies `left >= right + k`.
*/
cached
predicate ensuresLt(Expr left, Expr right, int k, BasicBlock block, boolean isLessThan) {
exists(boolean testIsTrue |
compares_lt(this, left, right, k, isLessThan, testIsTrue) and this.controls(block, testIsTrue)
)
}
/** Holds if (determined by this guard) `left == right + k` evaluates to `areEqual` if this expression evaluates to `testIsTrue`. */
cached
predicate comparesEq(Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean areEqual, boolean testIsTrue) {
compares_eq(this, left, right, k, areEqual, testIsTrue)
}
/**
* Holds if (determined by this guard) `left == right + k` must be `areEqual` in `block`.
* If `areEqual = false` then this implies `left != right + k`.
*/
cached
predicate ensuresEq(Expr left, Expr right, int k, BasicBlock block, boolean areEqual) {
exists(boolean testIsTrue |
compares_eq(this, left, right, k, areEqual, testIsTrue) and this.controls(block, testIsTrue)
)
}
/**
* Holds if this condition controls `block`, meaning that `block` is only
* entered if the value of this condition is `testIsTrue`. This helper
* predicate does not necessarily hold for binary logical operations like
* `&&` and `||`. See the detailed explanation on predicate `controls`.
*/
private predicate controlsBlock(BasicBlock controlled, boolean testIsTrue) {
exists(BasicBlock thisblock | thisblock.contains(this) |
exists(BasicBlock succ |
testIsTrue = true and succ = this.getATrueSuccessor()
or
testIsTrue = false and succ = this.getAFalseSuccessor()
|
bbDominates(succ, controlled) and
forall(BasicBlock pred | pred.getASuccessor() = succ |
pred = thisblock or bbDominates(succ, pred) or not reachable(pred)
)
)
)
}
}
private predicate is_condition(Expr guard) {
guard.isCondition()
or
is_condition(guard.(BinaryLogicalOperation).getAnOperand())
or
exists(NotExpr cond | is_condition(cond) and cond.getOperand() = guard)
}
/*
* Simplification of equality expressions:
* Simplify conditions in the source to the canonical form l op r + k.
*/
/**
* Holds if `left == right + k` is `areEqual` given that test is `testIsTrue`.
*
* Beware making mistaken logical implications here relating `areEqual` and `testIsTrue`.
*/
private predicate compares_eq(
Expr test, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean areEqual, boolean testIsTrue
) {
/* The simple case where the test *is* the comparison so areEqual = testIsTrue xor eq. */
exists(boolean eq | simple_comparison_eq(test, left, right, k, eq) |
areEqual = true and testIsTrue = eq
or
areEqual = false and testIsTrue = eq.booleanNot()
)
or
logical_comparison_eq(test, left, right, k, areEqual, testIsTrue)
or
/* a == b + k => b == a - k */
exists(int mk | k = -mk | compares_eq(test, right, left, mk, areEqual, testIsTrue))
or
complex_eq(test, left, right, k, areEqual, testIsTrue)
or
/* (x is true => (left == right + k)) => (!x is false => (left == right + k)) */
exists(boolean isFalse | testIsTrue = isFalse.booleanNot() |
compares_eq(test.(NotExpr).getOperand(), left, right, k, areEqual, isFalse)
)
}
/**
* If `test => part` and `part => left == right + k` then `test => left == right + k`.
* Similarly for the case where `test` is false.
*/
private predicate logical_comparison_eq(
BinaryLogicalOperation test, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean areEqual, boolean testIsTrue
) {
exists(boolean partIsTrue, Expr part | test.impliesValue(part, partIsTrue, testIsTrue) |
compares_eq(part, left, right, k, areEqual, partIsTrue)
)
}
/** Rearrange various simple comparisons into `left == right + k` form. */
private predicate simple_comparison_eq(
ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean areEqual
) {
left = cmp.getLeftOperand() and
cmp.getOperator() = "==" and
right = cmp.getRightOperand() and
k = 0 and
areEqual = true
or
left = cmp.getLeftOperand() and
cmp.getOperator() = "!=" and
right = cmp.getRightOperand() and
k = 0 and
areEqual = false
}
private predicate complex_eq(
ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean areEqual, boolean testIsTrue
) {
sub_eq(cmp, left, right, k, areEqual, testIsTrue)
or
add_eq(cmp, left, right, k, areEqual, testIsTrue)
}
// left - x == right + c => left == right + (c+x)
// left == (right - x) + c => left == right + (c-x)
private predicate sub_eq(
ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean areEqual, boolean testIsTrue
) {
exists(SubExpr lhs, int c, int x |
compares_eq(cmp, lhs, right, c, areEqual, testIsTrue) and
left = lhs.getLeftOperand() and
x = int_value(lhs.getRightOperand()) and
k = c + x
)
or
exists(SubExpr rhs, int c, int x |
compares_eq(cmp, left, rhs, c, areEqual, testIsTrue) and
right = rhs.getLeftOperand() and
x = int_value(rhs.getRightOperand()) and
k = c - x
)
}
// left + x == right + c => left == right + (c-x)
// left == (right + x) + c => left == right + (c+x)
private predicate add_eq(
ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean areEqual, boolean testIsTrue
) {
exists(AddExpr lhs, int c, int x |
compares_eq(cmp, lhs, right, c, areEqual, testIsTrue) and
(
left = lhs.getLeftOperand() and x = int_value(lhs.getRightOperand())
or
left = lhs.getRightOperand() and x = int_value(lhs.getLeftOperand())
) and
k = c - x
)
or
exists(AddExpr rhs, int c, int x |
compares_eq(cmp, left, rhs, c, areEqual, testIsTrue) and
(
right = rhs.getLeftOperand() and x = int_value(rhs.getRightOperand())
or
right = rhs.getRightOperand() and x = int_value(rhs.getLeftOperand())
) and
k = c + x
)
}
/*
* Simplification of inequality expressions:
* Simplify conditions in the source to the canonical form l < r + k.
