<qhelp> <overview>

JSDoc comments for functions and constructors should use the `@param` tag to describe the available parameters. Wrong or outdated parameter names in `@param` tags make the documentation difficult to read, and may indicate badly maintained code.

</overview> <recommendation>

The parameter names should be corrected. If the documented parameter was removed, its corresponding `@param` tag should also be removed.

</recommendation> <example>

In the following example, the constructor `Message` has a JSDoc comment containing two `@param` tags, one documenting the parameter `title`, and one documenting a non-existent parameter `text`.

Assuming that `text` was the previous name of the parameter `body`, the second `@param` should be updated to refer to the parameter `body` instead.

</example> <references>

- Use JSDoc: The @param tag.
</references> </qhelp>