*/
/** Holds if `left < right + k` evaluates to `isLt` given that test is `testIsTrue`. */
private predicate compares_lt(
Expr test, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean isLt, boolean testIsTrue
) {
/* In the simple case, the test is the comparison, so isLt = testIsTrue */
simple_comparison_lt(test, left, right, k) and isLt = true and testIsTrue = true
or
simple_comparison_lt(test, left, right, k) and isLt = false and testIsTrue = false
or
logical_comparison_lt(test, left, right, k, isLt, testIsTrue)
or
complex_lt(test, left, right, k, isLt, testIsTrue)
or
/* (not (left < right + k)) => (left >= right + k) */
exists(boolean isGe | isLt = isGe.booleanNot() |
compares_ge(test, left, right, k, isGe, testIsTrue)
)
or
/* (x is true => (left < right + k)) => (!x is false => (left < right + k)) */
exists(boolean isFalse | testIsTrue = isFalse.booleanNot() |
compares_lt(test.(NotExpr).getOperand(), left, right, k, isLt, isFalse)
)
}
/** `(a < b + k) => (b > a - k) => (b >= a + (1-k))` */
private predicate compares_ge(
Expr test, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean isGe, boolean testIsTrue
) {
exists(int onemk | k = 1 - onemk | compares_lt(test, right, left, onemk, isGe, testIsTrue))
}
/**
* If `test => part` and `part => left < right + k` then `test => left < right + k`.
* Similarly for the case where `test` evaluates false.
*/
private predicate logical_comparison_lt(
BinaryLogicalOperation test, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean isLt, boolean testIsTrue
) {
exists(boolean partIsTrue, Expr part | test.impliesValue(part, partIsTrue, testIsTrue) |
compares_lt(part, left, right, k, isLt, partIsTrue)
)
}
/** Rearrange various simple comparisons into `left < right + k` form. */
private predicate simple_comparison_lt(ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k) {
left = cmp.getLeftOperand() and
cmp.getOperator() = "<" and
right = cmp.getRightOperand() and
k = 0
or
left = cmp.getLeftOperand() and
cmp.getOperator() = "<=" and
right = cmp.getRightOperand() and
k = 1
or
right = cmp.getLeftOperand() and
cmp.getOperator() = ">" and
left = cmp.getRightOperand() and
k = 0
or
right = cmp.getLeftOperand() and
cmp.getOperator() = ">=" and
left = cmp.getRightOperand() and
k = 1
}
private predicate complex_lt(
ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean isLt, boolean testIsTrue
) {
sub_lt(cmp, left, right, k, isLt, testIsTrue)
or
add_lt(cmp, left, right, k, isLt, testIsTrue)
}
// left - x < right + c => left < right + (c+x)
// left < (right - x) + c => left < right + (c-x)
private predicate sub_lt(
ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean isLt, boolean testIsTrue
) {
exists(SubExpr lhs, int c, int x |
compares_lt(cmp, lhs, right, c, isLt, testIsTrue) and
left = lhs.getLeftOperand() and
x = int_value(lhs.getRightOperand()) and
k = c + x
)
or
exists(SubExpr rhs, int c, int x |
compares_lt(cmp, left, rhs, c, isLt, testIsTrue) and
right = rhs.getLeftOperand() and
x = int_value(rhs.getRightOperand()) and
k = c - x
)
}
// left + x < right + c => left < right + (c-x)
// left < (right + x) + c => left < right + (c+x)
private predicate add_lt(
ComparisonOperation cmp, Expr left, Expr right, int k, boolean isLt, boolean testIsTrue
) {
exists(AddExpr lhs, int c, int x |
compares_lt(cmp, lhs, right, c, isLt, testIsTrue) and
(
left = lhs.getLeftOperand() and x = int_value(lhs.getRightOperand())
or
left = lhs.getRightOperand() and x = int_value(lhs.getLeftOperand())
) and
k = c - x
)
or
exists(AddExpr rhs, int c, int x |
compares_lt(cmp, left, rhs, c, isLt, testIsTrue) and
(
right = rhs.getLeftOperand() and x = int_value(rhs.getRightOperand())
or
right = rhs.getRightOperand() and x = int_value(rhs.getLeftOperand())
) and
k = c + x
)
}
/** The `int` value of integer constant expression. */
private int int_value(Expr e) {
e.getUnderlyingType() instanceof IntegralType and
result = e.getValue().toInt()
}
import IRGuards
/** An `SsaDefinition` with an additional predicate `isLt`. */
class GuardedSsa extends SsaDefinition {